Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T03:58:33.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coffee Senna (Cassia occidentalis) Competition with Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Jeffery M. Higgins ,
Robert H. Walker  and
Ted Whitwell
Jeffery M. Higgins
Affiliation:
Agron. and Soils Dep., Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., AL 36849
Robert H. Walker
Affiliation:
Agron. and Soils Dep., Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., AL 36849
Ted Whitwell
Affiliation:
Agron. and Soils Dep., Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., AL 36849
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field research was conducted at two locations in 1982 and 1983 to evaluate the competitiveness of coffee senna (Cassia occidentalis L. # CASOC) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). With season-long competition, each increase of 1 coffee senna plant/7.5 m of row reduced seed cotton by 9 to 117 kg/ha. Each additional week of competition from a dense stand (40 plants/m of row) of coffee senna reduced seed cotton yield by 118 kg/ha and cotton main stem height by 1.25 cm. Neither cotton stand density nor fiber properties were affected by coffee senna density or duration of competition. Seed cotton yields and main stem heights obtained when cotton was kept weed free for 6 weeks after cotton emergence were not significantly different from those kept weed free for 8, 10, or 14 weeks. Coffee senna dry-matter production was essentially zero when cotton was maintained weed free for 8 or more weeks.

Keywords

Weed densityduration of competitionweed-free periodsCASOC
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , January 1986 , pp. 52 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1980. Weed survey. Res. Rep., South. Weed Sci. Soc. 33:165–197.Google Scholar
2. Anonymous. 1983. Weed survey. Res. Rep., South. Weed Sci. Soc. 36:148–184.Google Scholar
3. Buchanan, G. A. and Burns, E. R. 1970. Influence of weed competition on cotton. Weed Sci. 38:149–154.Google Scholar
4. Buchanan, G. A. and Burns, E. R. 1971. Weed competition in cotton. I. Sicklepod and tall morningglory. Weed Sci. 19:576–579.Google Scholar
5. Buchanan, G. A., Crowley, R. H., and McLaughlin, R. D. 1977. Competition of prickly sida with cotton. Weed Sci. 23:106–110.Google Scholar
6. Buchanan, G. A., Crowley, R. H., Street, J. E., and McGuire, J. A. 1980. Competition of sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 28:258–262.Google Scholar
7. Buchanan, G. A. and McLaughlin, R. D. 1975. Influence of nitrogen on weed competition in cotton. Weed Sci. 23:324–328.Google Scholar
8. Gudauskas, R. T., Teem, D. H., and Morgan-Jones, G. 1977. Anthracnose of Cassia occidentalis caused by Colletotrichum dematium f. truncata . Plant Dis. Rep. 61(6):468–470.Google Scholar
9. Harper, J. K. 1957. Ecological aspects of weed control. Outlook Agric. 1(5):197–205.Google Scholar
10. Ivy, H. W. and Baker, R. S. 1972. Prickly sida control and competition in cotton. Weed Sci. 20:137–139.Google Scholar
11. Martinez, C. I. and Nieto, J. 1968. The critical periods of competition between weeds and spring cotton in the Yaqui Valley of Obregon, Sonora, Mexico. Proc. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 21:151.Google Scholar
12. Massey, J. H. and Sowell, G. Jr. 1969. Effects of spacing arrangement and anthracnose on Cassia occidentalis L. Agron. J. 61:749–750.Google Scholar
13. Patterson, M. G., Buchanan, G. A., Street, J. E., and Crowley, R. H. 1980. Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) competition with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 28:327–329.Google Scholar
14. Robinson, E. L. 1976. Yield and height of cotton as affected by weed densities and nitrogen levels. Weed Sci. 24:40–42.Google Scholar
15. Rogers, N. K., Buchanan, G. A., and Johnson, W. C. 1976. Influence of row spacing on weed competition with cotton. Weed Sci. 24:410–413.Google Scholar
16. Snipes, C. E., Buchanan, G. A., Street, J. E., and McGuire, J. A. 1982. Competition of common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 30:553–556.Google Scholar
17. Street, J. E., Buchanan, G. A., Crowley, R. H., and McGuire, J. A. 1981. Influence of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) densities on competitiveness of pigweed (Amaranthus spp.) and sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia). Weed Sci. 29:253–256.Google Scholar
18. Templeton, J. 1932. Watering and spacing experiment with Egyptian cotton. Egyptian Min. Agric., Tech. and Stn. Serv. Bull. No. 112. 7pp.Google Scholar