Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T19:30:27.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Carryover Potential of Imazaquin to Cotton, Grain Sorghum, Wheat, Rice, and Corn

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David H. Johnson ,
Ronald E. Talbert  and
Diana R. Horton
David H. Johnson
Affiliation:
Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville
Ronald E. Talbert
Affiliation:
Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville
Diana R. Horton
Affiliation:
Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The duration of imazaquin soil activity on corn, grain sorghum, rice, and cotton was studied from 1988 to 1990. Imazaquin applied at 0.035, 0.07, 0.14 (1× rate), and 0.28 kg ai ha−1 was incorporated into the soil, and rotational crops were planted at various times after application. Initial crop visual injury was directly related to imazaquin application rate. Cotton was most susceptible, followed by corn, grain sorghum, and rice. The carryover of imazaquin from soybeans to cotton, grain sorghum, and wheat was studied in separate experiments in Arkansas in 1987 to 1989. Wheat planted in the fall following soybean harvest was not affected by imazaquin residues. Grain sorghum planted the following spring was injured (16–35%), but there was no yield reduction. Cotton recovered from early injury (< 35%) in one year and did not recover from severe injury (> 50%) in the other, resulting in yield reduction.

Keywords

Imazaquin, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-3-quinolinecarboxylic acidcorn, Zea mays L. ‘B73 x Mol’cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Arkot 518’grain sorghum, Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. ‘Warner 744-DR’rice, Oryza sativa L. ‘Newbonnet’soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Forrest’wheat, Triticum aestivum L. ‘Florida 302.’Herbicide carryover
Type
Soil, Air, and Water
Information
Weed Science , Volume 43 , Issue 3 , September 1995 , pp. 454 - 460
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

1. Alexander, M. 1977. Introduction to soil microbiology. 2nd ed. Wiley, New York. pp. 22, 40.Google Scholar
2. Barnes, C. J., Goetz, A. J., and Lavy, T. L. 1989. Effects of imazaquin residues on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 37:820–824.Google Scholar
3. Basham, G. W. and Lavy, T. L. 1987. Microbial and phytolytic dissipation of imazaquin in soil. Weed Sci. 35:865–870.Google Scholar
4. Bohn, H. L., McNeal, B. L., and O'Conner, G. A. 1985. Soil Chemistry. 2nd ed Wiley, New York. p. 219.Google Scholar
5. Cantwell, J. R., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Biodegradation characteristics of imazaquin and imazethapyr. Weed Sci. 37:815–819.Google Scholar
6. Congleton, W. F., Vancantfort, A. M., and Lignowski, E. M. 1987. Imazaquin (Scepter)®: Anew soybean herbicide. Weed Technol. 1:186–188.Google Scholar
7. Crop Protection Chemicals Reference. 10th ed. 1994. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Press, New York. p. 136.Google Scholar
8. Cumin, W. S., Liebl, R. A., and Simmons, F. W. 1992. Effects of tillage and application method on clomazone, imazaquin, and imazethapyr persistence. Weed Sci. 40:482–489.Google Scholar
9. Fehr, W R., Caviness, C. E., Burmood, D. T., and Pennington, J. S. 1971. Stage of development descriptions for soybeans (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Crop Sci. 11:929–931.Google Scholar
10. Goetz, A. J., Wehtje, G., Walker, R. H., and Hajek, B. 1986. Soil solution and mobility characterization of imazaquin. Weed Sci. 34:788–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. 1984. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. 2nd. ed. Wiley, New York, pp 256–259, 298–299.Google Scholar
12. Kells, J. J., Leep, R. H., Tesar, M. B., Leavitt, R. A., and Cudnohufsky, J. 1990. Effect of atrazine and tillage on alfalfa (Medicago sativa) establishment on corn (Zea mays)-alfalfa rotation. Weed Technol. 4:360–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Loux, M. M., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Adsorption of imazaquin and imazethapyr on soils, sediments, and selected adsorbents. Weed. Sci. 37:712–718.Google Scholar
14. Malefyt, T. and Quakenbush, L. 1991. Influence of environmental factors on the biological activity of the imidazolinone herbicides. Pages 103–127 in Shaner, D. L. and O'Conner, S. L., eds. The imidazolinone herbicides. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
15. Mangels, G. 1991. Behavior of the imidazolinone herbicides in soil-a review of literature. Pages 191–209 in Shaner, D. L. and O'Conner, S. L., eds. The imidazolinone herbicides. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
16. Mauney, J. R. 1986. Vegetative growth and development of fruiting sites. Pages 11–28 in Mauney, J. R. and Stewart, J. M., eds. Cotton physiology. The Cotton Foundation Reference Book Series No. 1. The Cotton Foundation: Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
17. Mills, J. A. and Witt, W. W. 1989. Efficacy, phytoxicity, and persistence of imazaquin, imazethapyr, and clomazone in no-till double-crop soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 37:353–359.Google Scholar
18. Monks, C. D. and Banks, P. A. 1991. Rotational crop response to chlorimuron, clomazone, and imazaquin applied the previous year. Weed Sci. 39:629–633.Google Scholar
19. Renner, K. A., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1988. Effect of soil pH on imazaquin and imazethapyr adsorption to soil and phytotoxicity to corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 36:78–83.Google Scholar
20. Ross, M. A. and Lembi, C. A. 1985. Applied weed science. Burgess: Minneapolis, pp. 97–101.Google Scholar
21. Shaner, D. L. 1991. Physiological effects of the imidazolinone herbicides. Pages 129–137 in Shaner, D. L. and O'Conner, S. L., eds. The imidazolinone herbicides. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
22. Stougaard, R. N., Shea, P. J., and Martin, A. R. 1990. Effect of soil type and pH on adsorption, mobility, and efficacy of imazaquin and imazethapyr. Weed Sci. 38:67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Wepplo, P. J. 1991. Chemical and physical properties of the imidazolinones. Pages 15–29 in Shaner, D. L. and O'Conner, S. L., eds. The imidazolinone herbicides. CRC Press, Boca Raton.Google Scholar