Skip to main content Accessibility help

Canada Thistle (Cirsium arvense) Response to Simulated Insect Defoliation and Plant Competition

  • Ban N. Ang (a1), Loke T. Kok (a2), Golde I. Holtzman (a2) and Dale D. Wolf (a3)


The combined influence of plant competition and defoliation on development of Canada thistle was investigated in a 2-yr field study. Plant competition was induced by seeding tall fescue and crown vetch. Artificial defoliation was used to simulate various levels of leaf removal by insects. Both defoliation and induced competition reduced biomass of Canada thistle but their impact varied with environmental conditions. Defoliation had a greater detrimental influence than induced competition on thistle biomass in a dry year when growth of the plant competitors was suppressed. In a wet year, induced competition was more important in suppressing Canada thistle than defoliation, and moderate levels of defoliation (25%), applied once when the thistles were 12 to 15 cm in diam, stimulated root weight within the top 20 cm of soil. Reduction in thistle biomass increased with level of defoliation and was greatest when defoliation was applied repeatedly at 14-d intervals in the presence of induced competition. Crown vetch showed very little growth in one season and tall fescue was the primary source of competition for the thistles. The results confirm the hypothesis that combined stresses can substantially reduce biomass development of Canada thistle plants.



Hide All
1. Barber, H. S. 1916. A review of North American tortoise beetles. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Washington. 18:113127.
2. Boucher, T. J. and Pfeiffer, D. G. 1989. Influence of Japanese beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) foliar feeding on ‘Seyval Blanc’ grapevines in Virginia. J. Econ. Entomol. 82:220225.
3. Cartwright, B. and Kok, L. T. 1990. Feeding by Cassida rubiginosa (Coleop: Chrysomelidae) and the effects of defoliation on growth of musk thistles. J. Entomol. Sci. 25:538547.
4. Cox, C. S. and McEvoy, P. B. 1983. Effect of summer moisture on the capacity of tansy ragwort (Senecio jacobaea) to compensate for defoliation by cinnabar moth (Tyria jacobaeae). J. Appl. Ecol. 20:225234.
5. Doll, J. D. 1984. Controlling Canada thistle. North Cent. Reg. Ext. Publ. No. 218. Urbana-Champaign: Coop. Serv. Univ. Illinois. 4 pp.
6. Freund, R. J. and Littell, R. C. 1991. SAS System for regression. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC. Page 157.
7. Hall, F. R. and Ferree, D. C. 1976. Effects of insect injury simulation on photosynthesis of apple leaves. J. Econ. Entomol. 69:245248.
8. Harris, P. 1974. A possible explanation of plant yield increase following insect damage. Agro-Ecosystems 1:219225.
9. Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. Asteraceae, Aster Family. Pages 217224 in The world's worst weeds: Distribution and biology. Univ. Hawaii, Honolulu.
10. Julien, M. H. 1992. Biological control of weeds. A world catalogue of agents and their target weeds. Commonw. Agric. Bur. U.K. Pages 25, 26, and 129.
11. Kok, L. T., McAvoy, T. J., and Mays, W. T. 1986. Impact of tall fescue grass and Carduus thistle weevils on the growth and development of musk thistle (Carduus nutans). Weed Sci. 34:966971.
12. Lentner, M. and Bishop, T. 1986. Experimental Design and Analysis. Valley Book Co., Blacksburg, VA. Pages 128 and 360-363.
13. Maw, M. G. 1976. An annotated list of insects associated with Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) in Canada. Can. Entomol. 108:235244.
14. McAllister, R. S. and Haderlie, L. C. 1985. Seasonal variations in Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) root bud growth and root carbohydrate reserves. Weed Sci. 33:4449.
15. Michaud, J. P. 1991. Biomass allocation in fireweed Epilobium angustifolium L. (Onagraceae) in response to simulated defoliation. Bot. Gaz. 152:208213.
16. Poston, F. L., Pedigo, L. P., Pearce, R. B., and Hammond, R. B. 1976. Effects of artificial and insect defoliation on soybean net photosynthesis. J. Econ. Entomol. 69:109112.
17. Reece, P. E. and Wilson, R. G. 1983. Effects of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) and musk thistle (Carduus nutans) control on grass herbage. Weed Sci. 31:488492.
18. SAS Institute, Inc. 1989. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 6. 4th ed., Vol. 2. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC. Pages 895896.
19. Schröder, D. 1980. The biological control of thistles. Biocontrol News and Information 1:126.
20. Smith, D. 1969. Removing and analyzing total nonstructural carbohydrate from plant tissue. Wis. Agric. Exp. Stn. Res. Rep. 41:111.
21. Story, J. M., DeSmet-Moens, H., and Morrill, W. L. 1985. Phytophagous insects associated with Canada thistle, Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop., in Southern Montana. J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 58:472478.
22. Todd, J. W. and Morgan, L. W. 1972. Effects of hand defoliation on yield and seed weight of soybeans. J. Econ. Entomol. 65:567570.
23. Winder, J. A. and vanEmden, H. F. 1980. Selection of effective biological control agents from artificial defoliation/insect cage experiments. Pages 415439 in Delfosse, E. S., ed. Proc. 5th Int. Symp. Biol. Control of Weeds. CSIRO, Melbourne.
24. Wright, S. L., Hall, R. W., and Peacock, J. W. 1989. Effect of simulated insect damage on growth and survival of northern red oat (Quercus rubra L.) seedlings. Environ. Entomol. 18:235239.
25. Zar, J. 1984. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Pages 6465.
26. Zwölfer, H. 1965. Preliminary list of phytophagous insects attacking wild Cynareae (Compositae) species in Europe. Commw. Inst. Biol. Control Tech. Bull. 6:81154.


Canada Thistle (Cirsium arvense) Response to Simulated Insect Defoliation and Plant Competition

  • Ban N. Ang (a1), Loke T. Kok (a2), Golde I. Holtzman (a2) and Dale D. Wolf (a3)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed