Skip to main content Accessibility help

Buckwheat Residue Effects on Emergence and Growth of Weeds in Winter-Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Cropping Systems

  • Virender Kumar (a1), Daniel C. Brainard (a1), Robin R. Bellinder (a1) and Russell R. Hahn (a2)


Field and pot studies were conducted in Central New York to determine the potential weed-management benefits of a buckwheat cover crop grown before winter wheat. Specific objectives were to determine buckwheat residue effects on (1) emergence and growth of winter annual weeds; (2) wheat establishment and yield; and (3) emergence of summer annual weeds in the spring following overwinter seed burial. In a field study, buckwheat was sown at two timings (July or August), mowed, and either incorporated or left on the soil surface. Winter wheat was drilled into buckwheat residue in September and weed and crop growth were monitored. In a complementary pot study, four winter annual weeds were sown in soil removed from buckwheat and bare-soil plots at 0 or 15 d after incorporation and monitored for emergence and early growth. To assess buckwheat residue effects on spring emergence from overwintering seeds, seeds of three weed species were buried in buckwheat residue and bare-soil plots in the fall, exhumed in April, and evaluated for emergence. To investigate the mechanism for possible effects of buckwheat residue on overwintering seeds, two levels each of seed treatment (none or fungicide) and fertilization (none or 170 kg ha−1) were applied before burial. Buckwheat residue had no negative effect on wheat yields but suppressed emergence (22 to 72%) and growth (0 to 95%) of winter annual weeds, although effects were often small and inconsistent. Buckwheat residue had no effect on the emergence of buried weed seeds in spring. However, fungicide treatment enhanced the emergence of Powell amaranth seeds by 12.5 to 25.5% and of barnyardgrass seeds by 0 to 12%. Our results suggest that buckwheat residue can contribute to weed management in wheat cropping systems, but that further studies investigating the mechanistic basis for the inconsistent selective effects of buckwheat residue on weeds are needed before buckwheat use can be optimized.


Corresponding author

Corresponding author's E-mail:


Hide All

Current address: International Rice Research Institute—India, NASC Complex, Pusa, New Delhi.

Current address: Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1325.



Hide All
Amann, C. and Amberger, A. 1989. Phosphorous efficiency of buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum). Zeits. Pflanz.hrung Bodenk. 152:181189.
Björkman, T., Bellinder, R., Hahn, R., and Shail, J. W. Jr. 2008. Buckwheat Cover Crop Handbook. Ithaca, NY Cornell University Press. 17 p.
Brainard, D. C., DiTommaso, A., and Mohler, C. L. 2006. Intraspecific variation in germination response to ammonium nitrate of Powell amaranth (Amaranthus powellii) seeds originating from organic vs. conventional vegetable farms. Weed Sci. 54:435442.
Bugg, R. L. and Ellis, R. T. 1990. Insects associated with cover crops in Massachusetts. Biol. Agric. Hortic. 7:4768.
Carr, P. M., Horsley, R. D., and Poland, W. W. 2003. Tillage and seeding rate effects on wheat cultivars: II. Yield components. Crop Sci. 43:210218.
Chee-Sanford, J. C., Williams, M. M. II., Davis, A. S., and Sims, G. K. 2006. Do microorganisms influence seed-bank dynamics? Weed Sci. 54:575587.
Clark, A. 2007. Managing Cover Crops Profitably. 3rd ed. Handbook Series Book 3. Beltsville, MD Sustainable Agriculture Network. 244 p.
Colosi, J. C., Cavers, P. B., and Bough, M. A. 1988. Dormancy and survival in buried seeds of proso-millet. Can. J. Bot. 66:161168.
Creamer, N. G. and Baldwin, K. R. 2000. An evaluation of summer cover crops for use in vegetable production systems in North Carolina. HortScience. 35:600603.
Davis, A. S. 2007. Nitrogen fertilizer and crop residue effects on seed mortality and germination of eight annual weed species. Weed Sci. 55:123128.
Davis, A. S. and Liebman, M. 2003. Cropping system effects on Setaria faberi seedbank dynamics. Aspects Appl. Biol. 69:8391.
Egley, G. H. 1989. Some effects of nitrate-treated soils upon the sensitivity of buried redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) seeds to ethylene, temperature, light and carbon dioxide. Plant Cell Environ. 12:581588.
Fennimore, S. A. and Jackson, L. E. 2003. Organic amendment and tillage effects on vegetable field weed emergence and seedbanks. Weed Technol. 17:4250.
Fitzgerald, C. B., Butler, B. R., Davis, M. G., and Coffman, C. B. 2003. New cover crops and cover crop management for organic vegetable producers in Maryland. in Organic Farming Research Foundation Project Report. Santa Cruz, CA Organic Farming Research Foundation. 11 p.
Froud-Williams, R. J., Chancellor, R. J., and Drennan, D.S.H. 1983. Influence of cultivation regime upon buried weed seeds in arable cropping systems. J. Appl. Ecol. 20:199208.
Gallandt, E. R., Fuerst, E. P., and Kennedy, A. C. 2004. Effects of tillage, fungicide seed treatment, and soil fumigation on annual mortality of Avena fatua . Weed Sci. 52:597604.
Gallandt, E. R., Liebman, M., and Huggins, D. R. 1999. Improving soil qualities: implications for weed management. J. Crop Prod. 2:95121.
Golisz, A., Ciarka, D., and Gawronski, S. W. 2002. Allelopathy activity of buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench). Page 161 in Fujii, Y., Hidarate, S., and Araya, H., eds. Proceedings III World Congress on Allelopathy. Tsukuba City, Ibaraki, Japan Sato Printing.
Haramoto, E. R. and Gallandt, E. R. 2005. Brassica cover cropping: I. Effects on weed and crop establishment. Weed Sci. 53:695701.
Iqbal, Z., Hiradate, S., Noda, A., Isojima, S., and Fuji, Y. 2003. Allelopathic activity of buckwheat: isolation and characterization of phenolics. Weed Sci. 51:657662.
Kumar, V., Brainard, D. C., and Bellinder, R. R. 2008. Suppression of Powell amaranth (Amaranthus powellii), shepherd's-purse (Capsella bursa-pastoris), and corn chamomile (Anthemis arvensis) by buckwheat residues: role of nitrogen and fungal pathogens. Weed Sci. 56:271280.
Kumar, V., Brainard, D. C., and Bellinder, R. R. 2009a. Effects of spring-sown cover crops on establishment and growth of hairy galinsoga (Galinsoga ciliata) and four vegetable crops. HortScience. 44:730736.
Kumar, V., Brainard, D. C., and Bellinder, R. R. 2009b. Suppression of Powell amaranth (Amaranthus powellii) by buckwheat residues: role of allelopathy. Weed Sci. 57:6673.
Leishman, M. R., Masters, G. J., Clarke, I. P., and Brown, V. K. 2000. Seed bank dynamics: the role of fungal pathogens and climate change. Funct. Ecol. 14:293299.
Lonsdale, W. M. 1993. Losses from the seed bank of Mimosa pigra: soil micro-organisms vs. temperature fluctuations. J. Appl. Ecol. 30:654660.
Pitty, A., Staniforth, D. W., and Tiffany, L. H. 1987. Fungi associated with caryopses of Setaria species from field-harvested seeds and from soil under two tillage systems. Weed Sci. 35:319323.
SAS Institute. 2001. SAS/STAT User's Guide Version 8-1. Cary, NC SAS Institute. 1030 p.
Tanaka, D. L. 1989. Spring wheat plant parameters as affected by fallow methods in the northern Great Plains. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 53:15061511.
Tominaga, T. and Uezu, T. 1995. Weed suppression by buckwheat. Pages 693697 in Matano, T. and Ujihasa, A., eds. Current Advances in Buckwheat Research. Volume 2. Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium of Buckwheat. Nagano, Japan Shinshu University Press.
Westoby, M., Leishman, M., and Lord, J. 1996. Comparative ecology of seed size and dispersal. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 351:13091318.
Xuan, T. D. and Tsuzuki, E. 2004. Allelopathic plants: buckwheat. Allelopathy J. 13:137148.
Zorner, P. S., Zimdahl, R. L., and Schweizer, E. E. 1984. Sources of viable seed loss in buried dormant and nondormant population of wild oat (Avena fatua L.) seed in Colorado. Weed Res. 24:143150.


Buckwheat Residue Effects on Emergence and Growth of Weeds in Winter-Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Cropping Systems

  • Virender Kumar (a1), Daniel C. Brainard (a1), Robin R. Bellinder (a1) and Russell R. Hahn (a2)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed