Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T01:43:42.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Adsorption, Mobility, and Efficacy of Metribuzin as Influenced by Soil Properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

C. John Peter
Affiliation:
E. I. duPont de Nemours and Co., Wilmington, DE 19898
Jerome B. Weber
Affiliation:
Crop Sci. Dep., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695–7627

Abstract

The effect of various soil parameters on metribuzin [4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-one] efficacy was studied on seven soils and metribuzin adsorption was investigated in nine soils. Soil organic-matter and clay contents were correlated with metribuzin activity. Specific surface area, as measured by ethylene glycol monoethyl ether (EGME) was highly correlated with metribuzin activity. Soil organic-matter content and EGME surface area measurements were also highly correlated with metribuzin adsorption in soils. Since metribuzin is highly water soluble (water solubility greater than 1000 ppm), it was probably adsorbed at the hydrophilic sites on the soil surfaces that were measured by EGME. Metribuzin was much more mobile than atrazine [6-chloro-N-ethyl-N′-(1-methylethyl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine] in a leaching study.

Type
Soil, Air, and Water
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous, 1983. Reference soil test methods for the southern region of the United States. South. Coop. Series Bull. 289. Univ. Georgia, Athens, GA. 40 pp.Google Scholar
2. Brunauer, S., Emmet, P. H., and Teller, E. 1938. Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 60:309319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Carter, D. L., Heilman, M. D., and Gonzales, C. L. 1965. Ethylene glycol monoethyl ether for determining surface area of silicate minerals. Soil Sci. 21:308309.Google Scholar
4. Coble, H. D. and Schrader, J. W. 1973. Soybean tolerance to metribuzin. Weed Sci. 21:308309.Google Scholar
5. Day, P. R. 1965. Particle fractionation and particle-size analysis. Pages 545566 in Black, C. A., ed. Methods of Soil Analysis (Part I). Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
6. Giles, C. H., MacEwan, T. H., Nakhwa, S. N., and Smith, D. 1960. Studies in adsorption, Part XI. A system of classification of solution adsorption isotherms and its use in diagnosis of adsorption mechanisms and in measurement of specific surface areas of soils. J. Chem. Soc. Pages 39733993.Google Scholar
7. Harris, D. I. 1966. Adsorption, movement, and phytotoxicity of monuron and s-triazine herbicides in soil. Weeds 14:610.Google Scholar
8. Helling, C. S. 1971. Pesticide mobility in soils 1. Parameters of thin-layer chromatography. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 35:732737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Hyzak, D. L. and Zimdahl, R. L. 1974. Rate of degradation of metribuzin and two analogs in soil. Weed Sci. 22:7579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Kaufman, D. D. and Kearny, P. C. 1970. Microbial degradation of s-triazine herbicides. Pages 235265 in Gunther, F. A., ed. Residue Reviews, Vol. 32, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
11. Ladlie, S., Meggitt, F., and Penner, D. 1976. Effect of soil pH on microbial degradation, adsorption, and mobility of metribuzin. Weed Sci. 24:477481.Google Scholar
12. Ladlie, D., Meggitt, F., and Penner, D. 1976. Role of pH in metribuzin dissipation in field soils. Weed Sci. 24:508511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Leopold, A. C., Van Schaik, P., and Neal, M. 1969. Molecular structure and herbicide adsorption. Weeds 8:4854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. McWhorter, C. G. and Anderson, J. M. 1976. Effectiveness of metribuzin applied preemergence for economical control of common cocklebur in soybeans. Weed Sci. 24:385389.Google Scholar
15. McWhorter, C. G. and Barrentine, W. L. 1975. Cocklebur control in soybeans as affected by cultivars, seeding rates, and methods of weed control. Weed Sci. 23:386389.Google Scholar
16. Peter, C. J. and Weber, J. B. 1985. Adsorption and efficacy of trifluralin and butralin as influenced by soil properties. Weed Sci. 33:861867.Google Scholar
17. Peter, C. J. and Weber, J. B. 1985. Adsorption, mobility, and efficacy of alachlor and metolachlor as influenced by soil properties. Weed. Sci. 33:874881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Rahman, A. and Matthews, L. J. 1979. Effect of soil organic matter on the phytotoxicity of thirteen s-triazine herbicides. Weed Sci. 27:158161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Rodgers, E. G. 1968. Leaching of seven s-triazines. Weed Sci. 16:117120.Google Scholar
20. Savage, K. E. 1976. Adsorption and mobility of metribuzin in soil. Weed Sci. 24:525528.Google Scholar
21. Savage, K. E. 1977. Metribuzin persistence in soil. Weed Sci. 25:5559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Sharom, M. S. and Stephenson, G. R. 1976. Behavior and fate of metribuzin in eight Ontario soils. Weed Sci. 24:153160.Google Scholar
23. Wax, L. M. 1977. Incorporation depth and rainfall on weed control in soybeans with metribuzin. Agron. J. 69:107110.Google Scholar
24. Weber, J. B. 1966. Molecular structure and pH effects on the adsorption of 13 s-triazine compounds on montmorillonite clay. Am. Mineralog. 51:16571670.Google Scholar
25. Weber, J. B. and Peeper, T. F. 1977. Herbicide mobility in soils. Pages 7378 in Truelove, B., ed. Research Methods in Weed Science. South. Weed Sci. Soc., Auburn Printing, Auburn, AL.Google Scholar
26. Webster, G.T.B. and Reimer, G. J. 1976. Field degradation of the herbicide metribuzin and its degradation products in a Manitoba sandy loam soil. Weed Res. 16:191196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar