Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-pt5lt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-19T08:54:29.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Absorption and Translocation of Foliar-Applied Sulfometuron in Leafy Spurge (Euphorbia esula)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Rodney G. Lym
Rodney G. Lym*
Affiliation:
Crop and Weed Sci. Dep., North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Optimum conditions for leafy spurge control with sulfometuron were determined. Absorption and translocation of 14C-sulfometuron to roots in leafy spurge averaged 11 and 0.1% of applied herbicide, respectively, and were not affected by growth stage. Absorption and translocation increased to 40 and 4%, respectively, of applied 14C-sulfometuron when the relative humidity remained at 90 and 95% for at least 72 h after treatment Absorption and translocation of 14C-sulfometuron to the roots were similar at 18/14 and 24/20 C and when 14C-sulfometuron was applied with picloram or 2,4-D. Absorption of 14C-picloram was greater but 14C-2,4-D absorption was less when applied with sulfometuron compared to picloram or 2,4-D applied alone. Sulfometuron plus picloram applied during the fall regrowth stage provided better leafy spurge control than either herbicide applied alone. The combination treatment would be useful especially in areas where grass injury was acceptable in order to extend the fall treatment season by 2 to 3 wk compared to present practices.

Keywords

Picloram, 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylic acidsulfometuron, 2-[[[[(4,6-dimethyl-2-pyrimidinyl)-amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acid, 2,4-D (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acidleafy spurge, Euphorbia esula L. # EPHESPicloramrange improvement2,4-DEPHES
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , September 1992 , pp. 477 - 481
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anderson, J. J. and Dulka, J. J. 1985. Environmental fate of sulfometuron methyl in aerobic soils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 33:596–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Chaleff, R. S. and Mauvis, C. J. 1984. Acetolactate synthase is the site of action of two sulfonylurea herbicides in higher plants. Science 224:1443–1445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Dunn, P. H. 1979. The distribution of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) and other weedy Euphorbia spp. in the United States. Weed Sci. 27:509–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Harvey, J. Jr., Dulka, J. J., and Anderson, J. J. 1985. Properties of sulfometuron methyl affecting its environmental fate: aqueous hydrolysis and photolysis, mobility and adsorption on soils, and bioaccumulation potential. J. Agric. Food Chem. 33:590–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. LaRossa, R. A. and Schloss, J. V. 1984. The sulfonylurea herbicide sulfometuron methyl is an extremely potent and selective inhibitor of acetolactate synthase in Salmonella typhimurium . J. Biol. Chem. 259:8753–8757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Link, M. L. and Atkins, R. L. 1983. Control and suppression of warm season grasses to reduce mowing on highway rights-of-way. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 36:310–311.Google Scholar
7. Lym, R. G. and Messersmith, C. G. 1985. Control of leafy spurge in North Dakota: 20-year summary. J. Range Manage. 38:149–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Lym, R. G. and Messersmith, C. G. 1988. Evaluation of sulfometuron and other sulfonylurea herbicides for leafy spurge control. Res. Prog. Rep. West. Soc. Weed Sci. Pages 21–23.Google Scholar
9. Lym, R. G. and Messersmith, C. G. 1990. Effect of temperature on picloram absorption and translocation in leafy spurge. Weed Sci. 38:471–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Lym, R. G. and Messersmith, C. G. 1991. Correlation of environment and root carbohydrate content to picloram translocation in leafy spurge. J. Range Manage. 44:254–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Lym, R. G. and Moxness, K. D. 1989. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of picloram and 2,4-D in leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) . Weed Sci. 37:498–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Lym, R. G. and Swenson, O. R. 1991. Sulfometuron persistence and movement in soil and water in North Dakota. J. Environ. Qual. 20:209–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Malhorta, S. S. and Hanson, J. B. 1970. Picloram sensitivity and nucleic acids in plants. Weed Sci. 18:1–4.Google Scholar
14. Nissen, S. J., Masters, P. A., and Stougaard, R. N. 1990. Uptake and translocation of imazethapyr by leafy spurge. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:93–94.Google Scholar
15. Ray, T. B. 1984. Site of action of chlorsulfuron inhibition of valine and isoleucine biosynthesis in plants. Plant Physiol. 75:827–831.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Withrow, K. D. and Middlebrooks, P. D. 1983. Control of roadside vegetation in Georgia with “Oust”. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 36:293.Google Scholar