Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T01:22:37.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Grass Interference in Container-Grown Bailey's Redosier Dogwood (Cornus × baileyi)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Kandy L. Walker  and
David J. Williams
Kandy L. Walker
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic., Univ. Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
David J. Williams
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic., Univ. Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments conducted for two consecutive years indicated measurable interference of barnyardgrass, large crabgrass, and giant foxtail with container-grown Bailey's redosier dogwood as early as 21 days after transplanting of grass seedlings into the containers. Few differences in interference were seen among the three grass weeds. Grass weed densities ranging from one to six weeds per container reduced the dogwood growth. By the termination of the studies, dogwood shoot dry weight, averaged over all grass weeds, was decreased as much as 72% by five weeds per container. Eight weeks after recommended rates of fenoxaprop, haloxyfop, and ethyl ester of quizalofop were applied to dogwood, no phytotoxicity was apparent. These compounds exhibited selectivity for postemergence use in Bailey's redosier dogwood.

Keywords

Barnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli L. #3 ECHCGlarge crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis L. # DIGSAgiant foxtail, Setaria faberi Herrm. # SETFABailey's redosier dogwood, Cornus × baileyifenoxaprop, (±) - 2- [4- [(6-chloro- 2-benzoxazsolyl)oxy] phenoxy] propanoic acidhaloxyfop, 2-[4-([3-chloro-5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl]oxy]phenoxypropanoic acidand ethyl ester of quizalofop, (±)-2-(4-[(6-chloro-2-quinoxalinyl)oxy] -phenoxy] propionic acidFenoxaprophaloxyfopimazaquinquizalofopimazethapyrDIGSAECHCGSETFA
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 36 , Issue 5 , September 1988 , pp. 621 - 624
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ahrens, J. F. 1985. Phytotoxicity of selected industrial use herbicides in root zones of ornamental plants. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 39:256–258.Google Scholar
2. Ahrens, J. F. and Cubanski, M. 1985. Evaluation of postemergence grass herbicides in conifer seedbeds and Christmas trees. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 33:243–246.Google Scholar
3. Fletcher, W. W. 1983. Recent advances in weed research. Commonw. Agric. Bur. 266 pp.Google Scholar
4. Haramaki, C. and Kuhns, L. J. 1985. Selected grass herbicides for woody ornamental liners. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 39:239–242.Google Scholar
5. Haramaki, C. and Kuhns, L. J. 1985. Tolerance of bedding plants to selected grass herbicides. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 39:231–234.Google Scholar
6. Himmelstein, F. J. and Bhowmik, P. C. 1985. Control of annual grasses in seedling alfalfa with early and late postemergence applications of grass herbicides. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 39:32.Google Scholar
7. Ilnicki, R. D. and Bitolo, D. B. 1986. Application schedules of AC 263,499 alone and in combination with acetanilide herbicides. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 40:68.Google Scholar
8. Lawson, H. M. 1974. The effects of weeds on fruit and ornamental crops. Proc. of the 12th Br. Weed Control Conf. Pages 1159–1169.Google Scholar
9. Robers, H. A. 1976. Weed competition in vegetable crops. Proc. of the Assoc. of Appl. Biologists. 83:321–347.Google Scholar
10. Zimdahl, R. L. 1980. Weed-crop competition, a review. Int. Plant Protection Ctr., Oregon State Univ., 196 pp.Google Scholar