Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-29T14:49:38.196Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Geyer Larkspur Phenology and Response to 2,4-D

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

D. N. Hyder  and
L. D. Sabatka
D. N. Hyder
Affiliation:
Plant Sci. Res. Div., Agr. Res. Ser., U. S. Dep. of Agr.
L. D. Sabatka
Affiliation:
Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, Colorado 80521
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mortality rates of Geyer larkspur (Delphinium geyeri Greene), a poisonous plant, were determined after spraying with (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid at various stages of plant development in 1967 to 1969. Sprays of 2,4-D at 2.2 kg/ha were more effective at early than at late stages of development, but seldom exceeded 40% mortality. Uneven-aged stands and early drying (dormancy) of small non-flowering plants often prevented the exposure of all plants to a single application of spray; treated plants contorted but continued growth for 5 to 8 weeks after spraying; residual seed provided a source of new plants; and previously dormant rootstock buds gave rise to new shoot and root growth the year after spraying. These characteristics and escape mechanisms direct attention to possibilities of improving effectiveness by spraying two or three times in a single season.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , January 1972 , pp. 31 - 33
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Alley, H. P. and Lee, G. A. 1971. Larkspur (Delphinium geyeri Greene) control resulting from application of picloram + 2,4-D and picloram + 2,4,5-T combinations. Res. Prog. Rep., West. Soc. Weed Sci. p. 17.Google Scholar
2. Alley, H. P. and Lee, G. A. 1971. Larkspur (Delphinium geyeri Greene) control resulting from three successive years treatment with two formulations of 2,4-D. Res. Prog. Rep., West. Soc. Weed Sci. p. 18.Google Scholar
3. Anonymous. 1970. Selected weeds of the United States. Agri. Handb. No. 366. U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. 463 p.Google Scholar
4. Binns, W., James, L. F., and Johnson, A. E. 1971. Control of larkspur with herbicides plus nitrogen fertilizer. J. Range Manage. 24:110–113.Google Scholar
5. Harrington, H. D. 1954. Manual of the Plants of Colorado. Sage Books, Denver, Colorado. 666 p.Google Scholar
6. Hyder, D. N., Sneva, F. A. and Calvin, L. D. 1956. Chemical control of sagebrush larkspur. J. Range Manage. 9:184–186.Google Scholar
7. Hyder, D. N. 1971. Species susceptibilities to 2,4-D on mixed-grass prairie. Weed Sci. 19: (In Press).Google Scholar
8. Torell, P and Haas, R. H. 1963. Herbicidal control of tall larkspur. Weeds 11:10–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Williams, M. C. and Cronin, E. H. 1968. Dormancy, longevity, and germination of seed of three larkspur and western false helebore. Weed Sci. 16:381–384.Google Scholar