Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:30:54.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Control of Leafy Spurge (Euphorbia esula) in Nebraska with the Spurge Hawkmoth (Hyles euphorbiae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

J. R. Forwood  and
M. K. McCarty
J. R. Forwood
Affiliation:
Agronomy Dep. Kansas State Univ., Manhattan KS 66506
M. K. McCarty
Affiliation:
Agric. Res., Sci. Ed. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric., Lincoln, NE 68583
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The feasibility of using the spurge hawkmoth (Hyles euphorbiae L., Lepidoptera: Sphingidae), as a biological control agent on leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.) was evaluated. Studies relating adult hawkmoth emergence from the pupal stage and spring growth of leafy spurge plants showed that the plants would provide food and oviposition sites for the insect. Two generations of the insect may occur each year. Winter temperatures at approximately 2.5 cm below the soil surface or in the litter would result in some mortality of hawkmoth pupae. Pupal release programs indicated that protection from insect and rodent predators was necessary for adult emergence to occur. Predator determination using 32P indicated two specimens of Calosoma calidum Fab. and two specimens of Formica subsericea Say as possible predators. Predator determination using pitfall traps showed that several species listed by Canadian researchers as predators were present in leafy spurge stands in Nebraska. At this time it appears the spurge hawkmoth will not become a valuable biological control agent for leafy spurge in Nebraska.

Keywords

Biological controlrelease program
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , May 1980 , pp. 235 - 240
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Baker, Lawrence and Anderson, H. 1974. To biologically control a noxious weed … leafy spurge hawkmoth. Now. 10:3–5. Montana State Univ., Coll. Agric., Bozeman, Montana.Google Scholar
2. Harris, P. and Alex, J. 1971. Euphorbia esula L., leafy spurge, and E. cyparrissias L., cypress spurge (Euphorbiaceae). Biological control programmes against insects and weeds in Canada, 1959–1968. Tech. Commun. no. 4, Commonw. Inst. Biol. Control, Trinidad. 83–88.Google Scholar
3. Hodgson, J. M. and Rees, N. 1976. Dispersal of Rhinocyllus conicus for biocontrol of musk thistle. Weed Sci. 24:59–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Holloway, J. K. 1964. Projects in biological control of weeds. Pages 656–660 in DeBach, P., ed. Biological Control of Insect Pests and Weeds. Chapman and Hall Ltd. London. 844 pp.Google Scholar
5. Jeffery, L. S. and Robison, L. R. 1969. Know and control, leafy spurge in Nebraska. Cooperative Extension Service, Univ. of Nebraska, Coll. Agric. and Home Econ., and U.S. Dep. Agric. Coop. E.C. 69–186.Google Scholar
6. Kingsley, K. K. January and February 1976. Controlling tansy ragwort. Oregon State Univ. Ext. Serv. Review. 47(1):16–17.Google Scholar
7. Kok, L. T. and Surles, W. W. 1975. Successful biocontrol of musk thistle by an introduced weevil, Rhinocyllus conicus . Environ. Entomol. 4(6):1025–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. New, T. R. 1971. The consumption of Euphorbia cyparissias (Euphorbiaceae) by larvae of Celerio euphorbia (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae.). Can. Entomol. 103:59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Surles, W. W., Kok, L. T., and Pienkowski, R. L. 1974. Rhinocyllus conicus establishment for biocontrol of thistles in Virginia. Weed Sci. 22:1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar