Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T01:12:12.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Canopy and Chemistry of Pasture Weeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. J. Carlisle ,
V. H. Watson  and
A. W. Cole
R. J. Carlisle
Affiliation:
Mississippi Agric. and For. Exp. Stn., Mississippi State, MS 39762
V. H. Watson
Affiliation:
Mississippi Agric. and For. Exp. Stn., Mississippi State, MS 39762
A. W. Cole
Affiliation:
Mississippi Agric. and For. Exp. Stn., Mississippi State, MS 39762
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Morphological and chemical characteristics of 11 warm season pasture weed species were defined. Goldenrod (Solidago altissima L.) was significantly taller and common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) had the largest canopy diameter of the 11 species studied. Species ranged from 14 to 134 cm in height with canopy diameters of 25 to 70 cm. No direct correlation was found between individual leaf size and total leaf area. Macro- and micromineral content varied widely among species but all values obtained were considered high enough to meet the requirements of ruminant animals. Redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) and horsenettle (Solanum carolinense L.) contained potentially toxic levels of nitrate. Five of the 11 species contained sufficient crude protein for ruminants and six of the 11 species were more than 50% digestible. Digestible energy values averaged 1.9 Mcal/kg for the 11 weeds evaluated.

Keywords

Forage qualitymineral compositioncrude proteindigestible energycanopy diameter
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , March 1980 , pp. 139 - 141
Copyright
Copyright © 1980 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bailey, Jr., Murl, E. 1978. Physiologic responses of livestock to toxic plants. J. Range Manage. 31:343–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bradley, W. B., Eppson, H. R., and Beath, O. A. 1940. Livestock poisoning by oat hay and other plants containing nitrate. Wyoming Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 241. 20 pp.Google Scholar
3. Bremner, J. M. 1965. Total nitrogen. in Black, C. A., ed. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. Am. Soc. Agron. Inc. Publisher, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
4. Campbell, E. G. 1924. Nitrogen content of weeds. Bot. Gaz. 78. 103–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Cullison, Arthur E. 1975. Feed and Feeding. Reston Publishing Company Inc., Reston, Virginia 486 pp.Google Scholar
6. Goering, H. K. and Van Soest, P. J. 1970. Forage fiber analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures, and some applications). Agric. Handb. No. 379. ARS-USDA, Beltsville, Maryland.Google Scholar
7. Horwitz, William. 1965. Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. 10th ed. Assoc. Off. Agric. Chemists, Washington, D.C. 956 pp.Google Scholar
8. Jackson, M. L. 1958. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliff, New Jersey. 498 pp.Google Scholar
9. Johnson, J. R. and Nichols, J. T. 1970. Plants of the South Dakota grasslands. South Dakota Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 566. 163 pp.Google Scholar
10. Kingsbury, J. M. 1964. Poisonous plants of the United States and Canada. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. 589 pp.Google Scholar
11. Marten, G. C. and Andersen, R. N. 1975. Forages nutritive value and palatability of 12 common annual weeds. Crop Sci. 15:821–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Muenscher, Walter Conrad. 1951. Poisonous plants of the United States. The Macmillian Co. New York, New York. 277 pp.Google Scholar
13. National Research Council. 1974. Nutrient and toxic substances in water for livestock and poultry. Nat. Acad. Sci. Washington, DC. pp. 60–61.Google Scholar
14. Nielsen, Darwin B. 1978. The economic impact of poisonous plants on the range livestock industry in the 17 western states. J. Range Manage. 31:325–328.Google Scholar
15. Sherrod, L. B. 1971. Nutritive value of Kochia scoparia . Agron. J. 63:343–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Siegmund, O. H., ed. 1973. Merck Veterinary Manual, 4th ed. Merck and Co., Inc. Rahway, New Jersey. 1618 pp.Google Scholar
17. Vengris, Jonas, Drike, M., Colby, Wm. G., and Bart, J. 1952. Chemical composition of weeds and accompanying crop plants. Agron. J. 45:213–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Watson, Vance H. 1976. Weed control and nutritonal benefits of Banvel and Weedmaster in warm season grass pastures. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 29:142.Google Scholar
19. Woo, M. L. 1919. Chemical constituents of Amaranthus retroflexus . Bot. Gaz. 78:103–115.Google Scholar