Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T10:49:03.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Color and luminance increment thresholds in poor readers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2008

STEPHEN J. DAIN ,
RICHARD A. FLOYD  and
ROBERT T. ELLIOT
STEPHEN J. DAIN*
Affiliation:
University of New South Wales, School of Optometry and Vision Science, Sydney, Australia
RICHARD A. FLOYD
Affiliation:
University of New South Wales, School of Optometry and Vision Science, Sydney, Australia
ROBERT T. ELLIOT
Affiliation:
University of New South Wales, School of Education Studies,Sydney, Australia
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Stephen J. Dain, University of New South Wales, School of Optometry and Vision Science, Sydney, New South Wales NSW 2052, Australia. E-mail: s.dain@unsw.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The hypotheses of a visual basis to reading disabilities in some children have centered around deficits in the visual processes displaying more transient reponses to stimuli although hyperactivity in the visual processes displaying sustained reponses to stimuli has also been proposed as a mechanism. In addition, there is clear evidence that colored lenses and/or colored overlays and/or colored backgrounds can influence performance in reading and/or may assist in providing comfortable vision for reading and, as a consequence, the ability to maintain reading for longer. As a consequence, it is surprising that the color vision of poor readers is relatively little studied. We assessed luminance increment thresholds and equi-luminous red-green and blue-yellow increment thresholds using a computer based test in central vision and at 10° nasally employing the paradigm pioneered by King-Smith. We examined 35 poor readers (based on the Neale Analysis of Reading) and compared their performance with 35 normal readers matched for age and IQ. Poor readers produced similar luminance contrast thresholds for both foveal and peripheral presentation compared with normals. Similarly, chromatic contrast discrimination for the red/green stimuli was the same in normal and poor readers. However, poor readers had significantly lower thresholds/higher sensitivity for the blue/yellow stimuli, for both foveal and peripheral presentation, compared with normal readers. This hypersensitivity in blue-yellow discrimination may point to why colored lenses and overlays are often found to be effective in assisting many poor readers.

Keywords

DyslexiaMagnocellular systemTransient systemColorReading
Type
Research Article
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , May 2008 , pp. 481 - 486
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chioran, G.M., Sellers, K.L., Benes, S.C., Lubow, M., Dain, S.J. & King-Smith, P.E. (1985). Color mixture thresholds measured on a color television—a new method for analysis, classification and diagnosis of neuro-ophthalmic disease. Documenta Ophthalmologica 61, 119–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farmer, M.E. & Klein, R.M. (1995). The evidence for a temporal processing deficit linked to dyslexia: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2, 460–493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Floyd, R.A., Dain, S.J. & Elliott, R.T. (2004). Heterochromatic flicker photometry and brightness matching in poor readers and normal controls. Vision Research 44, 221–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogben, J.H. (1996). A plea for purity. Australian Journal of Psychology 48, 172–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irlen, H. (1991). Reading by the Colors. New York: Avery Publishing Group Inc.Google Scholar
Ishihara, S. (1979). Tests for Color Blindness. London: H.K. Lewis and Co., Ltd.Google Scholar
Keen, A.G. & Lovegrove, W.J. (2000). Transient deficit hypothesis and dyslexia: Examination of whole-parts relationship, retinal sensitivity, and spatial and temporal frequencies. Vision Research 40, 705–715.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lorusso, M.L., Facoetti, A., Pesenti, S., Cattaneo, C., Molteni, M. & Geiger, G. (2004). Wider recognition in peripheral vision common to different subtypes of dyslexia. Vision Research 44, 2413–2424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lovegrove, W.J., Garzia, R.P. & Nicholson, S.B. (1990). Experimental evidence for a transient system deficit in specific reading disability. (Review). Journal of the American Optometric Association 61, 137–146.Google Scholar
Lovegrove, W.J., Heddle, M. & Slaghuis, W. (1980). Reading disability: Spatial frequency specific deficits in visual information store. Neuropsychologia 18, 111–115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meares, O. (1980). Figure/background, brightness/contrast and reading disabilities. Visible Language 14, 13–29.Google Scholar
Mollon, J.D. & Baker, M.R. (1995). The use of CRT displays in research on color vision. In Color Vision Deficiencies XII, ed. Drum, B., pp. 423–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neale, M.D. (1988). Neale Analysis of Reading (Revised). Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
Raven, J.C. (1938). Progressive Matrices: A Perceptual Test of Intelligence. London: H.K. Lewis.Google Scholar
Raven, J.C. (1989). Standard Progressive Matrices (Revised); Sets A, B, C, D and E. Hawthorn, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
Rutter, M. & Yule, W. (1975). The concept of specific reading retardation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines 16, 181–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellers, K.L., Chioran, G.M., Dain, S.J., Benes, S.C., Lubow, M., Rammohan, K. & King-Smith, P.E. (1986). Red-green mixture thresholds in congenital and acquired color defects. Vision Research 26, 1083–1097.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skottun, B.C. & Skoyles, J. (2007). Yellow filters, magnocellular responses, and reading. International Journal of Neuroscience 117, 287–293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanley, G. & Hall, R. (1973a). A comparison of dyslexics and normals in recalling letter arrays after brief presentation. British Journal of Education Psychology 43, 301–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanley, G. & Hall, R. (1973b). Short-term visual information processing in dyslexics. Child Development 44, 841–844.Google ScholarPubMed
Stark, L.W., Giveen, S.C. & Terdiman, J.F. (1991). Specific dyslexia and eye movements. In Vision and Visual Dyslexia, ed. Stein, J.F., pp. 203–232. Hampshire: The MacMillan Press Ltd.Google Scholar
Wilkins, A.J. (2003). Reading through Color. Wiley: Chichester.Google Scholar
Wilkins, A., Huang, J. & Cao, Y. (2004). Visual stress theory and its application to reading and reading tests. Journal of Research in Reading 27, 152–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar