Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T14:04:36.448Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Theory of Social Justice?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Barry, B., Democracy, Power and Justice: Essays in Political Theory, Oxford, 1989. Hereafter DPJ.Google Scholar

2 Barry, B., Theories of Justice, London, 1989. Hereafter ToJ.Google Scholar

3 Barry, B., Political Argument, London, 1965Google Scholar. See also DPJ, ch. 1.

4 Sen, A. K., ‘The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal’, Journal of Political Economy, lxxviii (1970), 152–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 Fried, C., Right and Wrong, Cambridge, Mass., 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 DPJ, chs. 4 and 5.

7 Barry, B., The Liberal Theory of Justice, Oxford, 1973.Google Scholar

8 See e.g. Darwell, S. L., Impartial Reason, Ithaca, 1983.Google Scholar

9 See e.g. Kearns, D., ‘A Theory of Justice and Love: Rawls on the Family’, Politics, xviii (1983), 3642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10 Rawls, J., ‘Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory’, Journal of Philosophy, lxxvii (1980), 515–72.Google Scholar

11 See Gewirth, A., Reason and Morality, Chicago, 1978Google Scholar, and Human Rights: Essays on Justification and Applications, Chicago, 1982.Google Scholar

12 Barry, B., ‘Review of Anarchy, State and Utopia’, Political Theory, iii (1975).Google Scholar

13 Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice, Oxford, 1971.Google Scholar

14 Particularly DPJ, ch. 18.

15 Barry makes this point explicitly against Gauthier. See Gauthier, D., Morals By Agreement, Oxford, 1986.Google Scholar