Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Twins as Participants in Randomized Controlled Trials: A Review of Published Literature

  • Athula Sumathipala (a1) (a2) (a3), Lisa Yelland (a4) (a5), Debra Green (a2), Tom Shepherd (a1), Kaushalya Jayaweera (a3), Paulo Ferreira (a6) and Jeffrey M. Craig (a7)...

Abstract

Monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins participate in research that partitions variance in health, disease, and behavior into genetic and environmental components. However, there are other innovative roles for twins in medical research. One such way is involving MZ and/or DZ twins in co-twin control-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs). To our knowledge, no reviews have been conducted that summarizes the involvement of twins in RCTs. Therefore, we conducted a systematic literature search using the U.S. Clinical Trials Database, NHS electronic databases, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsychINFO for RCTs on publications involving MZ and/or DZ twins as RCT participants. Out of the 186,027 clinical trials registered in the U.S. clinical trial register ClinicaTrails.gov, only six RCTs used twins as participants. From 1,598 articles identified in our search, 50 peer-reviewed English language publications met our pre-defined inclusion criteria. Sample sizes for RCTs have ranged from a total number of participants from 2 to 1,162; however, 32 (64%) studies had a sample size of 100 or less, and of those, 12 (24%) had fewer than 10. Both MZ and DZ twins have been recruited to the RCTs. In most instances (33/50) each twin from a pair were assigned to different study arms. Most of those studies included MZ twins only. Despite the methodological advantages, the use of MZ and DZ twins as participants in interventional RCTs appeared limited. The continuous development of innovative twin designs, especially RCTs, indicates that twin research can extend beyond the more widely recognized heritability estimates.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Twins as Participants in Randomized Controlled Trials: A Review of Published Literature
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Twins as Participants in Randomized Controlled Trials: A Review of Published Literature
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Twins as Participants in Randomized Controlled Trials: A Review of Published Literature
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

address for correspondence: Professor Athula Sumathipala, Research Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK. E-mail: a.sumathipala@keele.ac.uk

References

Hide All
Altman, D. G. (1991). Practical statistics for medical research. London, England: Chapman & Hall.
Bernardo, J., Nowacki, A., Martin, R., Fanaroff, J. M., & Hibbs, A. M. (2015). Multiples and parents of multiples prefer same arm randomization of siblings in neonatal trials. Journal of Perinatology, 35, 208213.
Boomsma, D., Busjahn, A., & Peltonen, L. (2002). Classical twin studies and beyond. Nature Reviews Genetics, 3, 872882.
Buchwald, D., Kaprio, J., Hopper, J. L., Sung, J., Goldberg, J., Fortier, I., . . . Harris, J. R. (2014). International Network of Twin Registries (INTR): Building a platform for international collaboration. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 17, 574577.
Carr, A., Martin, N., & Whitfield, J. (1981). Usefulness of the co-twin control design in investigations as exemplified in a study of effects of ascorbic acid on laboratory test results. Clinical Chemistry, 27, 14691470.
Hur, Y.-M., & Craig, J. M. (2013). Twin registries worldwide: An important resource for scientific research. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 112.
Jadad, A. R. (1998). Randomised controlled trials: A user's guide. London, England: BMJ Books.
Jelenkovic, A., Hur, Y. M., Sund, R., Yokoyama, Y., Siribaddana, S. H., Hotopf, M., . . . Silventoinen, K. (2016). Genetic and environmental influences on adult human height across birth cohorts from 1886 to 1994. eLife, 5, 14.
Jelenkovic, A., Yokoyama, Y., Sund, R., Honda, C., Bogl, L. H., Aaltonen, S., . . . Silventoinen, K. (2015). Zygosity differences in height and body mass index of twins from infancy to old age: A study of the CODATwins Project. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 18, 557570.
Martin, N., Carr, A., Oakeshott, J., & Clark, P. (1982). Co-twin control studies: Vitamin C and the common cold. Progress in Clinical and Biological Research, 103, 365373.
Miller, P. W., Mulvey, C., Martin, N., Miller, P., Mulvey, C., & Martin, N. (1995). What do twins studies reveal about the economic returns to education? A comparison of Australian and U.S. findings. American Economic Review, 85, 586599.
Plomin, R., & Haworth, C. M. A. (2010). Genetics and Intervention Research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 557563.
Sibbald, B., & Roland, M. (1998). Understanding controlled trials. Why are randomised controlled trials important? BMJ, 316, 201.
Silventoinen, K., Jelenkovic, A., Sund, R., Honda, C., Aaltonen, S., Yokoyama, Y., & Kaprio, J. (2015). The CODATwins Project: The cohort description of collaborative project of development of anthropometrical measures in twins to study macro-environmental variation in genetic and environmental effects on anthropometric traits. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 18, 348360.
Silventoinen, K., Jelenkovic, A., Sund, R., Hur, Y.-M., Yokoyama, Y., Honda, C., . . . Kaprio, J. (2016). Genetic and environmental effects on body mass index from infancy to the onset of adulthood: An individual-based pooled analysis of 45 twin cohorts participating in the COllaborative project of Development of Anthropometrical measures in Twins (CODATwins) study. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 104, 371379.
van Dongen, J., Slagboom, P. E., Draisma, H. H. M., Martin, N. G., & Boomsma, D. I. (2012). The continuing value of twin studies in the omics era. Nature Reviews. Genetics, 13, 640653.
Yelland, L. N., Sullivan, T. R., Price, D. J., & Lee, K. J. (2017). Sample size calculations for randomised trials including both independent and paired data. Statistics in Medicine, 36, 12271239.
Yokoyama, Y., Jelenkovic, A., Sund, R., Sung, J., Hopper, J. L., Ooki, S., . . . Silventoinen, K. (2016). Twin's birth-order differences in height and body mass index from birth to old age: A pooled study of 26 twin cohorts participating in the CODATwins Project. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 19, 112124.

Keywords

Twins as Participants in Randomized Controlled Trials: A Review of Published Literature

  • Athula Sumathipala (a1) (a2) (a3), Lisa Yelland (a4) (a5), Debra Green (a2), Tom Shepherd (a1), Kaushalya Jayaweera (a3), Paulo Ferreira (a6) and Jeffrey M. Craig (a7)...

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed