Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:32:30.273Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stillbirth Rates in Singletons, Twins and Triplets in Sweden, 1869 to 2001

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2012

Johan Fellman*
Affiliation:
Folkhälsan Institute of Genetics, Population Genetics Unit, Helsinki, Finland. johan.fellman@shh.fi
Aldur W. Eriksson
Affiliation:
Folkhälsan Institute of Genetics, Population Genetics Unit, Helsinki, Finland.
*
*Address for correspondence: Johan Fellman, Folkhälsan Institute of Genetics, Population Genetics Unit, POB 211, FIN-00251 Helsinki, Finland.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The temporal variation in the stillbirth rates (SBR), measured as the number of stillborn per 1000 total births, among singletons, twins and triplets was studied on Swedish birth data for the period 1869 to 2001 and comparisons with data from other populations were made. Among both single and multiple births there were marked, almost monotonously decreasing trends in the stillbirth rates. Among singletons the stillbirth rate decreased from 29.5 per 1000 in the period 1869 to 1878 to 3.4 in the period 1991 to 2001. Among twins the stillbirth rate decreased from 94 per 1000 in 1869 to 1878 to a minimum of 8.2 in 1991 to 2001 and among triplets from 166 per 1000 to a minimum of 19.8. The relative declining pattern in the SBRs was almost the same, being 88% among singletons, 91% among twins and 88% among triplets. In the 1980s and 1990s the definition of the stillbirth rate was changed in many countries, including Finland, but no changes in the definition of stillbirths have been made in Sweden. The effect of the artificial reproduction techniques, including in vitro fertilization, on the rates of multiple maternities is also discussed. It was noted especially that they had a more marked effect on the triplet than on the twinning rate.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006