Somatic and psychological health is a hot topic in the research of adolescence. In previous research, a number of studies have investigated adolescents’ somatic and psychological health by using twin samples (Boomsma et al., Reference Boomsma, Beem, van den Berg, Dolan, Koopmans, Vink and Slagboom2000; Hansell et al., Reference Hansell, Wright, Medland, Davenport, Wray and Hickie2012; Hettema et al., Reference Hettema, Neale, Myers, Prescott and Kendler2006; Kendler et al., Reference Kendler, Gatz, Gardner and Pedersen2006; Vassend et al., Reference Vassend, Roysamb and Nielsen2012; Wright & Martin, Reference Wright and Martin2004; Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Goldberg and Vaccarino2013). Among these studies, somatic and psychological health report (SPHERE) is an instrument that has been widely used to measure adolescents’ somatic and psychological distress (Gillespie et al., Reference Gillespie, Zhu, Heath, Hickie and Martin2000; Hansell et al., Reference Hansell, Wright, Medland, Davenport, Wray and Hickie2012; Okbay et al., Reference Okbay, Baselmans, De Neve, Turley, Nivard and Fontana2016; Rietschel et al., Reference Rietschel, Zhu, Kirschbaum, Strohmaier, Wüst, Rietschel and Martin2014; Wijeratne et al., Reference Wijeratne, Hickie and Davenport2006). The items of the SPHERE were derived from four self-report questionnaires (the 30-item version of the General Health Questionnaire, the Neurasthenia Symptom Questionnaire, the Diagnostic Interview Schedule self-report module for somatoform disorders, and the Schedule of Fatigue and Anergia; Wijeratne et al., Reference Wijeratne, Hickie and Davenport2006). There are three response choices for each item: sometimes/never (coded as zero), often (coded as one), and most of the time (coded as one). A total score of all the 34 items describes the overall mental health and well-being. The SPHERE can also yield subscale scores independently measuring somatic distress, psychological distress, affective symptoms of depression/anxiety, somatic distress, fatigue, neurasthenia, and somatization (Hickie et al., Reference Hickie, Davenport, Hadzi-Pavlovic, Koschera, Naismith, Scott and Wilhelm2001). The reliability and validity of the SPHERE have been well established in Western studies (Hansell et al., Reference Hansell, Wright, Medland, Davenport, Wray and Hickie2012; Hickie et al., Reference Hickie, Davenport, Hadzi-Pavlovic, Koschera, Naismith, Scott and Wilhelm2001; Rietschel et al., Reference Rietschel, Zhu, Kirschbaum, Strohmaier, Wüst, Rietschel and Martin2014; Wijeratne et al., Reference Wijeratne, Hickie and Davenport2006). However, until now, no study has examined whether this scale can be applied in Eastern adolescents or not. Therefore, the present study seeks to do a psychometric evaluation of the SPHERE by using a Chinese adolescent sample.

Results

Descriptive statistics of the subscale scores and scores for each item are shown in Table 1. The analysis of reliability indicated that the internal consistencies of this scale was good (for SPHERE, α = 0.97; for somatic distress, α = 0.83; for psychological distress, α = 0.89; for depression/anxiety, α = 0.94; for somatic distress, α = 0.89; for fatigue, α = 0.87; for neurasthenia, α = 0.93; and for somatization, α = 0.92). The split-half reliabilities were good as well (for SPHERE, α = 0.96; for somatic distress, α = 0.82; for psychological distress, α = 0.89; for depression/anxiety, α = 0.93; for somatic distress, α = 0.88; for fatigue, α = 0.85; for neurasthenia, α = 0.94; and for somatization, α = 0.94). The validities of the SPHERE were tested by using the item-total correlations (Hubel et al., Reference Hubel, Hagell and Sivberg2008). The results indicated that the item-total correlations were acceptable for all the subscales of the SPHERE (all the values were higher than 0.20).

TABLE 1 Descriptive Data