Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T05:30:58.602Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Heritability of the Second to Fourth Digit Ratio (2d:4d): A Twin Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2012

Simon N. Paul
Affiliation:
Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology Unit, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Bernet S. Kato
Affiliation:
Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology Unit, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Lynn F. Cherkas
Affiliation:
Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology Unit, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Toby Andrew
Affiliation:
Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology Unit, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Tim D. Spector*
Affiliation:
Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology Unit, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom. tim.spector@kcl.ac.uk
*
*Address for correspondence: Professor TD Spector,Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology Unit, St Thomas' Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The second to fourth finger length ratio (2d:4d) has been the subject of much recent work and is thought to be related to diverse gender and hormone-related traits including sports ability, disease susceptibility, attractiveness and sexuality. It is established in utero and remains constant in adulthood. Familial clustering has been thought to contribute to the development of 2d:4d from early studies but no twin studies exploring heritability have been reported to date. In this study, a sample of 456 female twin pairs (148 monozygotic [MZ], 308 dizygotic [DZ]) aged 18 to 79 years was used to estimate the heritability of 2d:4d for the right and left hands. Finger lengths were derived from hand xrays. Variance components analysis was used to estimate and contrast genetic and environmental effects on this phenotype. The mean 2d:4d was 0.92 (SD = 0.001) for both hands. The MZ intraclass correlation was higher than in DZ (.66 vs. .35 for right 2d:4d, and .71 vs. .37 for left 2d:4d). The best fit model included additive polygenic and unique environmental effects (‘AE’ model), with no significant common environmental effects detected. Heritability was estimated to be approximately 66% for 2d:4d (95% confidence interval 0.5–0.78). These results suggest a substantial genetic contribution to the determination of this hormonally related skeletal ratio in women, which could be more influential than the effects of common prenatal environmental factors. However the current study design does not preclude the possibility of confounding between heritability estimates and unobserved prenatal effects.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006