No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
‘Alte Musik’ or ‘Early Music’?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 February 2012
Abstract
An attempt to distinguish between ‘alte Musik’, as German musicians used to conceive it, and ‘early music’, as is now the common phrase in English, provides a new – and perhaps better – lens through which to view the old historical schisms of twentieth-century music. The recourse that musical innovators have always had to ancient precedents, as inspiration and as validation, has many variations, and these variations are reliable reflectors of aesthetic attitudes.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012
References
Scores, anthologies, and editions
Apel, Willi, ed. French Secular Music of the Late Fourteenth Century. Cambridge, MA: Mediaeval Academy of America, 1950.Google Scholar
Bach, J. S.Komm, Gott, Schöpfer, Heiliger Geist: Choralvorspiel, orchestrated by Schoenberg, Arnold. Vienna: Universal Edition, 1925.Google Scholar
Bach, J. S.Schmücke dich, O liebe Seele: Choralvorspiel, orchestrated by Schoenberg, Arnold. Vienna: Universal Edition, 1925.Google Scholar
Bach, J. S.Präludium und Fuge in Es-dur für Orgel (‘St Anne’, BWV552), transcribed for large orchestra by Schoenberg, Arnold. Vienna: Universal Edition, 1929.Google Scholar
Bach, J. S.Fuga Ricercata a 6 voci: No. 2 aus dem Musikalischen Opfer, transcribed for orchestra by Webern, Anton. Vienna: Universal Edition, 1935.Google Scholar
Bach, J. S.Choral-Variationen über das Weihnachtslied ‘Vom Himmel hoch da komm' ich her’, transcribed for mixed chorus and orchestra by Stravinsky, Igor. London: Boosey & Hawkes, 1956.Google Scholar
Davison, Archibald T., and Willi, Apel, eds. Historical Anthology of Music (1946), vol. 1: Oriental, Medieval and Renaissance Music, rev. edn.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Gesualdo, Carlo (di Venosa), completed by Stravinsky, Igor. Tres sacrae cantiones, for six and seven voices. New York: Boosey & Hawkes, 1960.Google Scholar
Isaac, Heinrich. Choralis Constantinus, book 2: Gradualer in mehrstimmiger Bearbeitung, ed. von Webern, Anton. Denkmäler der Tonkunst in Österreich 32 (Jahrgang 16/1). Vienna: Artaria, 1909.Google Scholar
Isaac, Heinrich. Choralis Constantinus, book 3, ed. Cuyler, Louise. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1950.Google Scholar
Parrish, Carl, ed. A Treasury of Early Music: an Anthology of Masterworks of the Middle Ages, the Renaissance, and the Baroque Era. New York: Norton, 1958.Google Scholar
Parrish, Carl and Ohl, John F., eds. Masterpieces of Music before 1750: an Anthology of Musical Examples from Gregorian Chant to J. S. Bach. New York: Norton, 1951.Google Scholar
Schering, Arnold, ed. Geschichte der Musik im Beispielen. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel, 1931.Google Scholar
Schoenberg, Arnold. Concerto for String Quartet and Orchestra, after the Concerto grosso Op. 6, no. 7 by G. F. Handel, freely transcribed by Schoenberg, Arnold. New York: Schirmer, 1935.Google Scholar
Schoenberg, Arnold. Concerto for Violoncello and Orchestra, after the Concerto for Clavicembalo composed in 1746 by G. M. Monn. New York: Schirmer, 1935.Google Scholar
Discography
Mozart, W. A.Fugue in C minor, K426. Igor Stravinsky and Soulima Stravinsky, pianos, rec. 14 and 16 February 1938. Stravinsky: Composer and Performer, vol. 2. 3 CD set, Andante RE-A-1100, 2008.Google Scholar
Schoenberg, Arnold. Cello Concerto, after G. M. Monn. Laurence Lesser, Columbia Symphony Orchestra, cond. Robert Craft. The Music of Arnold Schoenberg, vol. 8. 2 LP set, Columbia M2S 780, 1968.Google Scholar
Schoenberg, Arnold. Cello Concerto, after G. M. Monn. Yo-Yo Ma, Boston Symphony Orchestra, cond. Seiji Ozawa. Strauss Don Quixote / Schoenberg Concerto. LP, CBS IM 39863, 1985; CD, CBS MK39863, 1990.Google Scholar
Schoenberg, Arnold. Cello Concerto, after G. M. Monn. Mark Drobinsky, Yekaterinburg Orchestra, cond. Dmitriy Liss. Concertos revisités / Revisited Concertos. CD, VDE-Gallo CD-994, 1999.Google Scholar
Schoenberg, Arnold. Cello Concerto in D, after G. M. Monn. Fred Sherry, Philharmonia Orchestra, cond. Robert Craft. Arnold Schoenberg, vol. 7. CD, Koch International 3-7475-2, 2001.Google Scholar
Schubert, Franz, arr. Anton Webern. Deutsche Tänze D820. Frankfurter Funkorchester, cond. Webern, rec. 29 December 1932. Webern: Complete Works. 4 LP set, CBS 79402, 1978; 3 CD set, Sony SM3K 45845, 1991.Google Scholar
Bibliography
Adorno, Theodor W. ‘Bach gegen seine Liebhaber verteidigt’, in Kulturkritik und Gesellschaft, vol. 1: Prismen; Ohne Leitbild, ed. Tiedemann, Rolf. Gesammelte Schriften 10/1. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1977. 138–51. Trans. Samuel and Shierry Weber in Prisms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1967. 133–46.Google Scholar
Auner, Joseph, ed. A Schoenberg Reader: Documents of a Life. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Berry, Mark. ‘Romantic Modernism: Bach, Furtwängler, and Adorno’. New German Critique 35/2 (2008), 71–102.Google Scholar
Bilson, Malcolm. ‘The Viennese Fortepiano of the Late 18th Century’. Early Music 8/2 (1980), 158–62.Google Scholar
Boulez, Pierre. ‘Chromaticism’, in Stocktakings from an Apprenticeship, ed. Thévenin, Paule, trans. Walsh, Stephen. Oxford: Clarendon, 1991. 223–6.Google Scholar
Brand, Juliane, Christopher, Hailey, and Donald, Harris. The Berg–Schoenberg Correspondence: Selected Letters. New York: Norton, 1987.Google Scholar
Cone, Edward T.‘Editorial Responsibility and Schoenberg's Troublesome “Misprints”’. Perspectives of New Music 11/1 (1972), 65–75.Google Scholar
Cook, Susan C.Opera for a New Republic: the Zeitopern of Krenek, Weill, and Hindemith. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Craft, Robert. ‘Stravinsky's Mass: a Notebook’, in Stravinsky: a Merle Armitage Book, ed. Corle, Edwin. New York: Duell, Sloan, and Pearce, 1949. 201–6.Google Scholar
Craft, Robert. ‘Assisting Stravinsky: on a Misunderstood Collaboration’. Atlantic Monthly 250/6 (1982), 64–74.Google Scholar
Craft, Robert. Stravinsky: Chronicle of a Friendship, rev. and expanded edn.Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Dineen, P. Murray. ‘The Contrapuntal Combination: Schoenberg's Old Hat’, in Music Theory and the Exploration of the Past, ed. Hatch, Christopher and Bernstein, David W.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993. 435–47.Google Scholar
Forte, Allen. ‘Letter to the Editor in Reply to Richard Taruskin’. Music Analysis 5/2–3 (1986), 321–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Jay S.‘Talk with Stravinsky: Composer Discusses his Music’. New York Herald Tribune, 21 December 1952.Google Scholar
Heartz, Daniel. ‘Approaching a History of 18th-Century Music’. Current Musicology 9 (1969), 92–5.Google Scholar
Joseph, Charles M.Stravinsky Inside Out. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Lang, Paul Henry. ‘The Puzzle of Stravinsky’. New York Herald Tribune, 24 January 1960.Google Scholar
Lister, Rodney. Review of The Cambridge History of Twentieth-Century Music (2004) ed. Nicholas Cook and Anthony Pople, and The Oxford History of Western Music (2005) by Richard Taruskin. Tempo 235 (2006), 50–57.Google Scholar
Moldenhauer, Hans, and Rosaleen, Moldenhauer. Anton von Webern: a Chronicle of His Life and Work. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1979.Google Scholar
Pace, Ian. ‘Re: Russian Music and Taruskin’, Music and Society [online discussion board], 30 March 2009 <http://mas.nfshost.com/index.php?topic=115.15> (accessed 18 September 2009).+(accessed+18+September+2009).>Google Scholar
Podolski, Michel. ‘Le Juden Tanz: analyse et transcription’. Revue belge de musicologie 17 (1963), 29–38.Google Scholar
Puffett, Kathryn. ‘Structural Imagery: “Pierrot lunaire” Revisited’. Tempo 237 (2006), 2–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoenberg, Arnold. ‘Das Verhältnis zum Text’, in Der blaue Reiter, ed. Kandinsky, Wassily and Marc, Franz. Munich: Piper, 1912. 27–33. Trans. Dika Newlin as ‘The Relationship to the Text’, in Style and Idea. 141–4.Google Scholar
Schoenberg, Arnold. Style and Idea, ed. Stein, Leonard. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Schoenberg, Arnold. ‘Composition with Twelve Tones (2)’ (1946), in Style and Idea. 245–9.Google Scholar
Schoenberg, Arnold. ‘New Music, Outmoded Music, Style and Idea’ (1947), in Style and Idea 113–24.Google Scholar
Schoenberg, Arnold. ‘Today's Manner of Performing Classical Music’ (1948), in Style and Idea. 320–22.Google Scholar
Sherman, Bernard D. ‘Metronome Marks, Timings, and Other Period Evidence Regarding Tempo in Brahms’, in Performing Brahms: Early Evidence of Performing Style, ed. Musgrave, Michael and Sherman, Bernard D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. 99–130.Google Scholar
Straus, Joseph N.‘The “Anxiety of Influence” in Twentieth-Century Music’. Journal of Musicology 9/4 (1991), 430–47.Google Scholar
Straus, Joseph N.‘Stravinsky's Serial “Mistakes”’. Journal of Musicology 17/2 (1999), 231–71.Google Scholar
Stravinsky, Igor, and Craft, Robert. Memories and Commentaries. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1960.Google Scholar
Stravinsky, Igor, and Craft, Robert. Expositions and Developments. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stravinsky, Igor. Poetics of Music in the Form of Six Lessons, bilingual edn, trans. Knodel, Arthur and Dahl, Ingolf. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuckenschmidt, H. H.Arnold Schoenberg: His Life, World and Work, trans. Searle, Humphrey. New York: Schirmer Books, 1978.Google Scholar
Taruskin, Richard. ‘Russian Folk Melodies in The Rite of Spring’. Journal of the American Musicological Society 33/3 (1980), 501–43.Google Scholar
Taruskin, Richard. ‘Forum: Reply to van den Toorn’. In Theory Only 10/3 (1987), 47–57.Google Scholar
Taruskin, Richard. ‘The Pastness of the Present and the Presence of the Past’, in Authenticity and Early Music, ed. Kenyon, Nicholas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988. 137–213. Repr. in Taruskin, Text and Act. 90–155.Google Scholar
Taruskin, Richard. Text and Act: Essays on Music and Performance. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Taruskin, Richard. Stravinsky and the Russian Traditions: a Biography of the Works through Mavra. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taruskin, Richard. ‘Stravinsky and Us’, in The Cambridge Companion to Stravinsky, ed. Cross, Jonathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. 260–84. Repr. in The Danger of Music. 420–46.Google Scholar
Taruskin, Richard. The Danger of Music, and Other Anti-Utopian Essays. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Taruskin, Richard. The Oxford History of Western Music, vol. 4: Music in the Early Twentieth Century, rev. edn.New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Tymoczko, Dmitri. ‘Stravinsky and the Octatonic: a Reconsideration’. Music Theory Spectrum 24/1 (2002), 68–102.Google Scholar
Van der Merwe, Pieter. The Roots of the Classical. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Walsh, Stephen. Stravinsky: The Second Exile: France and America, 1934–71. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2006.Google Scholar
Webern, Anton. Der Weg zur neuen Musik, ed. Reich, Willi. Vienna: Universal Edition, 1960. Trans. Black, Leo as The Path to the New Music. Bryn Mawr, PA, and London: Theodore Presser/Universal Edition, 1963.Google Scholar
Weiss, Piero, and Taruskin, Richard. Music in the Western World: a History in Documents, 2nd edn.Belmont, CA: Thomson/Schirmer, 2007.Google Scholar
[Unsigned], , ‘A Feast for Musicians, Students and Casual Concert-Goers’. The Economist, 15–21August 2009, 75.Google Scholar