Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T14:12:53.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Logic programming in the context of multiparadigm programming: the Oz experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2003

PETER VAN ROY
Affiliation:
Université catholique de Louvain, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium (e-mail: pvr@info.ucl.ac.be)
PER BRAND
Affiliation:
Swedish Institute of Computer Science, S-164 28 Kista, Sweden (e-mail: perbrand@sics.se)
DENYS DUCHIER
Affiliation:
Universität des Saarlandes, D-66123 Saarbrücken, Germany (e-mail: Denys.Duchier@ps.uni-sb.de)
SEIF HARIDI
Affiliation:
Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), S-164 28 Kista, Sweden (e-mail: seif@imit.kth.se)
CHRISTIAN SCHULTE
Affiliation:
Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), S-164 28 Kista, Sweden (e-mail: schulte@imit.kth.se)
MARTIN HENZ
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore, Singapore 117543 (e-mail: henz@comp.nus.edu.sg)

Abstract

Oz is a multiparadigm language that supports logic programming as one of its major paradigms. A multiparadigm language is designed to support different programming paradigms (logic, functional, constraint, object-oriented, sequential, concurrent, etc.) with equal ease. This paper has two goals: to give a tutorial of logic programming in Oz; and to show how logic programming fits naturally into the wider context of multiparadigm programming. Our experience shows that there are two classes of problems, which we call algorithmic and search problems, for which logic programming can help formulate practical solutions. Algorithmic problems have known efficient algorithms. Search problems do not have known efficient algorithms but can be solved with search. The Oz support for logic programming targets these two problem classes specifically, using the concepts needed for each. This is in contrast to the Prolog approach, which targets both classes with one set of concepts, which results in less than optimal support for each class. We give examples that can be run interactively on the Mozart system, which implements Oz. To explain the essential difference between algorithmic and search programs, we define the Oz execution model. This model subsumes both concurrent logic programming (committed-choice-style) and search-based logic programming (Prolog-style). Furthermore, as consequences of its multiparadigm nature, the model supports new abilities such as first-class top levels, deep guards, active objects, and sophisticated control of the search process. Instead of Horn clause syntax, Oz has a simple, fully compositional, higher-order syntax that accommodates the abilities of the language. We give a brief history of Oz that traces the development of its main ideas and we summarize the lessons learned from this work. Finally, we give many entry points into the Oz literature.

Type
Regular Papers
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This paper is a much-extended version of the tutorial talk “Logic Programming in Oz with Mozart” given at the International Conference on Logic Programming, Las Cruces, New Mexico, November 1999. Some knowledge of traditional logic programming (with Prolog or concurrent logic languages) is assumed.