Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T08:21:58.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Unnatural Acts: Art and Passion on the Mid-Eighteenth-Century Stage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2009

Michael Shortland
Affiliation:
Michael ShortlandTeaches history and social studies of science in theUniversity of Oxford.

Extract

The so-called ‘theatrical revolution’ of the mid-eighteenth-century is generally hailed as the turning point in the history of English acting patterns, writing styles and playhouse management. As with any revolution, its origins and development have been described by leading participants from the viewpoint of the victor. It is a story of the pioneering labours of such figures as David Garrick and Charles Macklin rendering new performances, of old plays being reset and recast, of puffing up the pride and the prestige of the profession of actors and actresses. In true revolutionary manner, the accumulated weight of tradition which had borne down so heavily on individual talents, narrowing and stifling them, was cast aside. Under the banner of‘realism’ (in some accounts ‘naturalism’), a new generation of actors breathed life into dusty theatres and threw down the challenge of novelty: new styles, new acting manuals, new forms of expression, new representations on stage.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © International Federation for Theatre Research 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. See Nicoll, Allardyce, The English Theatre: A Short History (London, 1938)Google Scholar; Lynch, James Jeremiah, Box, Pit, and Gallery: Stage and Society in Johnson's London (Berkeley, 1953)Google Scholar; and Doran, John, ‘Their Majesties' Servants’; or, Annals of the English Stage from Thomas Betterton to Edmund Kean (London, 1897) for examples.Google Scholar

2. See Sennett, Richard, The Fall of Public Man (Cambridge, 1975), 38–9, 75–9, 191–3Google Scholar; Pedicord, H. W., The Theatrical Public in the Time of Garrick (New York, 1954), 4851Google Scholar; Nicoll, Allardyce, The Garrick Stage: Theatres and Audiences in the Eighteenth Century (Manchester, 1980), 78101Google Scholar; and Kitchin, Laurence, Mid-Century Drama (London, 1960).Google Scholar

3. Gentleman's Magazine, XLIII, 1773, 579Google Scholar; see also XXIII, 1753,31.

4. Quoted in Price, Cecil, Theatre in the Age of Garrick (Oxford, 1973), 88, 99.Google Scholar

5. See Pepys, Samuel, Everybody's Pepys: The Diary of Samuel Pepys 1660–1669, edited by Morshead, O. F. (London, 1926), 94, 129, 133, 135Google Scholar; Doran, , ‘Their Majesties'Servants’, 3745Google Scholar; and The English Dramatic Critics: An Anthology 1660–1932, edited by Agate, James (London, 1932), 45Google Scholar, for the views of Pepys, Dryden and Steele respectively.

6. Betterton, Thomas, The History of the English Stage, from the Restoration to the Present Time (London, 1741), 54Google Scholar. The authorship of this volume is uncertain: it probably consists of fragments patched together by William Oldys, Edmund Curll (its publisher), and others. For details, see Downer, Alan S., ‘Nature to Advantage Dressed: Eighteenth-Century Acting’, PMLA, LVIII, 1943, 1002–37 (p. 1007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7. Betterton, , History of the English Stage, 100–1.Google Scholar

8. The Spectator, 4 vols (London, 1967), I, 120–22 (16 04 1711)Google Scholar; Boswell, James, The Life of Samuel Johnson LL.D., edited by Hill, G. B. and Powell, L. F., 6 vols (Oxford, 19431950), I, 168Google Scholar; Hill, Aaron, The Fatal Vision: or, The Fall of Sian (London, 1716), vi.Google Scholar

9. This is the view of the Gentleman's Magazine, LIII, 1753, 758Google Scholar; similar cynicism may be found in other issues: VIII, 1738, 191–4; V, 1735, 662–3; and IX, 1739 135–7.

10. Smollett, Tobias, Peregrine Pickle, edited by Clifford, James L. (Oxford, 1969), chapter CII.Google Scholar

11. Quoted in Cooke, William, Memoirs of Samuel Foote, Esq., 3 vols (London, 1805), I, 38–9Google Scholar. For another statement of the sudden ‘naturalness’ of English acting, see Lewis (Luigi) Riccoboni, , An Historical and Critical Account of the Theatres in Europe (London, 1741), 176.Google Scholar

12. See Cooke, William, Memoirs of Charles Macklin, Comedian, with the Dramatic Characters, Manners, Anecdotes, etc. of the Age in which he Lived (London, 1804), 91–4, 283–4Google Scholar; and the later account of the performance in Lichtenberg's Visits to England as Described in his Letters and Diaries, edited by Mare, Margaret L. and Quarrell, W. H. (Oxford, 1938), 40.Google Scholar

13. See Lichtenberg's Visits, 627Google Scholar; and ‘Biographical Anecdotes of the Late Mr. Garrick’, Gentleman's Magazine, XLIX, 1779, 117–19, 171–3, 226–8, 280–2.Google Scholar

14. Cooke, , Memoirs of Macklin, 98–9Google Scholar; see also ‘Character of Mr. Garrick’, Gentleman's Magazine, XII, 1749, 527.Google Scholar

15. Fielding, Henry, The History of Tom Jones, A Foundling, edited by Bowers, Fredson and Battestin, Martin C., 2 vols (Oxford, 1974), book XVI, chapter 6.Google Scholar

16. The Prompter, 66, 27 06 1735.Google Scholar

17. See The Works of Aaron Hill, 4 vols (London, 1753), I, 368Google Scholar; Hill, John, The Actor: A Treatise on the Art of Playing (London, 1750), 20, 162, 233Google Scholar; Foote, Samuel, A Treatise on the Passions, so far as they regard the Stage (London, 1747), 10.Google Scholar

18. Foote, , Treatise on the Passions, 11.Google Scholar

19. Foote, , Treatise on the Passions, 13Google Scholar; Cooke, , Memoirs of Foote, II, 1920, 2432.Google Scholar

20. Reynolds, Joshua, The Literary Works, 2 vols (London, 1899), II, 333, 128Google Scholar; Discourses on Art, edited by Wark, Robert R. (New Haven, 1981), 170–71Google Scholar (Discourse IX, 1780) and 124 (Discourse VII, 1776).

21. Richardson, Jonathan, The Works (London, 1792), 162Google Scholar, also 23, 95. Similar remarks may be found in Gerard de Lairesse's influential treatise on The Art of Painting, in all its Branches (London, 1738), 102.Google Scholar

22. For some examples, see Taylor, Houghton W., ‘“Particular Character”: An Early Phase of a Literary Evolution’, PMLA, LX, 1945, 161–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar (pp. 166–67). The demand to improve upon Nature, and to deceive with that improvement, is backed by Blake in a letter to Butts, Thomas dated 22 11 1802Google Scholar, in The Letters of William Blake, edited by Keynes, G. (Oxford, 1980), 40–3.Google Scholar

23. See, for example, Discourses, 171 (Discourse XI, 1780)Google Scholar; 45 (Discourse III, 1770); and 232 (Discourse XIII, 1786).

24. The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke, edited by Willis, F. H., 6 vols (London, 1906), I, 165, 84.Google Scholar

25. Discourses, 78 (Discourse V, 1772)Google Scholar; 82 (Discourse V, 1772).

26. On this, see Hagstrum, J. H., The Sister Arts: The Tradition of Literary Pictorialism and English Poetry from Dryden to Gray (Chicago, 1958)Google Scholar; and Paul, and Alpers, Svetlana, ‘Ut Pictura Noesis? Criticism in Literary and Art History’, New Literary History, 3, 1972, 437–58.Google Scholar

27. Johnson, Samuel, The History of Rasselas Prime of Abissinia, edited by Tillotson, G. and Jenkins, B. (London, 1971), 28–9.Google Scholar

28. Rambler, 60 (13 10 1750)Google Scholar, in The Rambler, edited by Bate, W. J. and Strauss, Albrecht B., 3 vols (New Haven, 1968), III, 320.Google Scholar

29. Adventurer, 95 (2 10 1753)Google Scholar, in The Idler and Adventurer, edited by Bate, W. J., Bullitt, J. M. and Powell, L. F. (New Haven, 1967), 425.Google Scholar

30. See, for examples, Pickering, Roger, Reflections upon Theatrical Expression in Tragedy (London, 1755), 5661Google Scholar; and Cooke, William, Elemens de critique dramatique (Paris, 1800), 239.Google Scholar

31. See Bate, W. J., Negative Capability: The Intuitive Approach in Keats (Cambridge, Mass., 1939), 2578Google Scholar and idem, ‘The Sympathetic Imagination in Eighteenth-Century Criticism’, English Literary History, 12, 1945, 144–64.Google Scholar

32. ‘Essay on the Theatres: or, the Art of Acting’ (anonymous and written in mid-century), The Harleian Miscellany: A Collection of Scarce, Curious, and Entertaining Tracts, edited by Oldys, William and Park, Thomas, 10 vols (London, 18081813), V, 580–4 (pp. 581, 584).Google Scholar

33. Cooke, , Elemens de critique, xi, 324, 75, 124–5.Google Scholar

34. Compare pp. 3 and 18 of Pickering's Reflections upon Theatrical Expression.

35. This poem first appeared in The Prompter, then in the Gentleman's Magazine, V, 1735, 730Google Scholar. It is reproduced from the manuscript as ‘The Actor's Epitome’ in Beryl Smalley's ‘An Anonymous Poem of the Eighteenth Century’, Review of English Studies, 19, 1943, 70Google Scholar and it is from this source that I quote.

36. Hill, , Works, I, 355.Google Scholar

37. The most direct parallel occurs in Hill, 's Works, I, 402Google Scholar when he emphasizes the physiognomical power of the eye and its proximate regions; earlier, Hill, refers to ‘animal spirits’ (I, 355)Google Scholar. For a discusion of Le Brun's work and its relevance to the questions raised here, see Shortland, Michael, ‘Skin Deep: Batthes, Lavater and the Legible Body’, Economy and Society, XIV, 3, 1985, 273312CrossRefGoogle Scholar, where further references are provided.

38. Hogarth, William, The Analysis of Beauty (London, 1753), 127–9Google Scholar. A similar criticism was voiced by the important critic De Piles, Roger in The Art of Painting, with the Lives and Characters of about 500 of the most Eminent Painters (London, 1780), 341.Google Scholar

39. See Gentleman's Magazine, V, 1735, 314.Google Scholar

40. Hill, , The Actor, 167–8, 237–8.Google Scholar

41. Garrick, David, An Essay on Acting in which will be considered the Mimical Behaviour of a Certain Fashionable Faulty Actor (London, 1744).Google Scholar

42. See Shortland, Michael, ‘Moving Speeches: Language and Elocution in Eighteenth-Century Britain’, History of European Ideas, VIII, 1, 1987.Google Scholar

43. On this, see the famous studies by Lovejoy, A. D.: ‘“Nature” as Aesthetic Norm’, Modern Language Notes, XLII, 1927, 444–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Essays in the History of Ideas (Baltimore, 1948), 6978Google Scholar; The Great Chain of Being (Cambridge, Mass., 1978), 289–96Google Scholar; and, with Boas, George, Primitivism and Related Ideas in Antiquity (Baltimore, 1935), 447–56.Google Scholar

44. Diderot, Denis, ‘Observations de M. Diderot’ (15 10 1770)Google Scholar, and ‘Suite et fin des observations de M. Diderot’ (1 11 1770)Google Scholar, Correspondance litteraire, philosophique et critique par Grimm, Diderot, Raynal, Meister, etc., edited by Tourneaux, Maurice, 16 vols (Paris, 18771882), IX, 133–41, 149–58.Google Scholar

45. The Paradoxe appears in Diderot's Oeuvres esthétiques, edited by Vernière, Paul (Paris, 1959)Google Scholar. For Diderot's discussion of Hill, see pp. 292–4 and Belaval, Yvon, L'Esthétique sansparadoxe de Diderot (Paris, 1950). 165–73.Google Scholar

46. ‘Observations’, Correspondance litteraire, IX, 139Google Scholar. See also Diderot to Mile. Jodin (c. 1765) in Oeuvres complètes de Diderot, edited by Assezat, J. and Tourneaux, Maurice, 20 vols (Paris, 18751877), XIX, 389.Google Scholar

47. Such distinctions are also established in Diderot's article on Imitation for the Encyclopédic; see Gay, Peter, The Enlightenment: An Interpretation, 2 vols (London, 1970), II, 285.Google Scholar

48. Oeuvres esthétiques, 317.Google Scholar

49. On this, see Shortland, Michael, ‘Hypocrisy in England: Some Contours of an Historical Problem’, Studies in the History of Psychology and the Social Sciences, 3, 1986Google Scholar (in press) and idem., ‘Masks of Deceit: Aspects of Hypocrisy in Eighteenth-Century Narrative and Polities’, to appear in 1987 in Clio: A Journal of Literature, History and the Philosophy of History.

50. Sennett, , Fall of Public Man, esp. pp. 110–15.Google Scholar

51. Œuvres esthétiques, 328.Google Scholar