No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 May 2010
Eugenio Hernández Espinosa's María Antonia (1967) is regarded as one of the most important theatrical works to be produced during the first decade of the Cuban Revolution. Although most readings of the play tend to emphasize its investment in possession ceremonies (the use of santería rituals and symbols provoked a strong reaction from both audiences and critics), Hernández Espinosa's conflicted presentation of gender roles is what claims my attention in this article. By showing how María Antonia is unable to alter the strictures of machismo or successfully challenge hegemonic discourses of race and class, I argue that the play suggests that santería supports a social context in which female agency is seriously restricted, and may even be reduced to a utopian and self-destructive fantasy.
1 Turner, Victor, From Ritual to Theatre: The Human Seriousness of Play (New York: PAJ Publications, 1992), pp. 82, 86Google Scholar.
2 Lewis, I. M., Ecstatic Religion: A Study of Shamanism and Spirit Possession (London: Routledge, 1971), pp. 22–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
3 Bourguignon, Erika, ‘Ritual Dissociation and Possession Belief in Caribbean Negro Religion’, in Whitten, Norman E. and Sawed, John F., eds., Afro-American Anthropology: Contemporary Perspectives (New York: The Free Press, 1970), p. 95Google Scholar.
4 Barnet, Miguel, ‘La posesión’, Tablas, 4 (1996), pp. 14–15Google Scholar, here p. 15.
5 Matory, J. Loland, ‘Tradition, Transnationalism, and Gender in the Afro-Brazilian Candomblé’, in Sommer, Doris, ed., Cultural Agency in the Americas (Durham: Duke University Press, 2006), pp. 121–45Google Scholar.
6 Clark, Mary Ann, Where Men Are Wives and Mothers Rule: Santería Ritual Practices and Their Gender Implications (Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2005), p. 144Google Scholar.
7 Inés María Martiatu Terry, ‘Mythological and Ritual Theatre in Cuba’, Performance Research, 3, 3 (Winter 1998), pp. 53–9, here p. 54.
8 Ayorinde, Christine, Afro-Cuban Religiosity, Revolution, and National Identity (Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2004), pp. 83–106Google Scholar.
9 For a detailed account of Cuban activities in Africa see Gleijeses, Piero, Conflicting Missions: Havana, Washington, and Africa, 1959–1976 (Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 2002)Google Scholar.
10 Hearn, Adrian H., Cuba, Religion, Social Capital, and Development (Durham: Duke University Press, 2008), pp. 31–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
11 For a general study of this genre see Lane, Jill, Blackface Cuba, 1840–1995 (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2005)Google Scholar.
12 See Thomas, Susan, Cuban Zarzuela: Performing Race and Gender on Havana's Lyric Stage (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2009) pp. 40–80Google Scholar.
13 Espinosa, Eugenio Hernández, María Antonia, in Inés Terry, María Martiatu, ed., María Antonia: Una pasión compartida (La Habana: Editorial Letras Cubanas, 2004), p. 175Google Scholar. All translations from Spanish are mine.
14 Armando Correa, ‘Fuenteovejuna. María Antonia’, Tablas, 2 (1984), pp. 4–7, here p. 6.
15 Gerardo Mosquera, ‘Odebí, el cazador. Obá y Shangó’, Tablas, 2 (1984), pp. 8–14, here p. 11.
16 See Palmié, Stephan, Wizards & Scientists: Explorations in Afro-Cuban Modernity & Tradition (Durham: Duke University Press, 2002), pp. 200–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
17 Hernández Espinosa, María Antonia, pp. 231–2.
18 Brown, David H., The Light Inside: Abakuá Society Arts and Cuban Cultural History (Washington: Smithsonian Books, 2003), p. 29Google Scholar.
19 Hernández Espinosa, María Antonia, p. 243.
20 Bell, Catherine, Ritual: Perspectives and Dimensions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997), pp. 191–7Google Scholar.
21 Hernández Espinosa, María Antonia, p. 254.
22 Bataille, Georges, Theory of Religion (New York: Zone Books, 1992), pp. 27–42Google Scholar.
23 Hernández Espinosa, María Antonia, p. 201.
24 Ibid., pp. 267–8.
25 Brandon, George, The Dead Sell Memories: Santería from Africa to the New World (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1997), p. 102Google Scholar.
26 Miller, Ivor L., ‘Religious Symbolism in Cuban Political Performance’, Drama Review, 44, 2 (2000), pp. 30–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
27 Butler, Judith, Undoing Gender (New York: Routledge, 2004), p. 19, 33Google Scholar.
28 Rizk, Beatriz J., Posmodernismo y teatro en América Latina: Teorías y prácticas en el umbral del siglo XXI (Frankfurt: Iberoamericana, Vervuert, 2001), p. 288Google Scholar.
29 Lachatañeré, Rómulo, El sistema religioso de los Afrocubanos (La Habana: Editorial de Ciencias Sociales, 2004), pp. 254–61Google Scholar.
30 Inés Terry, María Martiatu, ‘Chivo que rompe tambó: Santería, género y raza en María Antonia’, in Inés Terry, María Martiatu, ed., Una pasión compartida: María Antonia (La Habana: Editorial Letras Cubanas, 2004), pp. 32–74Google Scholar, here pp. 51–2.
31 Lévi-Strauss, Claude, The Savage Mind (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1966), p. 32Google Scholar.
32 Blau, Herbert, The Dubious Spectacle: Extremities of Theater, 1976–2000 (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2002), pp. 154–5Google Scholar.
33 Menéndez, Lázara, Rodar el coco. Proceso de cambio en la santería (La Habana: Editorial de Ciencias Sociales, 2002), pp. 173–231Google Scholar.
34 For the distinction between archive and repertoire, see Taylor, Diana, The Archive and the Repertoire (Durham: Duke University Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
35 Hernández Espinosa, María Antonia, p. 213.