No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Culture and Political Change: British Radical Theatre in Recent History
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 January 2009
Extract
To speak of placing any theatre work within its ‘social and political context’ has become almost a matter of course, but, at the same time, the epistemological problems presented by the proliferation of critical theory based on fragmented views of society (or society as fragments), proposing tentative opinions and ‘open readings’, makes this a difficult task and expresses the insecurity of the age. The pluralistic accommodations demanded by theories based on identity, for example, can add to this insecurity. It may become ‘safer’ and considered virtuous to offer ‘partial readings’, thus suggesting a democratization of thought which I would argue is frequently spurious. What often results is a disjunction between theory and materiality. Life is experienced through materiality, action cannot be indeterminate, though it may imply indeterminacy. When the actors appear in the performance space to create a relationship with their audience, this action is predicated by material decisions. The size of the space, positioning of the audience, spatial relationships beween actors and set, textures and colours, and when to turn the lights on and off are all the subject of prior consideration conditioned by the intentions of the play's producers. What do they want the play to do? Why are they doing it? They seek an audience in order to expose ideas and to create a theatrical experience. These ideas may be confused or contradictory but they exist. Moreover since all creative work is derivative in some sense (in that it is based on pre-existent tradition), theatre makers cannot claim to be innocent observers. It is naive to suggest that theatre may be somehow ‘neutral’ or ‘open’ since all meaning is constructed on the basis of prior knowledge. Thus I am proposing that there is a crucial dialectical relationship between theory and practice.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © International Federation for Theatre Research 1996
References
Notes
1. Sunday Telegraph, 8 05 1994.Google Scholar
2. A whole issue of Marxism Today (10 1988)Google Scholar was devoted to announcing ‘New Times’.
3. This idea was promoted by the TUC (Trade Union Congress) and was taken up particularly by South Wales miners' leaders after the defeat of the strike, 1984–5. Significantly one of its chief proponents was Kim Howells who later went on to become a Labour MP.
4. Norris, Christopher, What's Wrong With Postmodernism. Critical Theory and the Ends of Philosophy (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1990), p. 2.Google Scholar
5. ‘Running Down the Mountain’, Channel 4, 9 06 1990.Google Scholar
6. Ibid.
7. Phelan, Peggy, Unmarked, The Politics of Performance (London: Routledge, 1993), p. 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. A similar case has been put against the ‘post-Marxists’, Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe. Norman Geras presents a Marxist critique of their book Hegemony and Social Strategy (London: Verso, 1985)Google Scholar in his Discourses of Extremity: Radical Ethics and Post-Marxist Extravaganzas (London: Verso, 1990).Google Scholar
9. Norris, , What's Wrong With Postmodernismi, p. 44.Google Scholar
10. The debate took place during the late 70s in various left journals including Wedge and Socialist Review.
11. Craig, Sandy, Dreams and Deconstructions (Ambergate: Amber Lane Press, 1980), p. 36.Google Scholar
12. Barker, Clive ‘Alternative Theatre/Political Theatre’, in The Politics of Theatre and Drama, ed., Holderness, Graham (London: Macmillan, 1992), p. 31.Google Scholar
13. Cited in Craig, , Dreams and Deconstructions, p. 33.Google Scholar
14. Kershaw, Baz, The Politics of Performance. Radical Theatre as Cultural Intervention (London: Routledge, 1992), p. 255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Ibid.
16. McCullough, Christopher, ‘From Brecht to Brechtian’, in The Politics of Theatre and Drama, p. 131.Google Scholar
17. Ibid.
18. Ibid., p. 132.
19. ‘Socials' were evenings — usually spent in Miners’ Welfare Clubs, Community Centres or Town Halls — providing entertainment and often used for fundraising and expressions of solidarity.
20. A brief history of the work by founder member Dave Rogers is contained in a special edition of the journal Theatre Ireland, edited by John Arden and Margaretta D'Arcy (10 1992).Google Scholar
21. Hytch, Jane, West Midlands Arts assessor's report, 12 05 1987.Google Scholar
22. McConachie, Bruce A. and Friedman, Daniel, eds., Theatre for Working-Class Audiences in the United States 1830–1980 (Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 1985), p. 4.Google Scholar
23. Draper, Hal, Marx, Karl's Theory of Revolution, vol. 2: The Politics of Social Classes (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1978), p. 42Google Scholar, cited in Smith, Sharon, ‘Mistaken Identity — or can identity politics liberate the oppressed?’ International Socialism Journal, 62, (Spring 1994).Google Scholar
24. Samuel, Raphael, MacColl, Ewan, and Cosgrove, Stuart, Theatres of the Left 1830–1935. Workers Theatre Movements in Britain and America (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1985), p. 144.Google Scholar