Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Contents:

Information:

  • Access
  • Open access
  • Cited by 1

Actions:

      • Send article to Kindle

        To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

        Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

        Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

        Inconsistencies in Section 136 assessments
        Available formats
        ×

        Send article to Dropbox

        To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

        Inconsistencies in Section 136 assessments
        Available formats
        ×

        Send article to Google Drive

        To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

        Inconsistencies in Section 136 assessments
        Available formats
        ×
Export citation

Liz Tate 1 rightfully mentioned that there are junior trainees attending to the Section 136 assessments, despite clear guidance in the Mental Health Act Code of Practice that it should be done by Section 12(2)-approved doctors. Further to that, the Code states that a reason should be documented for divulging from the aforementioned practice. In most places this practice of assessments by a non-Section 12(2)-approved doctor is a protocol and a norm.

Every directorate and trust has its own local policies, keeping the Code of Practice as standard. For the formulation of a local policy, representatives from multiple agencies such as police, accident and emergency departments, ambulance services, Social Services and mental health services formulate guidelines for the fluidity of the process of Section 136 assessments. Timescales are set for the completion of these assessments and are regularly reviewed.

There are provisions for middle tier or consultant cover to facilitate the Section 136 assessments. Despite these arrangements, there are units where the attendance of non-Section 12(2)-approved doctors is the first port of call for such assessment; after a detailed history has been taken from the patient, the Section 12(2)-approved doctor is contacted and the assessment completed. Furthermore, it is known that there are places where non-Section 12(2)-approved doctors discharge patients after having discussions over the telephone with a Section 12(2)-approved doctor. It has also been found that there are times when patients are admitted to in-patient beds under Section 136 for more than 48 hours, for example because the concerned Section 12(2)-approved doctor is reluctant to come out to complete the Section 136 assessment out of hours. There are few places where the Code of Practice is scrupulously followed and Section 12(2)-approved doctors are the first port of contact.

It makes you wonder that despite being a part of the legal system, Section 136 is very poorly managed as compared with the other sections of the Mental Health Act. There is no unitary form for Section 136 assessment documentation and no accountability for the assessments and detention of persons on Section 136. The time is right to make amends for this varied practice and for measures to be taken to get it right.

1 Tate, L. Inexperienced trainees doing more Section 136 assessments (e-letter). Psychiatrist 2010; 26 July (http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/eletters/34/7/268#10147).