Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T18:24:28.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Multi-physics problems computation using numerically adapted meshes: application to magneto-thermo-mechanical systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2013

Antoine Alexandre Journeaux*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Génie Électrique de Paris (UMR 8507), 11 rue Joliot Curie, Plateau du Moulon, 91192 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Frédéric Bouillault
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Génie Électrique de Paris (UMR 8507), 11 rue Joliot Curie, Plateau du Moulon, 91192 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Jean-Yves Roger
Affiliation:
EDF R&D, 1 avenue du Général De Gaulle, BP 408, 92141 Clamart, France

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In physical systems, interactions between phenomena of different nature, generally coupled to each other, are often involved. Their comprehensive study requires the use of various physical models sharing a unique set of physical quantities. In an effort to correctly model these systems, numerical methods are frequently used. However, computational tools dedicated to such a specific scope of use are barely available. Furthermore, unsuited numerical discretization and high memory costs are two major drawbacks limiting the use of coupled numerical models. We present in this paper a global method which enables the independent use of existing computational tools, the numerical adaption to each physical model and the reduction of the memory use. This method has resorted to a unique discretization and topology for each physical model. The link between these independent models is ensured by the projection of quantities common to them. Thus computational tools, originally not intended to operate together, can be used again. After a theoretical description of the projection method, we will present successive application to discretizations of different nature. Thus, numerical efficiency of the projections in themselves will be tested. Because of the large range of combination of physical models, additional tests will be carried out in order to determine the most accurate coupling flowchart. A highly coupled problem, involving three different physical models, will be presented using the projection method. Results show a significant gain in flexibility and cuts in memory costs. Present test-cases reveal that accuracy is of same order as the one obtained using dedicated tools.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2013

References

Ren, Z., Ionescu, B., Besbes, M., Razek, A., IEEE Trans. Magn. 31, 1873 (1995)CrossRef
Besbes, M., Ren, Z., Razek, A., IEEE Trans. Magn. 32, 1058 (1996)CrossRef
Bossavit, A., Mayergoyz, I.D., Computational Electromagnetism: Variational Formulations, Complementarity, Edge Elements (Elsevier Science, Boston, 1998)Google Scholar
Ren, Z., IEEE Trans. Magn. 30, 3471 (1994)CrossRef
Ren, Z., Razek, A., IEEE Trans. Magn. 28, 1212 (1992)CrossRef
Bossavit, A., Int. J. Appl. Electromagn. Mater. 2, 333 (1992)
Bossavit, A., Eur. J. Mech. B Fluids 10, 474 (1991)
Bossavit, A., Int. Compumag Soc. Newsletter 11, 12 (2004)
Bossavit, A., Compel 26, 932 (2007)CrossRef
Bossavit, A., IEEE Trans. Magn. 44, 1158 (2008)CrossRef
Kovanen, T., Tarhasaari, T., Kettunen, L., IEEE Trans. Magn. 47, 894 (2011)CrossRef
Parent, G., Dular, P., Piriou, F., Abakar, A., IEEE Trans. Magn. 45, 1132 (2009)CrossRef
Ciarlet, P.G., in Studies in Mathematics and its Applications (Elsevier Science, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978)Google Scholar
Alauzet, F., Mehrenberger, M., P1-conservative solution interpolation on unstructured triangular meshes. Rapport de recherche RR-6804, INRIA, Rocquencourt, France, 2009Google Scholar
Devillers, O., Guigue, P., Technical Report RR-4488, INRIA, 2002Google Scholar
Nemitz, N., Moreau, O., Ould-Rouis, Y., Magneto-thermal coupling: A conservative-based method for scalar field projection, in 18th Conference on the Computation of Electromagnetic Fields (Compumag 11), Sydney, Australia, 2011Google Scholar
Wang, Z., Journeaux, A.A., Henneron, T., Bouillault, F., Nemitz, N., Roger, J.-Y., Mipo, J.C., Piriou, F., Modelling of magneto-elastic problems on disconnected meshes, in Seventh European Conference on Numerical Methods in Electromagnetism, Marseille, France, 2012Google Scholar
Flemisch, B., Wohlmuth, B.I., Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Equ. 20, 374 (2004)CrossRef
Wohlmuth, B.I., SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 38, 989 (1998)CrossRef
Wohlmuth, B.I., Modél. Math. Anal. Numér. 36, 995 (2002)CrossRef
Buffa, A., Rapetti, F., Math. Mod. Methods Appl. Sci. 35, 191 (1999)
Belgacem, F.B., Numer. Math. 84, 173 (1999)CrossRef
Morisue, T., IEEE Trans. Magn. 26, 540 (1990)CrossRef
Ren, Z., Razek, A., IEEE Trans. Magn. 26, 1650 (1990)CrossRef
Moon, F.C., Magneto-solid mechanics (Wiley-Interscience Publication, Wiley, New York, 1984)Google ScholarPubMed
Journeaux, A.A., Bouillault, F., Roger, J.-Y., Magneto-mechanical dynamic system modelling using computer code chaining and field projections, in IEEE Conference on Electromagnetic Field Computation, Oita, Japan, 2012Google Scholar
Yuan, K., Appl. Sci. Res. 26, 307 (1972)CrossRef