Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Comparison of the ozone generation efficiency by two different discharge modes of dielectric barrier discharge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2011


N. Osawa
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Kanazawa Institute of Technology, 7-1 Ohgigaoka, Nonoichi, Ishikawa, 9218501, Japan
H. Kaga
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Kanazawa Institute of Technology, 7-1 Ohgigaoka, Nonoichi, Ishikawa, 9218501, Japan
Y. Fukuda
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Kanazawa Institute of Technology, 7-1 Ohgigaoka, Nonoichi, Ishikawa, 9218501, Japan
S. Harada
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Kanazawa Institute of Technology, 7-1 Ohgigaoka, Nonoichi, Ishikawa, 9218501, Japan
Y. Yoshioka
Affiliation:
Office of Industry-University Collaboration, Kanazawa Institute of Technology, 7-1 Ohgigaoka, Nonoichi, Ishikawa, 9218501, Japan
R. Hanaoka
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Kanazawa Institute of Technology, 7-1 Ohgigaoka, Nonoichi, Ishikawa, 9218501, Japan
Corresponding

Get access

Abstract

The Dielectric Barrier Discharge (DBD) is composed of many Filamentary Discharges (FDs), and it can be applied to ozone generation, gaseous pollution control, etc. In our laboratory, we investigated efficient cleaning methods of diesel exhaust gas by DBD. From the results of numerical simulation of chemical reactions, a homogeneous DBD was expected to improve the efficiency of pollution control and also the ozone yield. Recently, we found that a DBD device using alumina as barrier material can generate an Atmospheric Pressure Townsend Discharge (APTD) in air. In this research, we setup two ozonizers with different discharge modes of FD and APTD, and compared the ozone yield. The experimental results showed that the ozone yield was higher by the FD mode than by the APTD mode in lower Specific Input Energy (SIE) region. However in the region that the SIE is larger than 420J/L, the APTD mode showed higher ozone yield than FD mode.


Type
Research Article
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Eliasson, B., Kogelschatz, U., IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 19, 1063 (1991) CrossRef
Yoshioka, Y., Int. J. Plasma Environ. Sci. Technol. 1, 110 (2007)
L. Aubrecht, J. Pìchal, H. Koshelyev, in Proc. Int. Conf. on Gas Discharge and Their Applications (Toulouse, France, 2004), Vol. 1, pp. 231–234
N. Wada, Y. Tanimura, M. Tanaka, M. Kuzumoto, in Proc. 10th Int. Symp. on High Pressure and Low Temperature Plasma Chemistry, Saga, Japan, 2006, pp. 156–159
Takaki, K., Shimizu, M., Mukaigawa, S., Fujiwara, T., IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 32, 32 (2004) CrossRef
Y. Yoshioka, T. Shoyama, in Proc. 9th Int. Symp. on High Pressure and Low Temperature Plasma Chemistry (Padova, Italy, 2004)
Y. Yoshioka, T. Shoyama, in Proc. 10th Int. Symp. on High Pressure and Low Temperature Plasma Chemistry, Saga, Japan, 2006, pp. 217–220
N. Osawa, Y. Yoshioka, Y. Mochizuki, Y. Kobayashi, Y. Yamada, R. Hanaoka, S. Takata, in Proc. 19th Int. Symp. on Plasma Chemistry, Bochum, Germany, 2009, p. P1.3.02
N. Gherardi, N. Naudé, Et. Es-sebbar, T. Enache, H. Caquineau, F. Massines, in Proc. 10th Int. Symp. on High Pressure and Low Temperature Plasma Chemistry, Saga, Japan, 2006, pp. 21–24
Osawa, N., Yoshioka, Y., Hanaoka, R., Mochizuki, Y., Kobayashi, Y., Yamada, Y., IEEJ Trans. Fundam. Mater. 130, 306 (2010) CrossRef
N. Osawa, Y. Yoshioka, R. Hanaoka, in Proc. 6th Asia-Pacific Int. Symp. on the Basic and Application of Plasma Technology (Hsinchu, Taiwan, R.O.C., 2009), pp. 217–220
Keto, J.W., J. Chem. Phys. 74, 4445 (1981) CrossRef
Walker, I.C., Gingell, J.M., Mason, N.J., Marston, G., J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 29, 4749 (1996) CrossRef
U. Kogelschatz, B. Eliasson, in Handbook of Electrostatic Process, edited by J.-S. Chang, A.J. Kelly, J.M. Crowly (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1995), pp. 588–593

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 18 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 5th December 2020. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-b4dcdd7-bf5bq Total loading time: 0.26 Render date: 2020-12-05T06:48:37.352Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags last update: Sat Dec 05 2020 06:01:04 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) Feature Flags: { "metrics": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "peerReview": true, "crossMark": true, "comments": true, "relatedCommentaries": true, "subject": true, "clr": false, "languageSwitch": true }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Comparison of the ozone generation efficiency by two different discharge modes of dielectric barrier discharge
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Comparison of the ozone generation efficiency by two different discharge modes of dielectric barrier discharge
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Comparison of the ozone generation efficiency by two different discharge modes of dielectric barrier discharge
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *