Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Information:

  • Access
  • Cited by 15
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Tkach, Dennis Reimer, Jake and Hatsopoulos, Nicholas G 2008. Observation-based learning for brain–machine interfaces. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, Vol. 18, Issue. 6, p. 589.

    Pridmore, Saxby Brüne, Martin Ahmadi, Jamshid and Dale, Jack 2008. Echopraxia in Schizophrenia: Possible Mechanisms. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 42, Issue. 7, p. 565.

    Haker, Helene and Rössler, Wulf 2009. Empathy in schizophrenia: impaired resonance. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, Vol. 259, Issue. 6, p. 352.

    Hari, Riitta and Kujala, Miiamaaria V. 2009. Brain Basis of Human Social Interaction: From Concepts to Brain Imaging. Physiological Reviews, Vol. 89, Issue. 2, p. 453.

    Kato, Yutaka Muramatsu, Taro Kato, Motoichiro Shibukawa, Yoshiyuki Shintani, Masuro Mimura, Masaru and Hashimoto, Kenji 2011. Magnetoencephalography Study of Right Parietal Lobe Dysfunction of the Evoked Mirror Neuron System in Antipsychotic-Free Schizophrenia. PLoS ONE, Vol. 6, Issue. 11, p. e28087.

    McCormick, Laurie M. Brumm, Michael C. Beadle, Janelle N. Paradiso, Sergio Yamada, Thoru and Andreasen, Nancy 2012. Mirror neuron function, psychosis, and empathy in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, Vol. 201, Issue. 3, p. 233.

    Bender, Stephan Schröder, Johannes Freitag, Christine Roessner, Veit Resch, Franz and Weisbrod, Matthias 2012. Movement-related potentials point towards an impaired tuning of reafferent sensory feedback by preceding motor activation in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, Vol. 202, Issue. 1, p. 65.

    Mehta, Urvakhsh Meherwan Thirthalli, Jagadisha Basavaraju, Rakshathi Gangadhar, Bangalore N. and Pascual-Leone, Alvaro 2014. Reduced Mirror Neuron Activity in Schizophrenia and Its Association With Theory of Mind Deficits: Evidence From a Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study. Schizophrenia Bulletin, Vol. 40, Issue. 5, p. 1083.

    Mehta, Urvakhsh Meherwan Thirthalli, Jagadisha Aneelraj, Dhandapani Jadhav, Prabhu Gangadhar, Bangalore N. and Keshavan, Matcheri S. 2014. Mirror neuron dysfunction in schizophrenia and its functional implications: A systematic review. Schizophrenia Research, Vol. 160, Issue. 1-3, p. 9.

    Horan, William P. Pineda, Jaime A. Wynn, Jonathan K. Iacoboni, Marco and Green, Michael F. 2014. Some markers of mirroring appear intact in schizophrenia: evidence from mu suppression. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, Vol. 14, Issue. 3, p. 1049.

    Mehta, Urvakhsh Meherwan Waghmare, Avinash V. Thirthalli, Jagadisha Venkatasubramanian, Ganesan and Gangadhar, Bangalore N. 2015. Is the human mirror neuron system plastic? Evidence from a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 17, Issue. , p. 71.

    Green, Michael F. Horan, William P. and Lee, Junghee 2015. Social cognition in schizophrenia. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, Vol. 16, Issue. 10, p. 620.

    Andrews, Sophie C. Enticott, Peter G. Hoy, Kate E. Thomson, Richard H. and Fitzgerald, Paul B. 2015. No evidence for mirror system dysfunction in schizophrenia from a multimodal TMS/EEG study. Psychiatry Research, Vol. 228, Issue. 3, p. 431.

    Kaufmann, Tobias Skåtun, Kristina C. Alnæs, Dag Doan, Nhat Trung Duff, Eugene P. Tønnesen, Siren Roussos, Evangelos Ueland, Torill Aminoff, Sofie R. Lagerberg, Trine V. Agartz, Ingrid Melle, Ingrid S. Smith, Stephen M. Andreassen, Ole A. and Westlye, Lars T. 2015. Disintegration of Sensorimotor Brain Networks in Schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, Vol. 41, Issue. 6, p. 1326.

    Zaytseva, Yuliya Morozova, Alexandra Bendova, Marie and Garakh, Zhanna 2017. Is motor imagery different in catatonic schizophrenia?. PsyCh Journal, Vol. 6, Issue. 2, p. 137.

    ×

Actions:

      • Send article to Kindle

        To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

        Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

        Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

        Manifest disease and motor cortex reactivity in twins discordant for schizophrenia
        Available formats
        ×

        Send article to Dropbox

        To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

        Manifest disease and motor cortex reactivity in twins discordant for schizophrenia
        Available formats
        ×

        Send article to Google Drive

        To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

        Manifest disease and motor cortex reactivity in twins discordant for schizophrenia
        Available formats
        ×
Export citation

Summary

Schizophrenia is often associated with difficulties in distinguishing between actions of self and of others. This could reflect dysfunction of the mirror neuron system which directly matches observed and executed actions. We studied 11 people with schizophrenia and their co-twins without manifest disease, using stimulus-induced changes in the magnetoencephalographic $20 Hz rhythm as an index of activation in the motor cortex part of the mirror neuron system. During action observation and execution, motor cortex reaction was weaker in those with schizophrenia than in their co-twins, suggesting a disease-related dysfunction of motor cognition.

Footnotes

Declaration of interest

None. Funding detailed in Acknowledgements.

During psychotic episodes people with schizophrenia often have difficulties with awareness of their own actions and recognition of other individuals’ actions, evident from beliefs of alien control (Daprati et al, 1997). Such difficulties, like echopraxia (see e.g. Chapman & McGhie, 1964) and activity delusions (patients feel that they influence others to act; Stanghellini & Rossi Monti, 1993), could be related to dysfunction of the mirror neuron system, which matches executed and observed motor actions (Rizzolatti et al, 1996). The core system comprises the inferior frontal gyrus (Broca's region in the left hemisphere), the inferior parietal lobule and the primary motor cortex.

Here we tested whether people with schizophrenia would show abnormalities in the motor cortex part of their mirror neuron system during observation and execution of finger movements. Earlier studies have indicated abnormal motor cortex function in patients with schizophrenia compared with healthy participants (reviewed by Spence, 2003). We applied a well-established method to monitor motor cortex ∼20 Hz magnetoencephalographic (MEG) activity (Hari et al, 1998). In response to electrical median nerve stimuli, this ∼20 Hz rhythm is first transiently and bilaterally suppressed, and then 200–400 ms later is strongly enhanced (Fig. 1a), probably reflecting cortical inhibition (Salmelin & Hari, 1994; Chen et al, 1999). Consequently, the size of the ‘rebound’ reflects the functional state of the primary motor cortex; for example the rebound is abolished when the person manipulates an object (Hari et al, 1998).

Fig. 1 (a) The level of the ∼20 Hz rhythm recorded from the left motor cortex (see inset) in a representative participant after right median nerve stimulation (0 ms). In the ‘rest’ condition the ∼20 Hz rhythm is blocked for about 400 ms after which it shows a ‘rebound’ enhancement as a signature of motor cortex stabilisation. In the ‘action’ condition (Act) the motor cortex is active during the participant's own finger movements and no rebound is observed. In the ‘observation’ condition (Obs) the rebound is of lower amplitude than during rest, indicating partial activation of the motor cortex during action observation. (b) (c) The ∼20 Hz reactivity in all participants, quantified as the difference between rest and observation and displayed as a function of the difference between rest and action. In accordance with earlier studies on healthy individuals, nearly all data points are to the right of the diagonal (dashed line), meaning that the suppression of the ∼20 Hz rebound is less marked in the observation than the action condition. In most cases (see text for statistics), values for the twin with manifest disease (•) are lower (on both axes) than for the non-affected twin (○, data for twin pairs connected with lines), indicating lower motor cortex reactivity during both action observation and action execution.

We compared motor cortex reactivity within schizophrenia-discordant twin pairs, thereby controlling for a portion of the genetic influences on brain physiology. Some of the non-affected co-twins resembled their twin in possessing features of schizotypal personality, which further increased the suitability of this comparison for pinpointing brain abnormalities related to manifest schizophrenia.

METHOD

Participants were derived from a randomly selected subset of 335 schizophrenia-discordant twin pairs, identified (for another study) in a cohort of all 9562 pairs of same-sex twins born in Finland between 1940 and 1957 (Cannon et al, 2000). The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM–III–R Axis I Disorders (patient or non-patient edition; Spitzer et al, 1989) served for verification of the diagnoses in all participants. Interviewers were masked to zygosity and diagnostic status. A diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder, affective type in a twin with manifest disease or a psychotic disorder diagnosis in a non-affected twin led to exclusion of that twin pair (Cannon et al, 2000). Eleven twin pairs (aged 49–64 years, mean age 54.4 years, s.d.=4.8, five monozygotic and six dizygotic) participated in the study after informed consent and ethics committee approval. All the participants with manifest disease were out-patients in stable clinical condition (further details in a data supplement to the online version of this report). For all pairs, zygosity was determined by DNA analysis (for details see Cannon et al, 2000).

Neuromagnetic data were acquired during three experimental conditions: (a) rest – the participants rested in a relaxed state; (b) observation – the participants observed the experimenter manipulate a small object with her right-hand fingers; (c) action – the participants manipulated the small object with their right-hand fingers without seeing their own hand.

The left and right median nerves were stimulated alternately at the wrists (0.2 ms constant current pulses at intensities exceeding the motor threshold), once every 1.5 s. Signals from 204 planar gradiometers of a helmet-shaped whole-scalp neuromagnetometer (Vectorview, Neuromag, Helsinki, Finland) were analysed. Stimulus-related changes in the level of the ∼20 Hz rhythm were quantified by first filtering signals through 14–30 Hz, then rectifying them and finally averaging them time-locked to the median nerve stimuli (approximately 100 signals averaged per condition). The strength of the rebound in each condition was then quantified (from the MEG channel with the strongest rebound suppression during action observation) as the mean level from 300 ms to 1300 ms after stimuli (Salmelin & Hari, 1994).

RESULTS

Figure 1a shows the ∼20 Hz motor cortex level for one participant. The rebound, peaking at 700 ms, was abolished during object manipulation and significantly suppressed during observation, as shown previously (Schnitzler et al, 1997; Hari et al, 1998). Figure 1b and 1c illustrate the ∼20 Hz reactivity in all twin pairs. For both hemispheres and for both observation and action conditions, the twins with schizophrenia showed weaker reactivity of the ∼20 Hz rhythm than their non-affected co-twins (binomial test for n=11 pairs: rest–action P=0.033 and rest–observation NS in left hemisphere; rest–action P=0.006 and rest–observation P=0.006 in right hemisphere).

The rest levels of the ∼20 Hz rhythm did not differ between affected and non-affected co-twins, nor was there any statistically significant difference between the groups in the strengths of cortical responses peaking in the primary somatosensory cortex 20 ms and 35 ms after median nerve stimuli (t-test, P≥0.2). The ∼20 Hz reactivity and the dosages of antipsychotic medication were not correlated (Pearson's r=0.43, P=0.19) (further details in a data supplement to the online version of this report).

DISCUSSION

The ∼20 Hz motor cortex rhythm in the twins with schizophrenia was systematically less reactive than in their non-affected co-twins, both during action observation and execution, with no sign of an additional mirror neuron system abnormality. Since the observed effects were not correlated with medication, we attribute them to the disease itself. The similar somatosensory cortical responses and the comparable resting levels of the rhythmic activity in non-affected and affected participants render implausible any general dysfunctioning of cortical responsiveness in the patient group. The weakened ∼20 Hz reactivity, specific to clinically manifest disease in the affected twins, could be related to a deficit in motor cognition affecting both the command and the experience of action, both important for delusions of control (Frith, 2005). Further studies should test more extensively the functionality of motor and sensory mirroring in people with schizophrenia, focusing on subgroups displaying special abnormalities in the experience of action.

Declaration of interest None. Funding detailed in Acknowledgements.

Acknowledgements

Supported by the Academy of Finland (National Centers of Excellence Programme 2006–2011), Sigrid Jusélius Foundation, and the National Institute of Mental Health, USA (MH52857). We thank Ulla Mustonen for help in recruiting the participants.

References

Cannon, T. D., Huttunen, M. O., Lönnqvist, J., et al (2000) The inheritance of neuropsychological dysfunction in twins discordant for schizophrenia. American Journal of Human Genetics, 67, 369382.
Chapman, J. & McGhie, A. (1964) Echopraxia in schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 110, 365374.
Chen, R., Corwell, B. & Hallett, M. (1999) Modulation of motor cortex excitability by median nerve and digit stimulation. Experimental Brain Research, 129, 7786.
Daprati, E., Franck, N., Georgieff, N., et al (1997) Looking for the agent: an investigation into consciousness of action and self-consciousness in schizophrenic patients. Cognition, 65, 7186.
Frith, C. (2005) The self in action: lessons from delusions of control. Consciousness and Cognition, 14, 752770.
Hari, R., Forss, N., Avikainen, S., et al (1998) Activation of human primary motor cortex during action observation: a neuromagnetic study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 95, 1506115065.
Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Matelli, M., et al (1996) Localization of grasp representations in humans by PET: 1. Observation versus execution. Experimental Brain Research, 111, 246252.
Salmelin, R. & Hari, R. (1994) Characterization of spontaneous MEG rhythms in healthy adults. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 91, 237248.
Spence, S. A. (2003) Cognitive neurobiology of volition and agency in schizophrenia. In Disorders of Brain and Mind 2 (ed. Robbins, T. W.), pp. 223242. Cambridge University Press.
Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., Gibbon, M., et al (1989) Instruction Manual for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R SCID. Biometrics Research.
Stanghellini, G. & Rossi Monti, M. (1993) Influencing and being influenced: the other side of ‘bizarre delusions'. 2. Clinical investigation. Psychopathology, 26, 165169.