Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T23:33:57.351Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Classification in psychiatry: ICD–10 v. DSM–IV

A response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2018

Michael B. First  and
Harold Alan Pincus
Michael B. First*
Affiliation:
Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York State Psychiatric Institute
Harold Alan Pincus
Affiliation:
American Psychiatric Association Office of Research, American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC, USA
*
Dr Michael B. First, Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute. 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 60. New York. NY 10032. USA. Tel: 212-543-5531; Fax: 212-543-5525; e-mail: mbf2@columbia.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The editorial by Andrews et al (1999) usefully calls attention to issues of compatibility between diagnostic classification systems but we believe that the editorial greatly overstates the compatibility problem as well as its implications. The article begins with the suggestion that the DSM–IV authors' position is to downplay the differences between DSM–IV and ICD–10. After stating that the American Psychiatric Association “felt sufficiently confident to publish a DSM–IV International Version in which the DSM–IV criteria are listed against the ICD–10 codes”, the authors go on to report concordances between the classifications for the main mental disorders as ranging from a low of 33% (for substance harmful use or abuse) to 87% (for dysthymia), with an overall concordance of only 68%. The authors conclude that if this “unnecessary dissonance between the classification systems continues, patients, researchers and clinicians will be all the poorer”. Although we acknowledge that there are a number of differences between the two systems, the authors fail to assess fully the sources, significance and solutions for this compatibility problem.

Type
Editorials
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 175 , Issue 3 , September 1999 , pp. 205 - 209
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

References

Andrews, G., Slade, T., Peters, L., et al (1998) Generalized anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder and social phobia: sources of dissonance between ICD–10 and DSM–IV. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 7, 110–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, G., Slade, T. & Peters, L. (1999) Classification in psychiatry: ICD–10 versus DSM–IV. British Journal of Psychiatry, 174, 3–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blake, D. D., Weathers, F. W., Nagy, L. N., et al (1990) A clinician rating scale for assessing current and lifetime PTSD: the CAPS–I. Behavior Therapist, 18, 187–188.Google Scholar
Keane, T. M., Caddell, J. M. & Taylor, K. L. (1988) Mississippi Scale for Combat-Related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: three studies in reliability and validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 56, 85–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendell, R. E. (1991) Relationship between the DSM–IV and the ICD–10. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 297–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kilpatrick, D. G., Resnick, H. S., Freedy, J. R., et al (1998) Posttraumatic stress disorder field trial: evaluation of the PTSD construct-criteria A through E. In DSM–IV Sourcebook. Volume 4 (eds Widiger, T. A., Frances, A. J., Pincus, H. A., Ross, R., First, M. B., Davis, W., & Kline, M.), pp. 803–844. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Maser, J. D., Kaelber, C. & Weise, R. E. (1991) International use and attitudes toward DSM – III and DSM – III – R: growing consensus in psychiatric classification. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 271–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pincus, H. A., Zarin, D. A. & First, M. B. (1998) ‘Clinical significance’ and the DSM – IV [Letter]. Archives of General Psychiatry, 55, 1145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Regier, D. A., Kaelber, C. T., Rae, D. S., et al (1998) Limitations of diagnostic criteria and assessment instruments for mental disorders: implications for research and policy. Archives of General Psychiatry, 55, 109–115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sartorius, N., Kaelber, C. T., Cooper, J. E., et al (1993) Progress toward achieving a common language in psychiatry: results from the field trial of the clinical guidelines accompanying the WHO classification of mental and behavioral disorders in ICD – 10. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50, 115–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sartorius, N., Ustun, T. B., Korten, A., et al (1995) Progress toward achieving a common language in psychiatry, II: results from the international field trials of the ICD – 10 diagnostic criteria for research for mental and behavioral disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 152, 1427–1437.Google ScholarPubMed
Widiger, T. A., Frances, A. J., Pincus, H. A., et al (1990) DSM–IV literature reviews: rationale, process, and limitations. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 2, 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widiger, T. A., Frances, A. J., Pincus, H. A., et al (1991) Toward an empirical classification for the DSM–IV. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 280–288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Widiger, T. A., Frances, A. J., Pincus, H. A., et al (1994) DSM–IV Sourcebook, Volume I. Washington. DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Widiger, T. A., Frances, A. J., Pincus, H. A., et al (1996) DSM–IV Sourcebook, Volume 2. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Widiger, T. A., Frances, A. J., Pincus, H. A., et al (1997) DSM – IV Sourcebook, Volume 3. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Widiger, T. A., Frances, A. J., Pincus, H. A., et al (1998) DSM–IV Sourcebook, Volume 4. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Williams, J. B. W. & Spitzer, R. L. (1980) DSM–III field trials: interrater reliability and list of project staff and participants. In Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd edn) (DSM–III), pp. 467–481. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1992a) International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (10th Revision) (Volume I). Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1992b) ICD–10 Classification of Mental and Behavioral Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1993) ICD–10 Classification of Mental and Behavioral Disorders: Diagnostic Criteria for Research. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1994) Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (Version 2.0 Manual). Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1997) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (Version 2,12-month). Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.