Skip to main content Accessibility help

Activity and views of service users involved in mental health research: UK survey

  • Sue Patterson (a1), Jenny Trite (a2) and Tim Weaver (a3)



Optimisation of the process and outcomes of service user involvement in research is dependent on understanding current practice, challenges and opportunities.


To describe activities, roles and experiences of service users involved in mental health research.


National cross-sectional online questionnaire survey, using snowball sampling. Descriptive statistics and framework analysis undertaken collaboratively with a service user reference group.


The survey revealed a previously undescribed, highly qualified service user research workforce. Positioned within and alongside mainstream research, respondents reported drawing on extensive service use, and passion for service improvement to challenge perceived clinical academic dominance of research. The support of peers was crucial to involvement, which typically enhanced mental health but for some, pervasive stigma and scrutiny undermined self-confidence and practical difficulties challenged equitable participation.


Recognition of the service user research workforce will support the constructive amalgamation of academic and experiential expertise needed to shape and realise investment in mental health research.


Corresponding author

Tim Weaver, Centre for Mental Health, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, Claybrook Centre, 37 Claybrook Road, London W6 8LN, UK. Email:


Hide All

Declaration of interest




Hide All
1 Department of Health. Patient and Public Involvement in the NHS. Department of Health, 1999.
2 Department of Health. Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care (2nd edn). Department of Health, 2005.
3 National Institute of Health Research. Involving Users in the Research Process: A ‘How To’ Guide for Researchers (Version 1). NIHR Guy's and St. Thomas’ and King's College London's Biomedical Research Centre, 2010.
4 National Institute of Health Research. INVOLVE Strategy 2012–2015: Putting People First in Research. INVOLVE, 2012.
5 National Institute of Health Research. Good Practice Guidance for Involving People with Experience of Mental Health Problems in Research. Mental Health Research Network, 2013.
6 Staley, K. Exploring Impact: Public Involvement in NHS, Public Health and Social Care Research. INVOLVE, 2009.
7 Staley, K, Minogue, V. User involvement leads to more ethically sound research. Clin Ethics 2006; 1: 95100.
8 Wallcraft, J, Schrank, B, Amering, M. Handbook of Service User Involvement in Mental Health Research. John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
9 Trivedi, P, Wykes, T. From passive subjects to equal partners. Qualitative review of user involvement in research. Br J Psychiatry 2002; 181: 468–72.
10 Beresford, P. User involvement in research: exploring the challenges. J Res Nurs 2003; 8: 3646.
11 Oliver, SR, Rees, RW, Clarke-Jones, L, Milne, R, Oakley, AR, Gabbay, J, et al. Multidimensional conceptual framework for analysing public involvement in health services research. Health Expect 2008; 11: 7284.
12 Staley, K. An Evaluation of Service User Involvement in Studies Adopted by the Mental Health Research Network. MHRN, 2010.
13 Brett, J, Staniszewska, S, Mockford, C, Seers, K, Herron-Marx, S, Bayliss, H. The PIRICOM Study: A Systematic Review of the Conceptualisation, Measurement, Impact and Outcomes of Patients and Public Involvement in Health and Social Care Research. Royal College of Nursing, UK Clinical Research Collaboration, University of Warwick, 2010.
14 Telford, R, Faulkner, A. Learning about service user involvement in mental health research. J Ment Health 2004; 13: 549–59.
15 Ritchie, J, Lewis, J. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. Sage Publications, 2003.
16 Glazer, B, Strauss, A. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Aldine, 1967.
17 Charmaz, K. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Sage, 2006.
18 Patterson, S, Hart, J, Weaver, T. Delusions and qualitative confusions: a dialogic collaborative exploration. Qual Health Research 2010; 20: 1008–18.
19 Patterson, S, Weaver, T, Agath, K, Rutter, D, Albert, E, Crawford, MJ. User involvement in efforts to improve the quality of drug misuse services in England: a national survey. Drugs Educ Prev Policy 2009; 16: 364–77.
20 Crawford, MJ, Rutter, D, Manley, C, Weaver, T, Bhui, K, Fulop, N, et al. Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. BMJ 2002; 325: 1263.
21 Beresford, P, Wallcraft, J. Psychiatric system survivors and emancipatory research: issues, overlaps and differences. In Doing Disability Research (eds Barnes, C, Mercer, G). Disability Press, 1997.
22 Thornicroft, G, Bindman, J, Goldberg, D, Gournay, K, Huxley, P. Creating the infrastructure for mental health research. Psychiatr Bull 2002; 26: 403–6.
23 Stewart, R, Liabo, K. Involvement in research without compromising research quality. J Health Serv Res Policy 2012; 17: 248–51.
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Patterson et al. supplementary material
Supplementary Table S1

 PDF (35 KB)
35 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed

Activity and views of service users involved in mental health research: UK survey

  • Sue Patterson (a1), Jenny Trite (a2) and Tim Weaver (a3)
Submit a response


No eLetters have been published for this article.


Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *