Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T03:14:09.800Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

TOUCH AS A MODEL FOR EXPANDED MUSICAL FORM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2018

William Davy Cole
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Touch is world-directed, temporally extended, exploratory contact and movement. It was by modelling his theory of perception on touch that Alva Noë was able to show (in Action in Perception, 2006) that perceptual experience acquires content through our physical interactions with the world, that the detail we perceive in the world ‘is experienced by us as out there, not as in our minds’ (p. 33). In this essay, I share some thoughts on how understanding musical experience on these terms, as touch-like, may be a useful means of looking past the work-concept to the wider field of musical possibilities beyond. I begin by briefly considering the phenomenology of touch, which serves as the basis for the argument that follows.

Type
RESEARCH ARTICLES
Information
Tempo , Volume 73 , Issue 287 , January 2019 , pp. 62 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Noë, Alva, Action in Perception (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006), p. 33Google Scholar.

2 Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, Phenomenology of Perception, trans. Landes, Donald A. (London: Routledge, 2012), p. 330Google Scholar.

3 Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, ‘The Philosopher and His Shadow’, trans. McCleary, R., in Phenomenology: Critical Concepts in Philosophy, vol. 5, ed. Embree, Lester E. and Moran, Dermot (London: Routledge, 1964/2004), p. 183Google Scholar.

4 Schelling, F.W.J., The Philosophy of Art, trans. Stott, Douglas W. (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989), p. 31Google Scholar.

5 Hegel, Georg Friedrich Wilhelm, Hegel's Aesthetics, trans. Knox, T.M., vol. 2 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975), p. 891Google Scholar.

6 ‘Music is as direct an objectification and copy of the whole will as is the world itself’: Schopenhauer, Arthur, The World as Will and Idea, trans. Berman, Judith (London: Everyman, 1995), p. 164Google Scholar.

7 Schopenhauer, The World as Will and Idea, p. 169.

8 Roger Scruton, German Idealism and the Philosophy of Music, (accessed 21 September 2017).

9 Goehr, Lydia, The Imaginary Museum of Musical Works: An Essay in the Philosophy of Music. second edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), p. 155Google Scholar.

10 Robert Schumann, quoted in Goehr, The Imaginary Museum of Musical Works, p. 267.

11 Hanslick, Eduard, On the Musically Beautiful: A Contribution towards the Revision of the Aesthetics of Music, trans. Payzant, Geoffrey (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1986), p. 48Google Scholar.

12 Alperson, Philip, ‘The Philosophy of Music: Formalism and Beyond’, in The Blackwell Guide to Aesthetics, ed. Kivy, Peter (Oxford: Blackwell, 2004), pp. 261–2Google Scholar.

13 Alperson, ‘The Philosophy of Music’, p. 29.

14 Krueger, Joel, ‘Enacting Musical Experience’, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 16/2–3 (2009), p. 105Google Scholar.

15 Lydia Goehr, The Imaginary Museum of Musical Works, p. 148–75.

16 Goehr, The Imaginary Museum of Musical Works, p. 174

17 Quoted in Goehr, The Imaginary Museum of Musical Works, p. 169.

18 Joel Krueger, ‘Enacting Musical Experience’, pp. 114–15.

19 Glover, Richard and Harrison, Bryn, Overcoming Form: Reflections on Immersive Listening (Huddersfield: University of Huddersfield Press, 2013), p. 11Google Scholar.

20 Glover and Harrison, Overcoming Form, p. 9.

21 Joel Krueger, ‘Enacting Musical Experience’, p. 100.

22 Krueger, ‘Enacting Musical Experience’, p. 114.

23 ‘The consistent function of objective thought is to reduce all of phenomena that attest to the union of the subject and the world, and to substitute for them the clear idea of the object as an in-itself and of the subject as pure consciousness. Thus, objective thought cuts the ties that unite the thing and the embodied subject’: Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology of Perception, p. 334.

24 Mondrian, Piet, ‘Pure Art and Pure Plastic Art’, in Modern Artists on Art: Ten Unabridged Essays, ed. Read, Herbert (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1937/1964), p. 121Google Scholar.

25 Morris, Robert, Continuous Project Altered Daily: The Writings of Robert Morris (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993), pp. 15–17Google Scholar.

26 Krauss, Rosalind, The Originality of the Avant-Garde and Other Modernist Myths (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1986), p. 186Google Scholar.

27 Where an ‘epistemic subject is the observer of a projection that occurs within a field conceived as being exterior to “himself”’, where ‘the unified space of order he surveys is never thought of as something that could be affected by his own sensory apparatus, never seen as dependent on his bodily subjectivity’: Krauss, Rosalind, The Optical Unconscious (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994), p. 128CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 Noë, Action in Perception, 1; emphasis in original.

29 Krauss, The Optical Unconscious, p. 133.

30 Krauss, The Originality of the Avant-Garde, p. 270.

31 Goehr, The Imaginary Museum of Musical Works, p. 273.

32 Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, The Visible and the Invisible, trans. Lingis, Alphonso (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1968), p. 133Google Scholar.

33 Ciciliani, Marko, ‘Music in the Expanded Field: On Recent Approaches to Interdisciplinary Composition’, in Darmstädter Beiträge zur Neue Musik, ed. Rebhahn, Michael and Schäfer, Thomas (Mainz: Schott, 2017), pp. 23–35Google Scholar.

34 Ciciliani, ‘Music in the Expanded Field’, p. 24.

35 Ciciliani, ‘Music in the Expanded Field’, p. 23.

36 Ciciliani, ‘Music in the Expanded Field’, p. 31.

37 Krauss, Rosalind, ‘The Story of the Eye’, New Literary History, 21/2 (1990), p. 284CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

38 Krauss, ‘The Story of the Eye’, p. 291.

39 Glover and Harrison, Overcoming Form, p. 16.

40 Clarke, Eric F., Ways of Listening: An Ecological Approach to the Perception of Musical Meaning Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), p. 20CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

41 Ratcliffe, Matthew, ‘Touch and Situatedness’. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16/3 (2008), p. 300CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

42 Ratcliffe, ‘Touch and Situatedness’.

43 Voegelin, Salomé, Listening to Noise and Silence: Towards a Philosophy of Sound Art (London: Continuum, 2010), p. xiiGoogle Scholar.

44 Voegelin, Listening to Noise and Silence, p. xii.

45 Bernhard Leitner, 2002, The Whole Corporeality of Hearing: A Conversation Between Bernd Schulz and Bernhard Leitner, (accessed 21 September 2017).

46 Fischer-Lichte, Erika, The Transformative Power of Performance: A New Aesthetics, trans. IrisAesthetics, Saskia, trans. Jain, Saskia Iris (London: Routledge, 2008), p. 38CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

47 Fischer-Lichte, The Transformative Power of Performance, p. 60.

48 Dewey, John, Art as Experience (New York: Pedigree, 1980), p. 259Google Scholar.