Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T08:00:34.717Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Survey of New Solar Results

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

R. Tousey
R. Tousey*
Affiliation:
E. O. Hulburt Center for Space Research, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Following a brief historical review, new observations of the sun in the wavelength range 3000 to 20 Å are surveyed for the period since about 1958. Vehicles employed have been sounding rockets, the OSO (Orbiting Solar Observatories), balloons for the window 2300–1900 Å and for λ > 2700 Å, and small orbiting observatories such as Solrad, for XUV solar monitoring. Advances have been made in spectral resolution, using echelle gratings and also Fabry-Pérot interferometers. Much progress has been made towards increased spatial resolution, to obtain spectra of specific solar features and to analyse the chromosphere and corona. Methods employed include spectrographs that are stigmatic, or that have a stabilized solar image projected onto the slit; slitless objective-type spectrographs; and observations during a total eclipse. Spectra have been obtained of a solar flare, showing its form and intensity in the emission lines between 171 and 630 Å. From OSO 4–6 many XUV spectroheliograms and spectra have been obtained over the range 300 to 1350 Å, with spatial resolution 35 × 35 arc sec in OSO 6. Photographic XUV spectroheliograms have provided solar images with spatial resolution as great as 3 arc sec in some cases. Although much effort has been spent to increase the accuracy of XUV intensity measurements, a great deal remains to be done before the requirements of solar physics theory are satisfied. Line identification, however, is proceeding well, although more laboratory spectroscopy is needed. Not included in the survey is the Bragg Spectrometer X-ray range below about 20 Å.

Type
Part III: UV Astronomy
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 41: New Technique in Space Astronomy , 1971 , pp. 233 - 250
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1971 

References

References

Athay, R. G. and Zirker, J. B.: 1962, Astrophys. J. 136, 242.Google Scholar
Austin, W. E., Purcell, J. D., Snider, C. B., Tousey, R., and Widing, K. G.: 1967, in Smith-Rose, (ed.), Space Res. 7, 1252, North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Bates, B., Bradley, D. J., McKeith, C. D., McKeith, N. E., Burton, W. M., Paxton, H. J. B., Shenton, D. B., and Wilson, R.: 1969, Nature 224, 161.Google Scholar
Blamont, J. E. and Malique, C.: 1969, Astron. Astrophys. 3, 135.Google Scholar
Boland, B. C., Jones, B. B., Wilson, R., Engstrom, S. R. T., and Noci, G.: 1970 (to be published).Google Scholar
Bonnet, R. M.: 1968, Ann. Astrophys. 31, 597.Google Scholar
Bonnet, R. M. and Blamont, J. E.: 1968, Solar Phys. 3, 64.Google Scholar
Bonnet, R. M. Blamont, J. E., and Gildwarg, P.: 1967, Astrophys. J. 148, L115.Google Scholar
Brueckner, G. E., Bartoe, J. F., Nicolas, K. R., and Tousey, R.: 1970, Nature 226, 1132.Google Scholar
Burton, W. M. and Wilson, R.: 1965, Nature 207, 61.Google Scholar
Doschek, G. A. and Meekins, J. F.: 1970, Solar Phys. 13, 220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredga, K.: 1969, Solar Phys. 9, 358.Google Scholar
Freeman, F. F., and Jones, B. B.: 1970, Solar Phys. 15, 288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, F. F., Gabriel, A. H., Jones, B. B., and Jordan, C.: 1970 (to be published by the Royal Society).Google Scholar
Gabriel, A. H. and Jordan, C.: Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 145, 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, L.: 1969, Sci. Am. 220, 92.Google Scholar
Hinteregger, H. E. and Hall, L. A.: 1969, Solar Phys. 3, 175.Google Scholar
Jones, B. B., Boland, W. C., Wilson, R., and Engstrom, S. T. F.: 1970, in Houziaux, L. and Butler, H. E. (eds.), ‘Ultraviolet Stellar Spectra and Related Ground-Based Observations’, IAU Symp. 36, 271–3, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland,Google Scholar
Krieger, A., Vaiana, G., Van Speybroeck, L., Zehnpfennig, T., and Zombeck, M.: 1970, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 15, 612.Google Scholar
Lemaire, P.: 1969, Astrophys. Letters 3, 43.Google Scholar
Neupert, W. M. and Swartz, M.: 1970, Astrophys. J. Letters 160, L189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neupert, W. M., White, W. A., Gates, W. J., Swartz, M., and Young, R. M.: 1969, Solar Phys. 3, 183.Google Scholar
Parkinson, W. H. and Reeves, E. M.: 1969, Solar Phys. 10, 342.Google Scholar
Purcell, J. D., Packer, D. M., and Tousey, R.: 1959, Nature 184, 8.Google Scholar
Reeves, E. M. and Parkinson, W. H.: 1970, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 21, No. 181,Google Scholar
Sloan, W. A.: 1968, Solar Phys. 4, 196 and 5, 329.Google Scholar
Speer, R. J., Garton, W. R. S., Morgan, J. F., Nicholls, R. W., Goldberg, L., Parkinson, W. H., Reeves, E. M., Jones, T. J. L., Paxton, H. J. B., Shenton, D. B., and Wilson, R.: 1970, Nature 226, 249.Google Scholar
Tousey, R.: 1964, J. Roy. Astron. Soc. 5, 123.Google Scholar
Tousey, R.: 1967a, Appl. Opt. 6, 2044.Google Scholar
Tousey, R.: 1967b, Astrophys. J. 149, 239.Google Scholar
Tousey, R., Purcell, J. D., Austin, W. E., Garrett, D. L., and Widing, K. G.: 1964, in Muller, P. (ed.) Space Res. 4, 703, North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Tousey, R., Purcell, J. D., and Garrett, D. L.: 1967, Appl. Opt. 6, 365.Google Scholar
Tousey, R., Purcell, J. D., Garrett, D. L., and Widing, K. G.: 1970 (unpublished).Google Scholar
Tousey, R., Sandlin, G. D., and Purcell, J. D.: 1968, in Kiepenheuer, K.O. (ed.), ‘Structure and Development of Solar Active Regions’, IAU Symp. 35, 411.Google Scholar
Walker, A. B. C. and Rugge, H. R.: 1970, Astron. Astrophys. 5, 4.Google Scholar
Widing, K. G., Purcell, J. D., and Sandlin, G. D.: 1970, Solar Phys. 12, 52.Google Scholar

References to Solar Constant:

Allen, C. W.: 1958, Astrophysical Quantities, 2nd ed., p. 168, University of London, 1963.Google Scholar
Arveson, J. C., Griffin, R. N. Jr., and Pearson, B. D. Jr.: 1969, Appl. Opt. 8, 2215.Google Scholar
Drummond, A. J., Hickey, J. R., Scholes, W. J., and Laue, E. G.: 1968, Nature 218, 259.Google Scholar
Johnson, F. S.: 1954, J. Meteorol. 11, 431.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kondratiev, K. Ya, Nikolsky, G. A., Badinov, I. Ya, and Andreev, S. D.: 1967, Appl. Opt. 6, 197.Google Scholar
Labs, D. and Neckel, H.: 1968, Z. Astrophys. 69, 1.Google Scholar
Makarova, E. A. and Kharitonov, A. V.: 1968, Astron. Zh. 45, 752.Google Scholar
Murcray, D. G., Kyle, T. G., Kosters, J. J., and Gast, P. R.: 1968, The Measurement of the Solar Constant from High Altitude Balloons, University of Denver, Colo.Google Scholar
Stair, R. and Ellis, H. T.: 1968, J. Applied Meteorol. 7, 635.Google Scholar
Stair, R. and Johnston, R. G.: 1956, J. Nat. Bureau Standards 57, 205.Google Scholar
Thekaekara, M. P., Kruger, R., and Duncan, C. H.: 1969, Appl. Opt. 8, 1713.Google Scholar