Hostname: page-component-cd4964975-8cclj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-03-27T11:56:46.284Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true
  • English

Radio Source Surveys: Mergers at High Redshifts?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2016

Patrick J. McCarthy
Patrick J. McCarthy*
Affiliation:
Carnegie Observatory, 813 Santa Barbara St, Pasadena, CA 91101

Extract

HTML view is not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The early study of radio sources at visible wavelengths and the first empirical evidence that galaxies can have strong dynamical interactions are closely intertwined. Baade & Minkowski's (1954) model of Cygnus A as a pair of galaxies in collision, while now believed to be incorrect, presaged the merger-driven picture for the generation of radio sources (e.g. Heckman et al. 1986) by some 30 years. Morphological evidence for an association between mergers and radio loud AGN is seen in both the nearest radio galaxies (e.g. Cen A; Schweizer 1986) and in the most powerful sources at z ~ 0.1 - 0.3 (Stockton & Mackenty 1983; Hutchings et al. 1988; Heckman et al. 1986).

Type
Nuclear Activity
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 186: Galaxy Interactions at High and Low Redshift , 1999 , pp. 321 - 328
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1999 

References

Athreya, R. 1998, In The Most Distant Radio Galaxies, Kluwer Academic Press, Rottgering, H. et al. eds., in press Google Scholar
Athreya, R., McCarthy, P., Kapahi, V., & van Breugel, W. 1998, in prep.Google Scholar
Baker, J., & Hunstead, R., 1996, 461, L59 Google Scholar
Cimatti, A., Dey, A., van Breugel, W., Hurt, T., & Antonucci, R. 1997, 476, 677 Google Scholar
Dey, A., van Breugel, W., Vacca, W., & Antonucci, R. 1997, ApJ, 490, 698 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson, R., Tadhunter, C., Shaw, M., Clark, N, Morganti, R. 1995, MNRAS, 273, 29 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlop, J., et al. 1989, MNRAS, 240, 257 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlop, J., et al. 1996, Nature, 381, 581 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhardt, P. R. M. & Lebofsky, M. J. 1987, ApJ, 316, 70 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, T., et al. 1986, ApJ, 311, 526 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunstead, R., Baker, J., Kapahi, V., & Subramhanya, C. 1998, ApJS, in press Google Scholar
Hutchings, J. B., Johnson, I, & Pyke, R. 1988, ApJS, 66, 361 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapahi, V. K., et al. 1997, ApJS, in press.Google Scholar
Laing, R., Longair, M., & Riley, J. 1983, MNRAS, 204, 151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lilly, S. J., & Longair, M. S. 1984, MNRAS, 211, 833 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lilly, S. J. 1988 ApJ 340, 77 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, P., 1998, In The Most Distant Radio Galaxies, Kluwer Academic Press, Rottgering, H. et al. eds., in press Google Scholar
McCarthy, P., Kapahi, V. K., van Breugel, W., Persson, S. E., Athreya, R. M., & Subrahmanya, C. R. 1996, ApJS, 107, 19 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rush, B., McCarthy, P., Athreya, R., & Persson, S. 1997, ApJ, 484, 163 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockton, A. & Mackenty, J. W., 1983, Nature, 305, 678 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweizer, F. 1986, Science, 231, 227 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinrad, H., & Djorgovski, S. 1984, PASP, 96, 795 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinrad, H., et al. 1997, 484, 581 Google Scholar