Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T02:28:37.013Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Massive Contact Binary Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2017

Kam-Ching Leung
Kam-Ching Leung*
Affiliation:
Behlen Observatory University of Nebraska Lincoln, NE 68588-0111 U.S.A.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In recent years very massive single stars have been found to be upward of 90 M⊙. Massive contact binary systems have been found among the early-type systems, but their masses are far less than those reported for single stars. The most massive component found is about 60 M⊙.

It is generally believed that no late-type very massive stars have been detected (Humphreys and Davidson). This may be due to the large amount of mass loss from stellar wind. Recently, several extremely long-period late-type binary systems have been found to be contact systems. Two systems, UU Cnc and 5 Cet, have their primary components with masses exceeding 40 M⊙, and K spectra. This result tends to suggest that close or interacting binary stars may be able to preserve the mass loss from stellar wind within the binary systems.

Type
Session IV. Binaries
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 143: Wolf–Rayet Stars and Interrelations with other Massive Stars in Galaxies , 1991 , pp. 207 - 212
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1991 

References

REFERENCES

Adersen, J. and Gronbech, B. 1975, Astron. Astrophys., 45, 107.Google Scholar
Bloomer, R.H., Burk, E.W., King, C. and Millis, R.L. 1979, Bull. Amer. Astron. Soc., 11, 439.Google Scholar
Hilditch, R.W. and Lloyd Evans, T. 1985, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 213, 75.Google Scholar
Humphreys, R.M. and Davidson, K. 1979, Astrophys. J., 232, 409.Google Scholar
Lee, Y.S., Nha, I.S. and Leung, K.C. 1991, Astrophys. J.,Google Scholar
Leung, K.C. 1988, Critical Observations Vs Physical Models For Close Binary Stars ed. by Leung, K.C. (New York: Gordon and Breach), p. 93.Google Scholar
Leung, K.C., Moffat, A.F.J. and Seggewis, W. 1983, Astrophys. J., 265, 961.Google Scholar
Leung, K.C. and Schneider, D.P. 1978a, Astrophys. J., 222, 924.Google Scholar
Leung, K.C. and Schneider, D.P. 1978b, Astrophys. J., 224, 565.Google Scholar
Li, Y.F. and Leung, K.C. 1985, Astrophys. J., 298, 345.Google Scholar
Li, Y.F. and Leung, K.C. 1987, Astrophys. J., 313, 801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Z.Y., Leung, K.C. and Ding, Y.R. 1988, Acta Astron. Sinica, 29, 374.Google Scholar
Milano, L., Vittone, A., Ciatti, F., Mammano, R. and Strazzulla, G. 1981, Astron. Astrophys, 100, 59.Google Scholar
Popper, D.M. 1980, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astropys., 18, 115.Google Scholar
Schneider, D.P. and Leung, K.C. 1978, Astrophys. J., 223, 202.Google Scholar