Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T05:04:52.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

IAU North Poles and Rotation Parameters for Natural Satellites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2017

J. H. Lieske*
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology 4800 Oak Grove Dr. M/S 301-150 Pasadena, CA 91109 USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In 1970 the IAU defined any object's north pole to be that axis of rotation which lies north of the solar system's invariable plane. A competing definition in widespread use at some institutions followed the “right hand rule” whereby the “north” axis of rotation was generally said to be that that of the rotational angular momentum.

A Working Group has periodically updated the recommended values of planet and satellite poles and rotation rates in accordance with the IAU definition of north and the IAU definition of prime meridian.

In this paper we review the IAU definitions of north and of the location of prime meridian and we present the algorithm which has been employed in determining the rotational parameters of the natural satellites.

Type
Celestial Reference Frame
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 

References

Contopoulos, G., Jappel, A., (Eds.): 1974, Transactions IAU XVB (Proceedings of the Fifteenth General Assembly Sydney 1973) , D. Reidel, Dordrecht, p.108.Google Scholar
Davies, M.E., Abalakin, V.K., Cross, C.A., Duncombe, R.L., Masursky, H., Morando, B., Owen, T.C., Seidelmann, P.K., Sinclair, A.T., Wilkins, G.A., Tjuflin, Y.S.: 1980, ‘Report of the IAU Working Group on Cartographic Coordinates and Rotational Elements of the Planets and Satellites’, Celestial Mechanics 22, 205230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, M.E., Abalakin, V.K., Lieske, J.H., Seidelmann, P.K., Sinclair, A.T., Sinzi, A.M., Smith, B.A., Tjuflin, Y.S.: 1983, ‘Report of the IAU Working Group on Cartographic Coordinates and Rotational Elements of the Planets and Satellites: 1982’, Celestial Mechanics 29, 309321.Google Scholar
Davies, M.E., Abalakin, V.K., Burša, M., Lederle, T., Lieske, J.H., Rapp, R.H., Seidelmann, P.K., Sinclair, A.T., Teifel, V.G., Tjuflin, Y.S.: 1986, ‘Report of the IAU/IAG/COSPAR Working Group on Cartographic Coordinates and Rotational Elements of the Planets and Satellites: 1985’, Celestial Mechanics 39, 106113.Google Scholar
Davies, M.E., Abalakin, V.K., Burša, M., Hunt, G.E., Lieske, J.H., Morando, B., Rapp, R.H., Seidelmann, P.K., Sinclair, A.T., Tjuflin, Y.S.: 1989, ‘Report of the IAU/IAG/COSPAR Working Group on Cartographic Coordinates and Rotational Elements of the Planets and Satellites: 1988’, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy 46, 187204.Google Scholar
Davies, M.E., Abalakin, V.K., Brahic, A., Burša, M., Chovitz, B.H., Lieske, J.H., Seidelmann, P.K., Sinclair, A.T., Tjuflin, Y.S.: 1992, ‘Report of the IAU/IAG/COSPAR Working Group on Cartographic Coordinates and Rotational Elements of the Planets and Satellites: 1991’, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy , In Press.Google Scholar
de Jager, C., Jappel, A., (Eds.): 1971, Transactions IAU XIVB (Proceedings of the Fourteenth General Assembly Brighton 1970) , D. Reidel, Dordrecht, p. 128.Google Scholar
Kerr, R.A.: 1989, ‘Research News: Which Way is North? Ask Right-Handed Astronomers’, Science 246, 999.Google Scholar
Lieske, J.H.: 1993, ‘Algorithm for IAU North Poles and Rotation Parameters’, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy , In Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Standish, E.M.:1981, ‘Two Differing Definitions of the Dynamical Equinox and the Mean Obliquity’, Astron. Astrophys. 101, L17L18.Google Scholar