Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T22:20:54.435Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Giant Arcs – Spherical Shells?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2017

Avishai Dekel
Affiliation:
Racah Institute of Physics, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91904, Israel
Erez Braun
Affiliation:
Racah Institute of Physics, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91904, Israel

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A noticeable fact about the giant luminous arcs, which have been detected in a few high-redshift clusters of galaxies (see contributions by Petrosian and by Mellier in this volume), is that they seem to be segments of almost perfectly circular rings – in one case spanning about one third of a circle. If this is a characteristic property of these arcs, they cannot be segments of randomly-oriented three-dimensional rings, which, when viewed from a random direction, should look acircular in most cases. Perhaps the most generic source for a circular ring is a limb-brightened luminous shell – as in planetary nebulae and supernova remnants. Such shells can naturally arise, for example, from explosion-generated shocks which cooled and fragmented into stars. If the sources are shells, and the arcs are either resolved or their thickness is determined by the seeing conditions (and by the CCD pixle size), there is a very general upper-limit on the possible surface-brightness contrast between the arcs and the regions encompassed by them. For the detected arcs, without any special finetuning, this limit is ≃ 3. It might become twice as big if the shell is transparent and the interior is opaque. This limit could exclude the shell model if the preliminary claims for a detected contrast greater than 10 are confirmed. It is interesting to note that the famous ring nebula presents a similar problem. We checked several mechanisms, such as stimulated radiation, which could, in principle, enhance the observed contrast while retaining the spherical symmetry; if such a mechanism is responsible for the enhanced contrast, it should show clear imprints on the spectrum. The figure shows the surface-brightess profile for a shell of thickness d.

Type
Appendix 1: Poster Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1988