Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T22:55:37.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Earth rotation from radio interferometric tracking of GPS satellites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2017

R. I. Abbot
Affiliation:
Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
R. W. King
Affiliation:
Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Y. Bock
Affiliation:
Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
C. C. Counselman III
Affiliation:
Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Radio-interferometric tracking of the Global Positioning System (GPS) satellites offers a new technique for regular monitoring of variations in the earth's rotation. The observations are sensitive to pole position and length-of-day, at a level of precision which may make this technique competitive with satellite and lunar laser ranging and very long baseline interferometry (VLBI). The present limitations are the number of satellites and tracking stations available and inadequate modeling of non-gravitational forces on the satellites. The potential advantages are rapid turn-around and minimal incremental cost. We have performed a preliminary analysis using six days of observations from a four-station network. Comparison of earth rotation values from our GPS analysis with values obtained by VLBI and laser ranging reveals differences after five days of 0.9 ms in UT1, 0.04″ in x and 0.07″ in y. These differences reflect errors in the GPS determinations due primarily to inadequate modeling of non-gravitational forces.

Type
III. Determination of Earth Rotation Parameters
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1988 

References

Abbot, R. I., Bock, Y., Counselman, C. C. III, King, R. W., Gourevitch, S. A., and Rosen, B. J., Interferometric determination of GPS orbits, in Proc. 1st Inter. Sym. on Precise Positioning with GPS, Goad, C., edit., NOAA, Rockville, Md, pp. 6372, 1985.Google Scholar
Bock, Y., Gourevitch, S. A., Abbot, R. I., Counselman, C. C. III, King, R. W., and Abbot, R. I., Interferometric analysis of GPS phase observations, Man. Geod., 11, No. 4, 1986.Google Scholar
Fliegel, H. F., Feess, W. A., Layton, W. C., and Rhodus, N. W., The GPS radiation force model, Proc. 1st Inter. Sym. on Precise Positioning with GPS, Goad, C., edit., NOAA, Rockville, Md, pp. 113120, 1985.Google Scholar
IRIS Earth Orientation Bulletin, No. 21, issued by Subcommission International Radio Interferometric Surveying, National Geodetic Survey, NOAA, Rockville, Md, 1985.Google Scholar
King, R.W., Kolaczek, B. A., and Shapiro, I. I., Accuracies of recent observations of the Earth's rotation (abstract), Eos Trans. AGU, 65, 187, 1984.Google Scholar
Lerch, F. S., Klosko, S. M., and Patel, G. B., A refined gravity model for LAGEOS (GEM L-2), Geophys. Res. Lett., 9, 12631266, 1982.Google Scholar
Melbourne, W., Anderle, R., Feissel, M., King, R., McCarthy, D., Smith, D., Tapley, B., and Vicente, R., Project MERIT Standards, Circ. No. 167, U. S. Naval Observatory, Washington, D.C., 1983.Google Scholar
Melbourne, W. G., Clynch, J. R., Hager, B. H., Merrell, R. L., Moseley, S., Schutz, B. E., and Ware, R. R., The March 1985 demonstration of GPS-based geodesy: an overview (abstract), Eos Trans. AGU, 66, 843, 1985.Google Scholar
Rizos, C., and Stolz, A., Force modelling for GPS satellite orbits, Proc. 1st Inter. Sym. on Precise Positioning with GPS, Goad, C., edit., NOAA, Rockville, MD, 8798, 1985.Google Scholar
Tapley, B. D., Schutz, B. E., and Eanes, R. J., Station coordinates, baselines, and earth rotation from LAGEOS laser ranging: 1976–1984, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 92359248, 1985.Google Scholar