Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T01:44:18.665Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dynamo Theory of the Sun's General Magnetic Field on the Basis of a Mean-Field Magnetohydrodynamics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

F. Krause  and
K.-H. Rädler
F. Krause
Affiliation:
Zentralinstitut für Astrophysik, Potsdam, Germany
K.-H. Rädler
Affiliation:
Zentralinstitut für Astrophysik, Potsdam, Germany

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An outline of the mean-field magnetohydrodynamics suggested and developed by M. Steenbeck and the authors and its application to the dynamo theory of the solar cycle is presented. Four basic requirements are formulated which have to be satisfied by any dynamo model which claims to explain the solar cycle. The models investigated allow conclusions about the differential rotation. In this connection Leighton's work is criticized.

Type
Part VIII: Theories of Large Scale Fields and the Activity Cycle
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 43: Solar Magnetic Fields , 1971 , pp. 770 - 779
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1971 

References

Babcock, H.: 1961, Astrophys. J. 133, 572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitremann, M. and Frisch, U.: 1969, Compt. Rend. 268, B705.Google Scholar
Krause, F.: 1968, Habilitationsschrift , Univ. of Jena.Google Scholar
Krause, F.: 1969, Proc. 4th Consult. Solar Phys. and Hydromagn. , Sopot 1966, Acta Univ. Wratislaviensis No. 77, 157.Google Scholar
Krause, F.: 1969, Mber. Deut. Akad. Wiss. Berlin 11, 188.Google Scholar
Krause, F. and Steenbeck, M.: 1965, Proc. 3rd Consult. Solar Phys. and Hydromagn., Tatranska Lomnica 1964, Czech. Acad. Sci. Astron. Inst. Publ. 51, 36.Google Scholar
Leighton, R. B.: 1969, Astrophys. J. 156, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffatt, H. K.: 1970, J. Fluid Mech. 41, 435.Google Scholar
Rädler, K.-H.: 1968, Z. Naturforsch. 23a, 1841, 1851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rädler, K.-H.: 1969, Mber. Deut. Akad. Wiss. 11, 194.Google Scholar
Steenbeck, M. and Krause, F.: 1966, Z. Naturforsch. 21a, 1285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steenbeck, M. and Krause, F.: 1968, Astron. Nachr. 291, 49, 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steenbeck, M., Krause, F., and Rädler, K.-H.: 1966, Z. Naturforsch. 21a, 369.Google Scholar
Stenflo, J. O.: 1971, this volume, p. 714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, S. I.: 1970, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 58, 153.Google Scholar
Wilcox, J. M.: 1971, this volume, p. 744.Google Scholar