Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-22T05:44:23.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Clustering Properties of Cold Dark Matter Universes and the CFA Redshift Survey: A Uniform Comparison

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2017

Richard Nolthenius
Affiliation:
Steward Observatory
Simon White
Affiliation:
Steward Observatory

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We have compared the properties of galaxy groups in the CfA redshift survey to those in the cold dark matter simulations of Davis, Efstathiou, Frenk and White (1985). Redshift catalogs (four realizations) were made from the open universe (unbiased; mass follows light) simulations at expansion factors of 1.8 (Ω=.3, labelled T1) and 3.2 (Ω=.2, labeled T2) relative to initial conditions, and from the biased formation version of the Ω=1 simulation (5 realizations) at expansion factor 1.4. The T1, T2 and biased catalog sets were volume limited at distances of 5000, 3000 and 6500 km s−1 respectively, and magnitude limited (m≤14.5) beyond. They were then randomly culled by 25%, 9% and 10%, respectively, to match the density of comparison versions of the CfA Redshift Survey which were similarly volume limited. We have devised a percolation type grouping algorithm which lets the linking distance on the sky increase with distance in the magnitude limited regions, while keeping the radial velocity linking criteria fixed. We've verified that this produces groups with density contrast uncorrelated with distance and (unlike the Geller-Huchra criteria) M/L uncorrelated with group size for the open models. M/L may, however, show a slight negative correlation with distance.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1987 

References

Davis, M., Efstathiou, G., Frenk, C., and White, S. D. M., 1985, Ap. J. 292, 371 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geller, M. J. and Huchra, J., 1983, Ap. J Supp. 22, 61 Google Scholar