Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T02:46:11.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chemical Models of Circumstellar Disks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2016

Yuri Aikawa
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
Eric Herbst
Affiliation:
Departments of Physics and Astronomy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We investigate the evolution of molecular abundances in circumstellar disks around young stars via numerical simulations. The results are compared with the composition of comets and radio observations of protoplanetary disks. First, we consider the molecular evolution in the midplane of the disk. Because of ionization by cosmic-rays or decay of radioactive nuclei, the molecular evolution in the region R ≳ 10 AU bears some similarity to that in molecular clouds. Considerable amounts of CO and N2, which come from the cloud core, are transformed, however, into CO2, CH4, NH3, and HCN. In regions where the temperature is low enough for these products to freeze onto grains, they accumulate in ice mantles. In the inner warmer regions of the disk, these molecules are desorbed from the mantles and transformed by gas-phase reactions into less volatile molecules, such as larger hydrocarbons, which then freeze out. Molecular abundances both in the gas phase and in ice mantles crucially depend on the temperature and thus vary significantly with the distance from the central star. Molecular abundances in ice mantles show reasonable agreement with the composition of comets. Our model suggests that comets formed in different regions of the disk having different molecular compositions.

Secondly, we report two-dimensional (R, Z) distributions of molecules in circumstellar disks. In the Z-direction, which is perpendicular to the midplane, there is a steep gradient of density and radiation field. Since the density is lower in the regions removed from the midplane, there are significant amounts of gas-phase species in these regions, while most species are adsorbed onto grains in the midplane. Chemistry in the surface regions is also affected by the X-rays and UV radiation from the central star, and UV radiation from the interstellar field. The molecular abundances in these regions differ significantly from those in the midplane. Radicals such as CN are especially abundant near the disk surface. We obtain radial distributions of molecular column densities and averaged molecular abundances, which show reasonable agreement with the observational data at millimeter wavelengths.

Type
Part 7. Circumstellar Disks
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2000 

References

A'Hearn, M.F., et al. 1995, Icarus, 118, 223 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aikawa, Y., Miyama, S.M., Nakano, T., & Umebayashi, T. 1996, ApJ, 467, 684 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aikawa, Y., et al. 1997, ApJ, 486, L51 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aikawa, Y., et al. 1998, in Chemistry and Physics of Molecules and Grains in Space (London: The Royal Society of Chemistry), 281 Google Scholar
Aikawa, Y., Umebayashi, T., Nakano, T., & Miyama, S.M. 1999, ApJ, 519, 705 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aikawa, Y. & Herbst, E. 1999a, ApJ, 526, 314 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aikawa, Y. & Herbst, E. 1999b, A&A, 351, 233 Google Scholar
Basri, G. & Bertout, C. 1993, in Protostars and Planets III, eds. Levy, E.H. & Lunine, J.I. (Tucson: Univ. of Arizona Press), 543 Google Scholar
Beckwith, S.V.W., Sargent, A.I., Chini, R.S., & Güsten, R. 1990, AJ, 99, 924 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutrey, A., Guilloteau, S., & Guélin, M. 1997, A&A, 317, L55 Google Scholar
Finocchi, F. & Gail, H-P. 1997, A&A 327, 825 Google Scholar
Glassgold, A.E., Najita, J., & Igea, J. 1997, ApJ, 480, 344 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilloteau, S. & Dutrey, A. 1998, A&A, 339, 467 Google Scholar
Handa, T., et al. 1995, ApJ, 449, 894 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayashi, C. 1981, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl., 70, 35 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, H.-H., et al. 1996, A&A, 311, 690 Google Scholar
Lewis, J.S., Barshay, S.S., & Noyes, B. 1979, ICARUS, 37, 190 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynden-Bell, D. & Pringle, J.E. 1974, MNRAS, 168, 603 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prinn, R.G. 1993, in Protostars and Planets III, eds. Levy, E.H. & Lunine, J.I. (Tucson: Univ. of Arizona Press), 1005 Google Scholar
Strom, K.M., et al. 1989, AJ, 97, 1451 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umebayashi, T. & Nakano, T. 1981, PASJ, 33, 617 Google Scholar
van Dishoeck, E. & Black, J. 1988, ApJ, 334, 771 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willacy, K., Klahr, H.H., Millar, T.J., & Henning, Th. 1998, A&A, 338, 995 Google Scholar