Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

SOCIAL ATTITUDES AND SPEECH RATINGS: EFFECTS OF POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE BIAS ON MULTIAGE LISTENERS’ JUDGMENTS OF SECOND LANGUAGE SPEECH

  • Kym Taylor Reid (a1), Pavel Trofimovich (a1) and Mary Grantham O’Brien (a2)

Abstract

This study examined whether social bias manipulation can influence how naïve multiage listeners evaluate second language (L2) speech. Sixty native English-speaking listeners (Montreal residents) rated audio recordings of 40 Quebec French speakers of L2 English for five dimensions of oral performance (accentedness, comprehensibility, segmental accuracy, intonation, flow) using 1,000-point continuous scales. Immediately before rating, 20 listeners heard critical comments about Quebec French speakers’ English language skills, while 20 heard positive comments. Twenty listeners (baseline group) received no manipulation. Compared to baseline listeners, positively oriented listeners (younger and older) rated four of five dimensions more favorably. However, listeners’ behavior diverged under negative bias. Compared to age-matched baseline listeners, younger listeners upgraded speakers while older listeners downgraded speakers for all targeted measures. Findings cast doubt on the relative stability of L2 speech ratings and point to the importance of social context and generational differences in untrained rater assessments of L2 speaking performance.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Kym Taylor Reid, Department of Education, Concordia University (FG 5.150), 1455 de Maisonneuve Blvd W., Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3G 1M8. E-mail: kym.taylor@concordia.ca

Footnotes

Hide All

This study was supported by grants from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada to the second and third authors. We are deeply grateful to Zeshan Yao for his programming assistance and to the anonymous reviewers and the editor, Susan Gass, for the insightful comments and suggestions that helped us refine this article.

The experiment in this article earned Open Data and Open Materials badges for transparent practices. All data and materials are available at https://osf.io/7gvkt.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 148.
Beaudreau, S. A., Storandt, M., & Strube, M. J. (2006). A comparison of narratives told by younger and older adults. Experimental Aging Research, 32, 105117.
Beinhoff, B. (2013). Perceiving identity through accent: Attitudes towards non-native speakers and their accents in English. Oxford, UK: Peter Lang.
Beukeboom, C. J., & Semin, G. R. (2006). How mood turns on language. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 553566.
Bodenhausen, G. V., & Moreno, K. N. (2000). How do I feel about them? The role of affective reactions in intergroup perception. In Bless, H. & Forgas, J. P. (Eds.), The message within: Subjective experience in social cognition and behavior (pp. 283303). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
Bourhis, R. Y., & Giles, H. (1977). The language of intergroup distinctiveness. In Giles, H. (Ed.), Language, ethnicity, and intergroup relations (pp. 119135). London, UK: Academic.
Bourhis, R. Y., Sioufi, R., & Sachdev, I. (2012). Ethnolinguistic interaction and multilingual communication. In Giles, H. (Ed.), The handbook of intergroup communication (pp. 100115). New York, NY: Routledge.
Caplan, S. E., & Samter, W. (1999). The role of facework in younger and older adults’ evaluations of social support messages. Communication Quarterly, 47, 245264.
Cargile, A. C., & Giles, H. (1997). Understanding language attitudes: Exploring listener affect and identity. Language and Communication, 17, 195217.
Corbeil, J. C. (2007). L’embarras des langues: Origine, conception et évolution de la politique linguistique québécoise. Montréal, QC: Québec Amérique.
Dalton-Puffer, C., Kaltenboeck, G., & Smit, U. (1997). Learner attitudes and L2 pronunciation in Austria. World Englishes, 16, 115128.
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (1997). Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility: Evidence from four L1s. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 116.
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2015). Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Derwing, T. M., Rossiter, M. J., & Munro, M. J. (2002). Teaching native speakers to listen to foreign-accented speech. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 23, 245259.
Derwing, T. M., Rossiter, M. J., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R. I. (2004). Second language fluency: Judgments on different tasks. Language Learning, 54, 655679.
Dragojevic, M., Gasiorek, J., & Giles, H. (2016). Communication accommodation theory. In Berger, C. R. & Roloff, M. E. (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of interpersonal communication (pp. 120). New York, NY: Wiley.
Dragojevic, M., & Giles, H. (2016). I don’t like you because you’re hard to understand: The role of processing fluency in the language attitudes process. Human Communication Research, 42, 396420.
Eskenazi, M. (2009). An overview of spoken language technology for education. Speech Communication, 51, 832844.
Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London, UK: Sage.
Ford, C. E. (1984). The influence of speech variety on teachers’ evaluation of students with comparable academic ability. TESOL Quarterly, 18, 2540.
Giles, H., & Rakić, T. (2014). Language attitudes: Social determinants and consequences of language variation. In Holtgraves, T. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 1126). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Giles, H., & Watson, B. (Eds.). (2013). The social meanings of language, dialect, and accent: International perspectives on speech styles. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Girard, F., Floccia, C., & Goslin, J. (2008). Perception and awareness of accents in young children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 26, 409433.
Gluszek, A., & Dovidio, J. F. (2010a). Speaking with a nonnative accent: Perceptions of bias, communication difficulties, and belonging in the United States. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, 224234.
Gluszek, A., & Dovidio, J. F. (2010b). The way they speak: A social psychological perspective on the stigma of non-native accents in communication. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 214237.
Gluszek, A., Newheiser, A.-K., & Dovidio, J. F. (2011). Social psychological manipulations and accent strength. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 30, 2845.
Hansen, K., & Dovidio, J. F. (2016). Social dominance manipulation, nonnative accents, and hiring recommendations. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 22, 544551.
Hansen, K., Rakić, T., & Steffens, M. C. (2014). When actions speak louder than words: Preventing discrimination of nonstandard speakers. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33, 6877.
Harding, L. (2012). Pronunciation assessment. The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hu, G., & Lindemann, S. (2009). Stereotypes of Cantonese English, apparent native/non-native status, and their effect on non-native English speakers’ perception. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 30, 253269.
Isaacs, T. (2013). Assessing pronunciation. In Kunnan, A. J. (Ed.), The companion to language assessment (pp. 140155). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Isaacs, T., & Trofimovich, P. (2012). Deconstructing comprehensibility: Identifying the linguistic influences on listeners’ L2 comprehensibility ratings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 475505.
James, L. E., Burke, D. M., Austin, A., & Hulme, E. (1998). Production and perception of “verbosity” in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 13, 355367.
Kang, O., & Rubin, D. (2009). Reverse linguistic stereotyping: Measuring the effect of listener expectations on speech evaluation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 28, 441456.
Kang, O., Rubin, D., & Lindemann, S. (2015). Mitigating U.S. undergraduates’ attitudes toward international teaching assistants. TESOL Quarterly, 49, 681706.
Kempe, V., Rookes, M., & Swarbrigg, L. (2013). Speaker emotion can affect ambiguity production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 15791590.
Kinzler, K. D., Dupoux, E., & Spelke, E. S. (2007). The native language of social cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 1257712580.
Kinzler, K. D., Shutts, K., DeJesus, J., & Spelke, E. S. (2009). Accent trumps race in guiding children’s social preferences. Social Cognition, 27, 623634.
Labov, W. (1972). On the mechanism of language change. In Gumperz, J. J. & Hymes, D. (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics (pp. 312338). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Lamarre, P., Paquette, J., Kahn, E., & Ambrosi, S. (2002). Multilingual Montreal: Listening in on the language practices of young Montrealers. Canadian Ethnic Studies, 34, 4778.
Lindemann, S. (2002). Listening with an attitude: A model of native-speaker comprehension of non-native speakers in the United States. Language in Society, 31, 419441.
Lindemann, S., & Subtirelu, N. (2013). Reliably biased: The role of listener expectation in the perception of second language speech. Language Learning, 63, 567594.
Molden, D. C. (Ed.) (2014). Understanding priming effects in social psychology. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Mulac, A. (1976). Effects of obscene language upon three dimensions of listener attitude. Communications Monographs, 43, 300307.
Munro, M. J. (1995). Nonsegmental factors in foreign accent: Ratings of filtered speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 1734.
Niedzielski, N. (1999). The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18, 6285.
Paladino, M.-P., Poddesu, L., Rauzi, M., Vaes, J., Cadinu, M., & Forer, D. (2009). Second language competence in the Italian-speaking population of Alto Adige/Südtirol: Evidence for linguistic stereotype threat. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 28, 222243.
Pantos, A. J., & Perkins, A. W. (2013). Measuring implicit and explicit attitudes toward foreign accented speech. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32, 320.
Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D, & R Core Team (2018). nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-137. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme.
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect size in L2 research. Language Learning, 64, 878912.
Rakić, T., Steffens, M. C., & Mummendey, A. (2011). Blinded by the accent! The minor role of looks in ethnic categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 1629.
Rowe, G., Hirsh, J. B., & Anderson, A. K. (2007). Positive affect increases the breadth of attentional selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 383388.
Rubin, D. L. (1992). Nonlanguage factors affecting undergraduates’ judgments of nonnative English-speaking teaching assistants. Research in Higher Education, 33, 511531.
Ryan, E. B. (1983). Social psychological mechanisms underlying native speaker evaluations of non-native speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5, 148159.
Ryan, E. B., Carranza, M. A., & Moffie, R. W. (1977). Reactions toward varying degrees of accentedness in the speech of Spanish-English bilinguals. Language and Speech, 20, 267273.
Staples, S., Kang, O., & Wittner, E. (2014). Considering interlocutors in university discourse communities: Impacting U.S. undergraduates’ perceptions of ITAs through a structured contact program. English for Specific Purposes, 35, 5465.
Stroebe, W., & Insko, C. A. (2013). Stereotype, prejudice, and discrimination: Changing conceptions in theory and research. In Bar-Tal, D., Graumann, C. F., Kruglanski, A. W., & Stroebe, W. (Eds.), Stereotyping and prejudice: Changing conceptions (pp. 336). New York, NY: Springer.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Worchel, S. & Austin, W. G. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 724). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Vissers, C. T. W. M., Virgillito, D., Fitzgerald, D. A., Speckens, A. E. M., Tendolkar, I., Van Oostrom, I., & Chwilla, D. J. (2010). The influence of mood on the processing of syntactic anomalies: Evidence from P600. Neuropsychologia, 48, 35213531.
Wigboldus, D. H., Spears, R., & Semin, G. R. (2005). When do we communicate stereotypes? Influence of the social context on the linguistic expectancy bias. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8, 215230.
Winke, P., Gass, S., & Myford, C. (2013). Raters’ L2 background as a potential source of bias in rating oral performance. Language Testing, 30, 231252.
Yao, Z., Saito, K., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T. (2013). Z-Lab [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://github.com/ZeshanYao/Z-Lab.
Yzerbyt, V. Y., Schadron, G., Leyens, J. P., & Rocher, S. (1994). Social judgeability: The impact of meta-informational cues on the use of stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 4855.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Reid et al. supplementary material
Reid et al. supplementary material 1

 Word (576 KB)
576 KB

SOCIAL ATTITUDES AND SPEECH RATINGS: EFFECTS OF POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE BIAS ON MULTIAGE LISTENERS’ JUDGMENTS OF SECOND LANGUAGE SPEECH

  • Kym Taylor Reid (a1), Pavel Trofimovich (a1) and Mary Grantham O’Brien (a2)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.