Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

LEARNING NOVEL MORPHOLOGY: The Role of meaning and orientation of attention at initial exposure

  • Emma Marsden (a1), John Williams (a2) and Xierong Liu (a3)

Abstract

A large body of research has shown that suffixes—both inflectional and derivational—can be primed with adult native speakers, which informs our understanding of storage and access to morphology in mature systems. However, this line of research has not yet been conducted from an acquisition perspective: Little is known about whether or not representations of suffixes are formed after very little exposure to new morphology and, if so, about the nature of those representations or about the influence of attentional orientation and meaning at this initial stage. The three experiments reported here begin to address this gap by investigating the nature of suffixal representations following exposure to a small regular system of suffixed words. The experiment used crossmodal priming of recognition memory judgments to probe morphological representation. Although the lack of priming suggested that abstract morphological representations were not yet established, recognition judgments showed a clear sensitivity to sublexical morphemic units. The pattern of results was unaffected by the orientation of attention or the assignation of meaning to the words or suffixes during training. Offline tests of learning stem and suffix meanings also showed that both were learned to some extent even when attention was not oriented to their meanings and that the resulting knowledge was partially implicit. Thus, there was evidence of sensitivity to both the forms and meanings of the suffixes but not at the level required to support crossmodal priming. We argue that the reason for this may lie in the episodic nature of the knowledge gained after brief exposure.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Emma Marsden, Centre for Language Learning Research, Department of Education, University of York, York, UK, YO10 5DD. E-mail: emma.marsden@york.ac.uk.

References

Hide All
Aronoff, M. (1994). Morphology by itself. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Aslin, R. N., Saffran, J. R., & Newport, E. L. (1998). Computation of conditional probability statistics by 8-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 9, 321324.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2000). Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning, and use. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bernhardt, E. (1987). Cognitive processes in L2: An examination of reading behaviors. In Lantolf, J. & Labarca, A. (Eds.), Research in second language learning: Focus on the classroom (pp. 3551). Westport, CT: Ablex.
Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28, 297332.
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006). Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 342.
Clahsen, H., Felser, C., Neubauer, K., Sato, M., & Silva, R. (2010). Morphological structure in native and nonnative language processing. Language Learning, 60, 2143.
Cleeremans, A. (2006). Conscious and unconscious cognition: A graded, dynamic, perspective. In Jing, Q., Rosenzweig, M. R., d’Ydewalle, G., Zhang, H., Chen, H.-C., & Zhang, K. (Eds.), Progress in psychological science around the world: Vol. 1. Neural, cognitive and developmental issues (pp. 401418). New York: Psychology Press.
Conway, M. A. (2009). Episodic memories. Neuropsychologia, 47, 23052313.
DeKeyser, R. M. (1995). Learning second language grammar rules: An experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 379410.
Dienes, Z. (2008). Subjective measures of unconscious knowledge. Progress in Brain Research, 168, 4964.
Dienes, Z., & Scott, R. (2005). Measuring unconscious knowledge: Distinguishing structural knowledge and judgment knowledge. Psychological Research, 69, 338351.
Diependaele, K., Duñabeitia, J.-A., Morris, J., & Keuleers, E. (2011). Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 344358.
Di Sciullo, A. M., & Williams, E. (1987). On the definition of word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dumay, N., & Gaskell, M. G. (2007). Sleep-associated changes in the mental representation of spoken words. Psychological Science, 18, 3539.
Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2008). Does darkness lead to happiness? Masked suffix priming effects. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 10021020.
Endress, A. D., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (2009). Perceptual and memory constraints on language acquisition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 348353.
Feldman, L., Kostić, A., Basnight-Brown, D., Filipović Durdević, D., & Pastizzo, M. (2010). Morphological facilitation for regular and irregular verb formations in native and non-native speakers: Little evidence for two distinct mechanisms. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 119135.
Feldman, L., O’Connor, P. A., & Moscoso del Prado Martín, F. (2009). Early morphological processing is morpho-semantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: A violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 684691.
Gold, B., & Rastle, K. (2007). Neural correlates of morphological decomposition during visual word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 19831993.
Goldshneider, S. M., & DeKeyser, R. M. (2001). Explaining the “natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition” in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 51, 150.
Gor, K. (2010). Introduction. Beyond the obvious: Do second language learners process inflectional morphology? Language Learning, 60, 120.
Hawkins, R. (2001). Second language syntax: A generative introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Jiang, N. (2004). Morphological insensitivity in second language processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 603634.
Jiang, N. (2007). Selective integration of linguistic knowledge in adult second language learning. Language Learning, 57, 133.
Jiménez, L., & Méndez, C. (1999). Which attention is needed for implicit sequence learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 236259.
Klein, W. (1986). Second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Laudanna, A., Burani, C., & Cermele, A. (1994). Prefixes as processing units. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 295316.
Lemhöfer, K., Dijkstra, T., Schriefers, H., Baayen, H. R., Grainger, J., & Zwitserlood, P. (2008). Native language influences on word recognition in a second language: A mega-study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1231.
Leow, R. P. (1997). Attention, awareness, and foreign language behavior. Language Learning, 47, 467505.
Leow, R. P. (2000). A study of the role of awareness in foreign language behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 557584.
Leung, J., & Williams, J. N. (2011). The implicit learning of mappings between forms and contextually-derived meanings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 3355.
Leung, J., & Williams, J. N. (2012). Constraints on implicit learning of grammatical form-meaning connections. Language Learning, 62, 634662.
Lindsay, S., & Gaskell, M. G. (2010). A complementary systems account of word learning in L1 and L2. Language Learning, 60, 4563.
Logan, G. D., & Etherton, J. L. (1994). What is learned during automatization? The role of attention in constructing an instance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 10221050.
Marsden, E. (2006). Exploring input processing in the classroom: An experimental comparison of processing instruction and enriched input. Language Learning, 56, 507566.
Marsden, E., Altmann, G., & St. Clair, M. (in press). Priming of verb inflections in L2 French amongst beginner learners, and the effects of orientation of attention during different instructional activities. International Review of Applied Linguistics.
Marsden, E., & Chen, H.-Y. (2011). The roles of structured input activities in processing instruction and the kinds of knowledge they promote. Language Learning, 61, 10581098.
Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Ford, M., Older, L., & Zhou, X. (1996). The combinatorial lexicon: Priming derivational affixes. In Cottrell, G. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 223227). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 333.
McClelland, J., McNaughton, B., & O’Reilly, R. (1995). Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychological Review, 102, 419457.
Merkx, M., Rastle, K., & Davis, M. (2011). The acquisition of morphological knowledge investigated through artificial language learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 12001220.
Meunier, F., & Longtin, C. M. (2007). Morphological decomposition and semantic integration in word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 457471.
Neubauer, K., & Clahsen, H. (2009). Decomposition of inflected words in a second language: An experimental study of German participles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 403435.
Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417528.
Perruchet, P., & Vinter, A. (1998). PARSER: A model for word segmentation. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 246263.
Post, B., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Randall, B., & Tyler, L. K. (2008). The processing of English regular inflections: Phonological cues to morphological structure. Cognition, 109, 117.
Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 942971.
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 10901098.
Rebuschat, P. (in press). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge in language research. Language Learning.
Rebuschat, P., & Williams, J. N. (2006). Dissociating implicit and explicit learning of natural language syntax. In Sun, R. & Miyake, N. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (p. 2594). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Reid, A., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2000). Organising principles in lexical representation: Evidence from Polish. In Gleitman, L. & Joshi, A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 387392). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N. (1996). Word segmentation: The role of distributional cues. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 606621.
Sagarra, N. (2008). Working memory and L2 processing of redundant grammatical forms. In Han, Z.-H. (Ed.), Understanding second language process (pp. 133147). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Silva, R., & Clahsen, H. (2008). Morphologically complex words in L1 and L2 processing: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 245260.
Smolík, F. (2010). Inflectional suffix priming in Czech verbs and nouns. In Ohlsson, S. & Catrambone, R. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 16671672). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1976). Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 607620.
Toro, J. M., Sinnett, S., & Soto-Faraco, S. (2005). Speech segmentation by statistical learning depends on attention. Cognition, 97, B25B34.
Ullman, M. (2005). A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: The declarative/procedural model. In Sanz, C. (Ed.), Mind and context in adult second language acquisition: Methods, theory, and practice (pp. 141178). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
VanPatten, B. (1990). Attending to content and form in the input: An experiment in consciousness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 287301.
VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research. Westport, CT: Ablex.
VanPatten, B. (2002). Processing instruction: An update. Language Learning, 52, 755803.
VanPatten, B. (Ed.). (2004). Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
VanPatten, B. (2007). Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Williams, J. N. (2005). Learning without awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 269304.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed