Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

FACTORS INFLUENCING SENSITIVITY TO LEXICAL TONE IN AN ARTIFICIAL LANGUAGE: Implications for Second Language Learning

  • Catherine L. Caldwell-Harris (a1), Alia Lancaster (a2), D. Robert Ladd (a3), Dan Dediu (a4) and Morten H. Christiansen (a5)...

Abstract

This study examined whether musical training, ethnicity, and experience with a natural tone language influenced sensitivity to tone while listening to an artificial tone language. The language was designed with three tones, modeled after level-tone African languages. Participants listened to a 15-min random concatenation of six 3-syllable words. Sensitivity to tone was assessed using minimal pairs differing only in one syllable (nonword task: e.g., to-kà-su compared to ca-fí-to) or only in tone (tone task: e.g., to-kà-su compared to to-ká-su). Proficiency in an East Asian heritage language was the strongest predictor of success on the tone task. Asians without tone language experience were no better than other ethnic groups. We conclude by considering implications for research on second language learning, especially as approached through artificial language learning.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Catherine L. Caldwell-Harris, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, 02215. E-mail: charris@bu.edu

References

Hide All
Alexander, J. A., Wong, P. C. M., & Bradlow, A. R. (2005). Lexical tone perception in musicians and non-musicians. INTERSPEECH-2005, 397400. Retrieved from http://www.researchgate.net/publication/221484995_Lexical_tone_perception_in_musicians_and_non-musicians/file/e0b4951c9a69386504.pdf
Bent, T., Bradlow, A., & Wright, B. (2006). The influence of linguistic experience on the cognitive processing of pitch in speech and nonspeech sounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 97103.
Boersma, P. (2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5, 341345.
Bowers, J. S., Mattys, S. L., & Gage, S. H. (2009). Preserved implicit knowledge of a forgotten childhood language. Psychological Science, 20, 10641069.
Cacioppo, J., Petty, R., & Kao, C. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116131.
Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities: Their structure, growth, and action. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
Chobert, J., & Besson, M. (2013). Musical expertise and second language learning. Brain Sciences, 3, 923940.
Dediu, D., & Ladd, D. R. (2007). Linguistic tone is related to the population frequency of the adaptive haplogroups of two brain size genes, ASPM and Microcephalin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 104, 1094410949.
Deutsch, D., Henthorn, T., & Dolson, M. (2004). Absolute pitch, speech, and tone language: Some experiments and a proposed framework. Music Perception, 21, 339356.
Deutsch, D., Henthorn, T., Marvin, E., & Xu, H. G. (2006). Absolute pitch among American and Chinese conservatory students: Prevalence differences, and evidence for a speech-related critical period. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 719722.
Francis, A. L., Ciocca, V., Ma, L., & Fenn, K. (2008). Perceptual learning of Cantonese lexical tones by tone and non-tone language speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 268294.
Hove, M. J., Sutherland, M. E., & Krumhansl, C. L. (2010). Ethnicity effects in relative pitch learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 310316.
Hyman, L. M. (2009). How (not) to do a phonological typology: The case of pitch-accent. Language Sciences, 31, 213238.
Kempe, V., & Brooks, P. J. (2008). Second language learning of complex inflectional systems. Language Learning, 58, 703746.
Kempe, V., Brooks, P. J., & Kharkhurin, A. (2010). Cognitive predictors of generalization of Russian grammatical gender categories. Language Learning, 60, 127153.
Ladd, D. R., Turnbull, R., Browne, C., Caldwell-Harris, C. L., Ganushchak, L., Swoboda, K.Dediu, D. (2013). Patterns of individual differences in the perception of missing-fundamental tones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 13861397.
Lee, Y., Vakoch, D. A., & Wurm, L. G. (1996). Tone perception in Cantonese and Mandarin: A cross-linguistic comparison. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 527542.
Liu, Y., Wang, M., Perfetti, C. A., Brubaker, B., Wu, S., & MacWhinney, B. (2011). Learning a tonal language by attending to the tone: An in vivo experiment. Language Learning, 61, 11191141.
Mattock, K., & Burnham, D. (2006). Chinese and English infants’ tone perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization. Infancy, 10, 241265.
Mattock, K., Molnar, M., Polka, L., & Durnham, D. (2007). The developmental course of lexical tone in perception in the first year of life. Cognition, 106, 13671381.
Morett, L. M., & Chang, L.-Y. (2014). Emphasising sound and meaning: Pitch gestures enhance Mandarin lexical tone acquisition. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/23273798.2014.923105
Onnis, L., Monaghan, P., Richmond, K., & Chater, N. (2005). Phonology impacts segmentation in speech processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 225237.
Peña, M., Bonatti, L. L., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (2002). Signal-driven computations in speech processing. Science, 298, 604607.
Perrachione, T. K., Lee, J., Ha, L. Y., & Wong, P. C. (2011). Learning a novel phonological contrast depends on interactions between individual differences and training paradigm design. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130, 461472.
Saffran, J. R., Aslin, E., Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month old infants. Science, 274, 19261928.
Saffran, J. R., Johnson, E. K., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1999). Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults. Cognition, 70, 2752.
Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N. (1996). Word segmentation: The role of distributional cues. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 606621.
Schneider, P., Sluming, V., Roberts, N., Scherg, M., Goebel, R., Specht, H. J.,... Rupp, A. (2005). Structural and functional asymmetry of lateral Heschl’s gyrus reflects pitch perception preference. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 12411247.
Schön, D., & François, C. (2011). Musical expertise and statistical learning of musical and linguistic structures. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, Article 167.
So, C. K., & Best, C. T. (2011). Cross-language perception of non-native tonal contrasts: Effects of native phonological and phonetic influences. Language and Speech, 53, 273293.
Wang, T., & Saffran, J. R. (2014). Statistical learning of a tonal language: The influence of bilingualism and previous linguistic experience. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 953.
Wang, Y., Spence, M. M., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. A. (1999). Training American listeners to perceive Mandarin tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 36493658.
Wayland, R. P., & Guion, S. G. (2004). Training English and Chinese listeners to perceive Thai tones: A preliminary report. Language Learning, 54, 681712.
Wayland, R. P., & Li, B. (2008). Effects of two training procedures in cross-language perception of tones. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 250267.
Wong, P. C. M., Chandrasekaran, B., & Zheng, J. (2012). The derived allele of ASPM is associated with lexical tone perception. PLoS ONE, 7(4), Article e34243.
Wong, P. C. M., & Perrachione, T. K. (2007). Learning pitch patterns in lexical identification by native English-speaking adults. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 565585.
Yip, M. (2002). Tone. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

FACTORS INFLUENCING SENSITIVITY TO LEXICAL TONE IN AN ARTIFICIAL LANGUAGE: Implications for Second Language Learning

  • Catherine L. Caldwell-Harris (a1), Alia Lancaster (a2), D. Robert Ladd (a3), Dan Dediu (a4) and Morten H. Christiansen (a5)...

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed