Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

ANAPHORA RESOLUTION IN L2 ENGLISH: AN ANALYSIS OF DISCOURSE COMPLEXITY AND CROSS-LINGUISTIC INTERFERENCE

  • Carla Contemori (a1), Ohood Asiri (a2) and Elva Deida Perea Irigoyen (a3)

Abstract

We test the interpretation of pronominal forms in L2 speakers of English whose L1 is Spanish. Previous research on learners of nonnull subject languages has shown conflicting results. The aim of the present study is to reconcile previous evidence and shed light on the factors that determine learners’ difficulty to interpret pronominal forms in the L2. In six comprehension experiments, we found that intermediate L2 speakers did not show increased difficulty compared to native speakers in integrating multiple sources of information (syntactic, discourse, pragmatic) to resolve ambiguous pronouns in intrasentential anaphora and cataphora conditions. However, we also found that when two referents with equal prominence are introduced using a conjoined noun phrase in the preceding context, the learner’s performance is significantly different than the performance of the native speakers, both in intrasentential and intersentential anaphora. We suggest that L2 speakers may encounter difficulties evaluating the salience of the antecedents during pronoun resolution.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Carla Contemori, Department of Languages and Linguistics, University of Texas at El Paso, 500 W. University Ave, El Paso, Texas 79968. E-mail: carla.contemori@gmail.com

References

Hide All
Ariel, M. (1990). Accessing noun phrase antecedents . New York, NY: Routledge.
Arnold, J. (2010). How speakers refer: The role of accessibility. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4, 187203.
Arnold, J., & Griffin, Z. M. (2007). The effect of additional characters on choice of referring expression: Everyone counts. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 521536.
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255278.
Bates, D. M., & Sarkar, D. (2007). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.99875-6.
Baumann, P., Konieczny, L., & Hemforth, B. (2014). Conversational implicatures in anaphora resolution: Alternative constructions and referring expressions. In Hemforth, B., Mertins, B., & Fabricius-Hansen, C. (Eds.), Psycholinguistic approaches to meaning and understanding across languages (pp. 197212). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Belletti, A., Bennati, E., & Sorace, A. (2007). Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: Evidence from near-native Italian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 25, 657689.
Carminati, M. N. (2002). The processing of Italian subject pronouns (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
Chamorro, G. (2018). Offline interpretation of subject pronouns by native speakers of Spanish. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 3(1), 27. doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.256.
Contemori, C., & Dussias, G. (2015). Pronouns in L2 discourse: Evidence from eye-tracking and production. BUCLD 39 Online Proceedings Supplement. Retrieved from http://www.bu.edu/bucld/files/2015/06/Contemori.pdf
Contemori, C., & Dussias, G. (2016). Referential choice in a second language: Evidence for a listener-oriented approach. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31, 12571272.
Cunnings, I. (2017) Parsing and working memory in bilingual sentence processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20, 712721.
Cunnings, I., Fotiadou, G., & Tsimpli, I. (2017). Anaphora resolution and reanalysis during L2 sentence processing: Evidence from the visual world paradigm. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 621652.
Ellert, M. (2013). Resolving ambiguous pronouns in a second language: A visual-world eye-tracking study with Dutch learners of German. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 51, 171197.
Fernandes, E., Luegi, B., Soares, C., de la Fuente, I., & Hemforth, B. (2018). Adaptation in pronoun resolution: Evidence from Brazilian and European Portuguese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 44(12), 19862008. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000569.
Filiaci, F., Sorace, A., & Carreiras, M. (2014). Anaphoric biases of null and overt subjects in Italian and Spanish: A cross-linguistic comparison. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29, 825843.
Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434446.
Keating, G. D., Jegerski, J., & VanPatten, B. (2016). Online processing of subject pronouns in monolingual and heritage bilingual speakers of Mexican Spanish. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 3649.
Keating, G., VanPatten, B., & Jegerski, J. (2011). Who was walking on the beach: Anaphora resolution in Spanish heritage speakers and adult second language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 193221.
Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). The language experience and proficiency questionnaire (LEAP-Q). Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 940967.
Miltsakaki, E. (2002). Towards an aposynthesis of topic continuity and intrasentential anaphora. Computational Linguistics, 28, 319355.
Montrul, S., & Rodríguez Louro, C. (2006). Beyond the syntax of the null subject parameter. In Torrens, V. & Escobar, L. (Eds.), The acquisition of syntax in romance languages (pp. 401418). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.
Roberts, L., Gullberg, M., & Indefrey, P. (2008). Online pronoun resolution in L2 discourse: L1 influence and general learner effects. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 333357.
Rothman, J. (2008). How pragmatically odd! Interface delays and pronominal subject distribution in L2 Spanish. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 1, 317339.
Schimke, S., & Colonna, S. (2016). Native and non-native interpretation of pronominal forms: Evidence from French and Turkish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 131162.
Serratrice, L. (2007). Cross-linguistic influence in the interpretation of anaphoric and cataphoric pronouns in English–Italian bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 225238.
Shin, N. L., & Cairns, H. S. (2009). Subject pronouns in child Spanish and continuity of reference. In Collentine, J., García, M., Lafford, B., & Marín, F. M. (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 11th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 155164). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Silva-Corvalán, C. (1994). Language contact and change: Spanish in Los Angeles . Oxford. UK: Oxford University Press.
Sorace, A. (2011). Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 133.
Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F. (2006). Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research, 22, 339368.
Sorace, A., Serratrice, L., Filiaci, F., & Baldo, M. (2009). Discourse conditions on subject pronoun realization: Testing the linguistic intuitions of older bilingual children. Lingua, 119, 460477.
Sturt, P. (2003). The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 542562.
Trnavac, R., & Taboada, M. (2016) Cataphora, backgrounding and accessibility in discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 93, 6884.
Van Gompel, R. P. G., & Liversedge, S. P. (2003). The influence of morphological information on cataphoric pronoun assignment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 128139.
Vogels, J., Krahmer, E., & Maes, A. (2014). How cognitive load influences speakers’ choice of referring expressions. Cognitive Science, 39, 13961418.
Wilson, F. (2009). Processing at the Syntax-Discourse Interface in Second Language Acquisition(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Edinburgh, UK: University of Edinburgh.

ANAPHORA RESOLUTION IN L2 ENGLISH: AN ANALYSIS OF DISCOURSE COMPLEXITY AND CROSS-LINGUISTIC INTERFERENCE

  • Carla Contemori (a1), Ohood Asiri (a2) and Elva Deida Perea Irigoyen (a3)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed