No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Archbishop Tait, The Huguenots and the French Church at Canterbury
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 January 2016
Extract
Archibald Campbell Tait was enthroned as archbishop of Canterbury in February 1869. It was an inauspicious time to assume the primacy of the Church of England, which was riven by internal conflicts and religious differences. Furthermore, Gladstone had recently swept to power with the support of the Nonconformists. The new prime minister had a mandate to disestablish the Irish church and his political supporters sought to challenge the privileges and status of the Church of England. As primate, Tait attempted to defend the Church of England as the established church and restrict those parties that held particularly narrow and dogmatic beliefs, regardless of whether they were Evangelicals or Ritualists. The archbishop strove to straddle these religious differences and to achieve his aims through a policy of compromise and tolerance, but some of his actions served to cause further divisions within the Anglican church. Tait’s efforts to restrict elaborate ceremonial and services through the Public Worship Regulation Act (1874) alienated the Ritualists, for example. Many more clergy were opposed to his concessions to Nonconformists in the Burials Bill (1877), which would have allowed them to be interred in parish churchyards. Amidst the wider religious tensions and political conflicts that marked his primacy, the archbishop also took a close interest in the French Protestant Church at Canterbury, whose history he regarded as reflecting some important attributes of the Church of England, its past, and its current status in the world.
- Type
- Part I: The Churches’ Use of the Past
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Ecclesiastical History Society 2013
References
1 Chadwick, O., The Victorian Church, 2 vols (London, 1970)Google Scholar, vol. 2; Crowther, M.A., Church Embattled: Religious Controversy in Mid-Victorian England (Newton Abbot, 1970), 13–39 Google Scholar; Machin, G. I. T., Politics and the Churches in Great Britain 1869 to 1921 (Oxford, 1987)Google Scholar; Marsh, P. T., ‘The Primate and the Prime Minister: Archbishop Tait, Gladstone and the National Church’, Victorian Studies 9 (1965), 113–40 Google Scholar; idem, The Victorian Church in Decline: Archbishop Tait and the Church of England 1868–1882 (London, 1969); Parry, J. P., ‘Religion and the Collapse of Gladstone’s First Government, 1870–1874’, HistJ 25 (1982), 71–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Hansard’s Parliamentary Debates (ser. 3), vol. 158, col. 125, 26 April 1860.
3 The Times, 5 February 1869.
4 Tait, A. C., The Present Position of the Church of England (London, 1873), 16.Google Scholar
5 Tait, A. C., The Church of the Future (London, 1880), 10.Google Scholar
6 See Spicer, A., ‘1885: French Protestantism and Huguenot Identity in Victorian Britain’, in Benedict, P., Daussy, H. and Léchot, P.-O., eds, Histoire, mémoire et identités en mutation: Les huguenots en France et en diaspora (XVIe–XXIe siécles) (Geneva, forthcoming).Google Scholar
7 Gwynn, R., ‘Patterns in the Study of Huguenot Refugees in Britain: Past, Present and Future’, in Scouloudi, I., ed., Huguenots in Britain and their French Background, 1550–1800 (Basingstoke, 1987), 217–35, at 225, 233–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Murdoch, Tessa, The Quiet Conquest: The Huguenots 1685–1985 (London, 1985), 313–15.Google Scholar
8 Marmoy, C. F. A., ‘The Historical Novel and the Huguenots’, Proceedings of the Huguenot Society 23 (1977-82), 69–78 Google Scholar; Spicer, ‘1885’.
9 [Craik, Dinah Maria], ‘A Brave Lady’, Macmillan’s Magazine, February 1870, 294–7; eadem, A Brave Lady (London, 1870), 256–8, 261 Google Scholar; see also Spicer, A., ‘Victorian Vignettes of the French Church at Canterbury’, Proceedings of the Huguenot Society 29 (2008-12), 716–18.Google Scholar
10 Spicer, ‘1885’.
11 Burn, J. S., The History of the French, Walloon, Dutch and other Foreign Protestant Refugees (London, 1846).Google Scholar
12 Weiss, C., Histoire des réfugiés protestants de France depuis la révocation de l’Édit de Nantes jusqu’à nos jours, 2 vols (Paris, 1853)Google Scholar; idem, A History of the French Protestant Refugees from the Edict of Nantes to our own days (Edinburgh, 1854). A separate American translation was published in New York in 1854.
13 Smiles, S., Les huguenots: Leurs colonies, leurs industries, leurs églises en Angleterre (Paris, 1870).Google Scholar In the preface, the translator Athanase-Laurent-Charles Cocquerel emphasized the importance of the links between the two nations as well as the memory of the persecution of the Huguenots and ‘the warm fellowship of English brothers’: ibid. vi-vii.
14 Smiles, S., The Huguenots: Their Settlements, Churches and Industries in England and Ireland (London, 1867), vii.Google Scholar
15 Burn, History, 38–53; Hasted, Edward, The History and Topographical Survey of the County of Kent, 12 vols (Canterbury, 1797-1801), 11: 91–8 Google Scholar; ODNB, s.n. ‘Burn, John Southerden (1798–1870)’.
16 Smiles, S., ‘The French Church in Canterbury Cathedral’, Good Words 7 (April 1866), 253–8 Google Scholar; idem, Huguenots, 120–7.
17 Martin, J. A., Christian Firmness of the Huguenots and A Sketch of the History of the French Refugee Church of Canterbury (Canterbury, 1881), 35–40 Google Scholar; Cross, F. W., A History of the Walloon and Huguenot Church at Canterbury, Huguenot Society Quarto Series 15 (London, 1898), 3–10.Google Scholar
18 Canterbury, French Church, ‘Actes du Consistoire de l’Eglise Française de Canterbury. 18 Février 1877 – 13 September [sic] 1946’, 99. I am grateful to the consistory of the French Church in Canterbury and Michael Peters for making these records available to me. See Oakley, A. M., ‘The Canterbury Walloon Congregation from Elizabeth I to Laud’, in Scouloudi, , ed., Huguenots in Britain, 56–71, at 56–9.Google Scholar
19 Martin, Christian Firmness, 95.
20 Ibid. 87–9; see also Nockles, P. B., ‘Aspects of Cathedral Life, 1828–98’, in Collinson, P., Ramsay, N. and Sparks, M., eds, A History of Canterbury Cathedral (Canterbury, 2002), 256–96, at 276–8Google Scholar; Spicer, A., ‘“A Survival of a Distant Past”: J. A. Martin and the Victorian Revival of the French Church at Canterbury’, Southern History 34 (2012), 101–39.Google Scholar
21 Canterbury, French Church, ‘Livre des comptes de l’église Française Wallonnes de Cantorbery’, 19 May 1870.
22 London, LPL, Tait Papers, vol. 217, fols 373r-376v, Charity Commissioners to Robert Payne Smith, 7 April 1876.
23 Tait Papers, vol. 206, fols 374r-375r, Charity Commissioners to Tait, 30 July 1875.
24 Hansard’s Parliamentary Debates (ser. 3), vol. 226, col. 726, 9 August 1875.
25 Ibid., col. 727.
26 Davidson, R. T. and Benham, W., Life of Archibald Campbell Tait, 2 vols (London, 1891), 2: 315.Google Scholar
27 The Times, 13 August 1875.
28 Tait Papers, vol. 206, fols 379r-380v, William Chastel de Boinville to Tait, 11 August 1875.
29 Martin, Christian Firmness, 130–1.
30 Tait Papers, vol. 280, fols 232r-233r, Charity Commissioners to Tait, 1 February 1882; ibid., fols 236r-237v, Robert Payne-Smith to Tait, 23 February 1882; The Times, 18 January 1883.
31 LPL, Benson Papers, vol. 55, fols 361r-366v, Robert Payne Smith to Archbishop Benson, 30 November 1887.
32 Ibid., fols 367r-368v, Benson to Charity Commissioners, 1887.
33 Ibid., fols 378r-382v, Charity Commissioners Report, 1888.
34 Hansard’s Parliamentary Debates (ser. 3), vol. 226, cols 725–7, 9 August 1875.
35 Tait, A. C., Some Thoughts on the Duties of the Established Church of England as a National Church (London, 1876), 5–6.Google Scholar
36 Tait Papers, vol. 206, fols 379r-380v, William Chastel de Boinville to Tait, 11 August 1875.
37 Smiles, Huguenots, 127.
38 Tait Papers, vol. 216, fols 138r-140r, Joseph Martin to Tait, 10 July 1876.
39 These anniversaries only appear in the consistory minutes after Martin had become pastor.
40 Martin, Christian Firmness, 98.
41 Spicer, A., ‘“A Place of refuge and sanctuary of a holy Temple”: Exile Communities and the Stranger Churches’, in Goose, N. and Luu, L., eds, Immigrants in Tudor and Early Stuart England (Brighton, 2005), 91–109 Google Scholar, at 93–4, 98–9, 104; Burn, History, 24–7.
42 Martin, Christian Firmness, 133.
43 Spicer, ‘“Place of refuge”’, 94–6; The Minute Book of the French Church at Southampton, 1702–1939, ed. Welch, E., Southampton Records Series 23 (Southampton, 1979), 9, 124–55.Google Scholar
44 Hansard’s Parliamentary Debates (ser. 3), vol. 226, col. 726, 9 August 1875.
45 Tait, Present Position, 14; Tait, Church of the Future, 170–1.
46 Hansard’s Parliamentary Debates (ser. 3), vol. 158, cols 1639–40, 24 May 1860; Prothero, R. E., The Life and Correspondence of Arthur Penrhyn Stanley, 2 vols (n.pl., 1893), 1: 428 Google Scholar; Anon, ., A Handbook for Travellers in Kent and Sussex (London, 1858), 177 Google Scholar; King, R. J., Handbook to the Cathedrals of England: Southern Division (London, 1861), 385.Google Scholar
47 The Standard, 29 May 1878; Morning Post, 31 May 1878; Manchester Guardian, 1 June 1878.
48 Agatha Ramm, ‘Granville’, in Wilson, Keith M., ed., British Foreign Secretaries and Foreign Policy; From Crimean War to First World War (London, 1987), 94 Google Scholar; Coutain, Bryan, ‘The Unconditional Most-Favoured-Nation Clause and the Maintenance of the Liberal Trade Regime in the Postwar 1870s’, International Organization 63 (2009), 139–75 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Nockles, ‘Cathedral Life’, 282–3. When the restored chapter house was opened by the Prince of Wales in May 1897, it marked the 1300th anniversary of St Augustine’s mission: Morning Post, 31 May 1897.
49 Tait, Some Thoughts, 4.
50 Tait, Church of the Future, 2–3; Norwood, P. V., ‘A Victorian Primate’, ChH 14 (1945), 3–16, at 15–16.Google Scholar
51 Tait, Some Thoughts, 6–7.
52 Tait, Church of the Future, 12.
53 Hansard’s Parliamentary Debates (ser. 3), vol. 158, col. 125, 26 April 1860. Although the French Reformed Church and the German Lutheran Church represented different religious confessions, the latter had been established according to the same terms outlined in the letters patent granted in 1550 to the Reformed congregations in London: see A. Spicer, ‘Lutheran Churches and Confessional Identity’, in idem, ed., Lutheran Churches in Early Modern Europe (Farnham, 2012), 1–15, at 5–8; Steinmetz, S., Deutsche Evangelisch-Lutherische St.-Marien-Kirche London / St Mary’s German Lutheran Church London, 1694–1994 (London, 1994).Google Scholar
54 Tait, Church of the Future, 12–13.
55 Tait Papers, vol. 217, fols 363r-364v, Ministers of the French Reformed Church to Tait, 6 May 1876.
56 Ibid., fol. 367r-v, Tait to ministers of the French Reformed Church, 30 May 1876.
57 Tait Papers, vol. 280, fol. 234r-v, Tait to Charity Commissioners, 4 February 1882.
58 Pall Mall Gazette, 13 June 1876; Manchester Guardian, 14 June 1876; Blackburn Standard and North East Lancashire Advertiser, 17 June 1876.
59 Tait, , Church of the Future, 10–11, 40–1, 208; Davidson, and Benham, , Life of Tait, 2: 514–15.Google Scholar
60 ‘Free Churches in France. Sketches of Worship and Life’, The Congregationalist 3 (1874), 305–9; ‘The French Reformed Church’, The Congregationalist 5 (1876), 27–32; Johnson, D., ‘L’attitude des protestants britanniques aux débuts de la Troisième République’, in Encrevé, A. and Richard, M., eds, Les protestants dans les débuts de la Troisième République (1871–1885) (Paris, 1979), 491–534.Google Scholar
61 ‘English Churchmen on the Continent’, CQR 5 (1877), 371. Socinianism is the rejection of the doctrines of the Trinity and divinity of Christ.
62 Tait, Some Thoughts, 3–4, 98–100. See Marsh, , ‘Primate and Prime Minister’, 113–40; idem, Victorian Church, 94–7.Google Scholar
63 Tait, Church of the Future, 17.
64 Marsh, Victorian Church, 245–51.
65 ‘I discover with satisfaction that the two most illustrious Canons of Canterbury were, one a layman, the other a minister of the Dutch Church – Casaubon and Saravin [sic]; and that Arnold’s much-abused theory of having different sects worship in the same church is here fulfilled even to exaggeration, inasmuch as a Presbyterian service is carried out in the Crypt at the same hour as the Cathedral service above’: Prodiero, Life and Correspondence, 428.
66 Tait Papers, vol. 216, fol. 138r, Joseph Martin to Tait, 10 July 1876.
67 ‘Is the Church of England Protestant?’, CQR 7 (1879), 261–304, at 277.
68 The Times, 22 February 1895.
69 Tait Papers, vol. 216, fols 131r-133v, ‘E. D.’ [Edward Parry, Bishop of Dover?] to ‘C.’ [Crauford Tait?], 21 June 1876; Nockles, ‘Cathedral Life’, 277.
70 Hook, W. F., Lives of the Archbishops of Canterbury, 12 vols (London, 1860-76), 11: 254–6 Google Scholar; Lang, Timothy, The Victorians and the Stuart Heritage: Interpretations of a Discordant Past (Cambridge, 1995), 158–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
71 ODNB, s.n. ‘Tait, Archibald Campbell (1811–1882)’; ‘Charles Lowder’, CQR 14 (1882), 57–68, at 62.
72 Hansard’s Parliamentary Debates (ser. 3), vol. 158, col. 1640, 24 May 1860.