Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Mental Associations Between Law and Competitiveness: a Cross-Cultural Investigation

  • Pilar Aguilar (a1), Mitchell J. Callan (a2) and Rael J. Dawtry (a3)

Abstract

Previous research suggests that individuals from countries that adopt an adversarial legal system, such as Canada or United Kingdom, mentally associate “law” more strongly with concepts related to competition than concepts related to cooperation. We examined whether people from a country with a non-adversarial legal system show similar mental associations. Participants from Spain and the UK completed a Single-Category Implicit Association Test. Spanish participants mentally associated the law with competition less strongly than participants from the UK (the average D-score was significantly greater than zero in the predicted direction, t(189) = 8.16, p < .001; d=1.18). Exploratory analysis also suggested that this difference between the countries was stronger among participants who believed that the method of legal practice in their own country was more adversarial. Moreover, perceiving the legal system as adversarial predicted automatic associations between law and competition for UK but not for Spanish participants. These findings suggest that legal system plays a relevant role in shaping not only individuals’ actions, but their cognitive processes.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Mental Associations Between Law and Competitiveness: a Cross-Cultural Investigation
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Mental Associations Between Law and Competitiveness: a Cross-Cultural Investigation
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Mental Associations Between Law and Competitiveness: a Cross-Cultural Investigation
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Pilar Aguilar. Psychology Department. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. C/ Ivan Paulov, 6. 28049. Madrid (Spain). E-mail: pilar.aguilar@uam.es

References

Hide All
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Asimow, M. (2007). Popular culture and the adversary system. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 40, 651683.
Bailis, D. S., & MacCoun, R. J. (1996). Estimating liability risks with the media as your guide: A content analysis of media coverage of tort litigation. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 419429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01498978
Bar-Gill, O., & Fershtam, C. (2004). Law and preferences. The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 20, 331352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewh036
Berrey, E., Hoffman, S. G., & Nielsen, L. B. (2012). Situated justice: A contextual analysis of fairness and inequality in employment discrimination litigation. Law and Society Review, 46, 136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2012.00471.x
Callan, M. J., Kay, A. C., Olson, J. M., Brar, N., & Whitefield, N. (2010). The effects of priming legal concepts on perceived trust and competitiveness, self-interested attitudes, and competitive behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 325335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.005
Callan, M. J., & Kay, A. C. (2012). Associations between law, competitiveness, and the pursuit of self-interest. In Hanson, J. D. (Ed.), Ideology, Psychology, and Law (pp. 183218). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199737512.003.0007
Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (2011). Barómetro de febrero [February report] CIS Study no. 2861. Madrid, Spain. Retrieved from www.cis.es/cis/opencm/ES/1_encuestas/estudios/ver.jsp?estudio=10804
Clark, M. S., Ouellette, R., Powell, M. C., & Milberg, S. (1987). Recipient’s mood, relationship type, and helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 94103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.94
Cohn, E. S., & White, S. O. (1990). Legal socialization: A study of norms and rules. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3378-7
Ewik, P., & Sibley, S., , S. (1998). The Common place of law: Stories from everyday life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Glenn, H. P. (2004). Legal traditions of the world: Sustainable diversity in law, (2 nd Ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 14641480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197
Inquisitorial system (n.d.). In The Free Dictionary. Retrieved from http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Inquisitorial+System
Karpinski, A., & Steinman, R. B. (2006). The single category Implicit Association Test as a measure of implicit social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1632. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.16
Kysar, D. A. (2012). “You call, I hammer!”: Adversarial legalism and social influence. In Hanson, J. D. (Ed.). Ideology, Psychology, and Law (pp. 219227). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199737512.003.0008
Levine, T. R., & McCornack, S. A. (1991). The dark side of trust: Conceptualizing and measuring types of communicative suspicion. Communication Quarterly, 39, 325340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01463379109369809
Markus, H. R., & Hamedani, M. G. (2007). Sociocultural psychology: The dynamic interdependence among self systems and social systems. In Kitayama, S. & Cohen, D. (Eds.), Handbook of Cultural Psychology (pp. 339). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Nielsen, L. B. (2000). Situating legal consciousness: Experiences and attitudes of ordinary citizens about law and street harassment. Law & Society Review, 34, 10551090. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3115131
Nosek, B. A., Cunningham, W. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2000). Measuring implicit attitudes on the Internet. Nashville, TN: Society for Personality and Social Psychology.
O’Conner, S. D. (1999). Professionalism. Oregon Law Review, 78, 385391.
Roberson, C., & Das, D. K. (2008). An introduction to comparative legal models of criminal justice. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Sarat, A., & Kearns, T. R. (1995). Law in everyday life. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Silbey, S. S. (2005). After legal consciousness. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 1, 323368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.1.041604.115938
Silbey, S. S., & Cavicchi, A. (2005). The common place of law: Transforming matters of concern into the objects of everyday life. In Latour, B. & Weibel, P. (Eds.), Making things public: Atmospheres of democracy (pp. 556563). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NY:. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1978). A theory of procedure. California Law Review, 66, 541566. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3480099
Uskul, A. K., Kitayama, S., & Nisbett, R. E. (2008). Ecocultural basis of cognition: Farmers and fishermen are more holistic than herders. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 105, 85528556. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803874105
Van Lange, P. A. M., Otten, W., De Bruin, E. M. N., & Joireman, J. A. (1997). Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 733746. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.733

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed