Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T19:29:34.037Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On Ambivalence and Risk: Reflexive Modernity and the New Human Genetics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2000

Anne Kerr
Affiliation:
Science Studies Unit, University of Edinburgh, 21 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LN, UK
Sarah Cunningham-Burley
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK
Get access

Abstract

This critical examination of theories of reflexive modernity with respect to the new human genetics draws on a range of empirical studies and conceptual critiques. In it we explore the ways in which genetic knowledge and testing technologies offer new choices, construct new risks and generate public and professional ambivalence. We contrast this with the processes of ordering, reduction and control suffusing these developments. We argue that reductionism and determinism continue to infuse genetic theories and methods, that scientific and social progress are collapsed anew, and that certitude and surveillance remain powerful guiding principles. Within this context, the reflexive potential of individual choice, personal responsibility and risk estimation is seriously undermined. Indeed, in the case of the new human genetics, it seems that reflexive modernisation promotes, rather than curtails, a new modern/counter-modern eugenics. This occurs through the privatisation of lay ambivalence and professionals' successful institutional reflexivity. The paper concludes with a consideration of the implications of our reflections for sociology and participatory democracy more broadly.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2000 BSA Publications Ltd

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)