Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T11:10:08.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Wrong Poster Child for Legislative Paralysis: Salvador Allende and Legislative Output in Chile, 1932–1973

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2022

Patricio Navia*
Affiliation:
Political Science, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile
Rodrigo Osorio
Affiliation:
Political Science, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile
*
*Email: pdn200@nyu.edu

Abstract

Conflicts resulting from the dual legitimacy problem of presidential systems (where the president and the legislature are elected by different majorities) sometimes result in legislative gridlock – a point made by those who criticize the alleged perils of presidentialism. The socialist government of Salvador Allende (1970–73), that ended with the breakdown of democracy, is often used as a poster child for legislative gridlock. With information on the 23,798 bills and 12,809 laws enacted in Chile between 1932 and 1973, we compare the passage of legislation in eight presidential terms and demonstrate that not to be the case. Legislative output showed an upward trend after the 1943 constitutional reform but was on a downward trend since the mid-1960s, before the 1970 constitutional reform restricted the scope of bills that legislators could introduce. Under Allende, while 1653 bills were introduced (438 of which were presidential bills), 642 laws were passed (38.8% and 68.2%, respectively) – compared to 53.8% and 39.9% for all presidents in the period, respectively. The evidence does not justify the claim that there was legislative gridlock under Allende. Instead, variations in legislative output across presidential terms in Chile can be explained by changes in the rules of the legislative process.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Social Science History Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, Bruce (2000) “The new separation of powers.” Harvard Law Review 113: 642727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agor, Weston H. (1973) El Senado Chileno. Distribución Interna de la Influencia. Santiago: Editorial Andrés Bello.Google Scholar
Aleman, Eduardo, and Calvo, Ernesto (2008) “Analyzing legislative success in Latin America: The case of democratic Argentina,” in O’Donnell, Guillermo, Tulchin, Joseph H., and Varas, Augusto (eds.) New Voices in the Study of Democracy in Latin America. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars: 738.Google Scholar
Alemán, Eduardo, and Calvo, Ernesto (2010) “Unified government, bill approval, and the legislative weight of the president.” Comparative Political Studies 43 (4): 511–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alemán, Eduardo, and Tsebelis, George (2005) “The origins of presidential conditional agenda-setting power in Latin America.” Latin American Research Review 40 (2): 326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alemán, Eduardo, and Tsebelis, George (2016) Legislative Institutions and Lawmaking in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amorim Neto, Octavio, Cox, Gary W., and Mccubbins, Mathew D. (2003) “Agenda power in Brazil’s Camara dos Deputados, 1998–98.” World Politics 55: 550–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, Andrew W, and Eshbaugh-Soha, Matthew (2007) “Presidential success on the substance of legislation.” Political Research Quarterly 60 (1): 100–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermeo, Nancy (2003) Ordinary People in Extraordinary Times: The Citizenry and the Breakdown of Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borzutsky, Silvia (2002) Vital Connections. Politics, Social Security and Inequality in Chile. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Canes-Wrone, Brandice, and de Marchi, Scott (2002) “Presidential approval and legislative success.” Journal of Politics 64 (2): 491509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, John M. (2008) “Presidential versus parliamentary government,” in Ménard, Claude, and Shirley, Mary. M. (eds.) Handbook of new Institutional Economics. Berlin: Springer: 91122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chasquetti, Daniel (2011) “El secreto del éxito: presidentes y cárteles legislativos en Uruguay (1995–2010).” Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política 20 (1): 931.Google Scholar
Cheibub, José Antonio (2007) Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cheibub, José Antonio, Przeworski, Adam, and Saiegh, Sebastián (2004) “Government coalitions and legislative success under presidentialism and parliamentarism.” British Journal of Political Science 34 (4): 656–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Youssef (1994) Radicals, Reformers and Reactionaries. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth B., and Collier, David (1991) Shaping the Political Arena. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Collier, Simon, and Sater, William F. (1996) A History of Chile, 1808–1994. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Colomer, Josep M. (2006) “Comparative constitutions,” in Binder, Sarah A., Rhodes, R.A.W., and Rockman, Bert A. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions. New York: Oxford University Press: 217–38.Google Scholar
Correa Sutil, Sofía (2005) Con las riendas del poder. La derecha chilena en el siglo XX. Santiago: Editorial Sudamericana.Google Scholar
Correa Sutil, Sofía, Figueroa, Consuelo, Jocelyn-Holt, Alfredo, Rolle, Claudio, and Vicuña, Manuel (2001) Historia del Siglo XX Chileno. Santiago: Sudamericana.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D. (2005) Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the US House of Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and Morgenstern, Scott (2001) “Latin America’s reactive assemblies and proactive presidents.” Comparative Politics 32 (2): 171–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruz Coke, Ricardo (1984) Historia electoral de Chile. 1925–1973. Santiago: Editorial Jurídica de Chile.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. (1971) Polyarchy. Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
De Vylder, Stefan (1976) Allende’s Chile: The Political Economy of the Rise and Fall of the Unidad Popular. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Diermeier, Daniel, and Vlaicu, Razvan (2011) “Executive control and legislative success.” The Review of Economic Studies 78 (3): 846–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elgie, Robert (2005) “From Linz to Tsebelis: Three waves of presidential/parliamentary studies?Democratization 12 (1): 106–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faúndez, Julio (1997) “In defense of presidentialism: The case of Chile, 1932–1970,” in Mainwaring, Scott, and Shugart, Matthew S. (eds.) Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 300–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faúndez, Julio (2007) Democratization, Development, and Legality: Chile, 1831–1973. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fermandois Vöhringer, Arturo, and García, José Francisco (2009) “Origen del presidencialismo chileno: Reforma constitucional de 1970, ideas matrices e iniciativa legislativa exclusiva.” Revista chilena de derecho 36 (2): 281311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figueiredo, Angelina C., and Limongi, Fernando (2000) “Presidential power, legislative organization, and party behavior in Brazil.” Comparative Politics 32 (2): 151–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleet, Michael (1985) The Rise and Fall of Chilean Christian Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcés, Mario (2020) La Unidad Popular y la revolución en Chile. Santiago: LOM.Google Scholar
Gazmuri, Cristian (2000) Eduardo Frei Montalva y su época. Santiago: Aguilar.Google Scholar
Gerring, John, Thacker, Strom C., and Moreno, Carola (2009) “Are parliamentary systems better?Comparative Political Studies 42 (3): 327–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gil, Federico (1966) The Political System of Chile. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Peter A. (1975) “The Politics of the Allende Overthrow in Chile.” Political Science Quarterly 90 (1): 93116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobsbawn, Eric (1973) “The murder of Chile.” New Society, September 20.Google Scholar
Joignant, Alfredo, and Navai, Patricio, eds. (2013) Ecos mundiales del golpe de Estado. Escritos sobre el 11 de septiembre de 1973. Santiago: Ediciones Universidad Diego Portales.Google Scholar
Jones, Mark P. (1995) Electoral Laws and the Survival of Presidential Democracies. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
Kay, Cristobal (1975) “Chile: The making of a coup d’état.” Science & Society 18 (1): 325.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney (1994) Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith (1996) “Institutional and partisan sources of gridlock: A theory of divided and unified government.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 8 (1): 740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, Juan J. (1990) “The Perils of Presidentialism.” Journal of Democracy 1 (1): 5169.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J. (1994) “Presidential or parliamentary democracy: Does it make a difference?,” in Linz, Juan J., and Valenzuela, Arturo (eds.) The Failure of Presidential Democracy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press: 387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, Juan J., and Stepan, Alfred (1996) Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockerbie, Brad, Borrelli, Stephan, and Hedger, Scott (1998) “An integrative approach to modeling presidential success in congress.” Political Research Quarterly 51 (1): 155–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loveman, Brian (1976) Struggle in the Countryside: Politics and Rural Labor in Chile, 1919–1973. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott (2003) “Presidentialism, multipartism and democracy: The difficult combination,” in Dahl, Robert A., Shapiro, Ian, and Cheibub, José A. (eds.) The Democracy Sourcebook. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 198228.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Scully, Timothy R. (1995) “Introduction: party systems in Latin America,” in Mainwaring, Scott, and Scully, Timothy R. (eds.) Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford: Stanford University Press: 134.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Shugart, Matthew S., eds. (1997) Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meléndez Ávila, Felipe (2020) “Las variaciones del régimen presidencial chileno durante la vigencia de la Constitución de 1925.” Revista de Estudios Histórico Jurídicos XLII: 579601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miliband, Ralph (1973) “The coup in Chile.” Socialist Register 10 (10): 451–74.Google Scholar
Molina, Sergio (1970) “La planificación y la iniciativa exclusiva del Ejecutivo en materia económica y social,” in Frei, Eduardo, Molina, Sergio, Evans, Enrique, Lagos, Gustavo, Silva, Alejandro, and Cumplido, Francisco (eds.) La reforma constitucional de 1970. Santiago: Editorial Jurídica de Chile: 7490.Google Scholar
Navai, Patricio, and Osorio, Rodrigo (2015) “Las encuestas de opinión pública en Chile antes de 1973.” Latin American Research Review 50 (1): 117–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarrete, Bernardo (2002) El caso de la Democracia Cristiana Chilena, 1941–2001. Santiago: CEGADES.Google Scholar
Negretto, Gabriel L. (2006) “Minority presidents and democratic performance in Latin America.” Latin American Politics and Society 48 (3): 6392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palanza, Valeria (2018) Checking Presidential Power: Executive Decrees and the Legislative Process in New Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Palanza, Valeria, and Sin, Gisela (2014) “Veto bargaining and the legislative process in multiparty presidential systems.” Comparative Political Studies 47 (5): 766–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parrish, Charles J., von Lazar, Arpad J., and Tapia Videla, Jorge (1967) The Chilean Congressional Election of March 7, 1965: An Analysis. Washington, DC: Institute for the Comparative Study of Political Systems.Google Scholar
Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal (2003) “Pugna de poderes y crisis de gobernabilidad:¿ hacia un nuevo presidencialismo?Latin American Research Review 38 (3): 149–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal (2007) Presidential Impeachment and the New Political Instability in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petras, James, and Morley, Morris (1975) The United States and Chile. Imperialism and the Overthrow of the Allende Government. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, ed. (1995) Sustainable Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raile, Eric D, Pereira, Carlos, and Power, Timothy J. (2011) “The executive toolbox: Building legislative support in a multiparty presidential regime.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (2): 323–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, Thomas, and Rosenthal, Howard (1978) “Political resource allocation, control agendas and the status quo.” Public Choice 33: 2744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roxborough, Ian, O’Brien, Philip, and Roddick, Jackie (1977) Chile, the State and Revolution. London: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saiegh, Sebastián M. (2011) Ruling by Statute: How Uncertainty and Vote Buying Shape Lawmaking. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saiegh, Sebastián M. (2009) “Political prowess or ‘Lady Luck’? Evaluating chief executives’ legislative success rates.” The Journal of Politics 71 (4): 1342–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salazar, Gabriel, and Pinto, Julio (1999) Historia Contemporánea de Chile I. Estado, legitimidad, ciudadanía. Santiago: LOM.Google Scholar
Santos, Manoel Leonardo, Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal, and García Montero, Mercedes (2014) “El control presidencial de la agenda legislativa en América Latina.” Revista de ciencia política (Santiago) 34 (3): 511–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni (2005) Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Colchester: ECPR press.Google Scholar
Scott, Robert E. (1958) “Legislatures and legislation,” in Eugene Davis, Harold (ed.) Government and Politics in Latin America. New York: The Ronald Press Company: 290332.Google Scholar
Shugart, Matthew S., and Carey, John M. (1992) Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siavelis, Peter (2000) The President and Congress in Post-Authoritarian Chile: Institutional Constraints to Democratic Consolidation. Philadelphia: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Siavelis, Peter (2009) “Executive-legislative relations and democracy in Latin America,” in Millet, Richard L, Holmes, Jennifer S, and Pérez, Orlando J. (eds.) Latin American Democracy: Emerging Reality of Endangered Species. New York: Routledge: 101–18.Google Scholar
Silva Bascuñán, Alejandro (1970) “El nuevo régimen de iniciativa exclusiva del Ejecutivo,” in Frei, Eduardo, Molina, Sergio, Evans, Enrique, Lagos, Gustavo, Silva, Alejandro, and Cumplido, Francisco (eds.) La reforma constitucional de 1970. Santiago: Editorial Jurídica de Chile: 89107.Google Scholar
Soto Velasco, Sebastián (2015) Congreso legislativo y proceso legislativo Teoría y práctica. Santiago: Thompson Reuters.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Terry, and de Marchi, Scott (2011) “Congressional bargaining in presidential time: Give and take, anticipation, and the constitutional rationalization of dead ducks.” The Journal of Politics 73 (3): 748–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tapia-Videla, Jorge (1977) “The Chilean presidency in a developmental perspective.” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 19 (4): 451–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tapia-Videla, Jorge (1960) La técnica legislativa. Santiago: Editorial Jurídica de Chile.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George (2002) Veto Players How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valenzuela, Arturo (1977) Political Brokers in Chile: Local Government in a Centralized Polity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Arturo (1978) The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Chile. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Arturo (1994) “Party politics and the crisis of presidentialism in Chile: A proposal for a parliamentary form of government,” in Linz, Juan J., and Valenzuela, Arturo (eds.) The Failure of Presidential Democracy: The Case of Latin America. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press: 91150.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Arturo (2004) “Latin American presidencies interrupted.” Journal of Democracy 15 (4): 519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valenzuela, Arturo, and Wilde, Alexander (1979) “Presidential politics and the decline of the Chilean Congress,” in Smith, Joel, and Musolf, Lloyed (eds.) Legislatures in Development: Dynamics of Change in New and Old States. Durham, NC: Duke University Press: 189215.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, J. Samuel (1995) “Orígenes y transformaciones del sistema de partidos en Chile.” Estudios Públicos 58: 580.Google Scholar
Winn, Peter (1986) Weavers of Revolution: The Yarur Workers and Chile’s Road to Socialism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar