No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Structure, Class, and Career: The Problem of Bureaucracy and Society in Russia, 1801-1917
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 January 2016
Extract
The problem of explaining the process of development of the Russian bureaucracy in the nineteenth century has been eased substantially by the appearance within the last ten years of an extraordinary collection of studies. Some of these have concen- trated on individuals, but by far the most important group of works (Amburger, 1966; Armstrong, 1959, 1973; Orlovsky, 1981; Pintner, 1970, 1975, 1980a, 1980b; Troitskii, 1974; Torke, 1967; Zaionchkovskii, 1964, 1974, 1975, 1978) has dealt with institu- tions and with groups of bureaucrats. Other interesting and helpful essays that summarize or synthesize the many individual findings have also appeared e.g., Raeff (1979), Field (1979), Orlovsky (1976).
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Social Science History Association 1982
Footnotes
This article is a revised version of a presentation made to the Third World Congress on Soviet and East European Studies in GarmischPartenkirchen, Germany, 1980. Portions of the research upon which the study is based were supported by grants from the National Endowment on the Humanities and from Bowling Green State Universit.
References
Amburger, E. (1966) Geschichte der Bohoerdenorganisation Russlands von Peter dem Grossen bis 1917. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Armstrong, J. A. (1973) The European Administrative Elite. Princeton: Princeton Univ. PressGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, J. A. (1972a) “Tsarist and Soviet elite administrators.” Slavic Rev. 31: 1–28.Google Scholar
Armstrong, J. A. (1972b) “Old regime governors: bureaucratic and partimonial attributes.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 14: 21–40.Google Scholar
Armstrong, J. A. (1966) “Party bifurcation and elite interests.” Soviet Studies 17: 417–430.Google Scholar
Armstrong, J. A. (1959) The Soviet Bureaucratic Elite: A Case Study of the Ukrainian Apparatus. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Bialer, S. (1980) Stalin’s Successors. Leadership, Stability, and Change in the Soviet Union. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Haimson, L. [ ed.] (1979) The Politics of Rural Russia. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Hamburg, G. M. (1979) “The Russian nobility on the eve of the 1905 revolution.” Russian Rev. 38: 323–338.Google Scholar
Hough, J. F. and Fainsod, M. (1979) How the Soviet Union is Governed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Orlovsky, D. T. (1981) The Limits of Reform: the Ministry of Internal Affairs in Imperial Russia, 1802–1881. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Orlovsky, D. T. (1980) “High officials in the ministry of internal affairs, 1855–1881,” pp. 250–282 in Pintner, W. M. and Rowney, D. K. (eds.) Russian Officialdom. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Orlovsky, D. T. (1976) “Recent studies on the Russian bureaucracy.” Russian Rev. 35: 448–467.Google Scholar
Pinter, W. M. (1980a) “The evolution of civil officialdom, 1755–1855,” pp. 190–226 in Pintner, W. M. and Rowney, D. K. (eds.) Russian Officialdom. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Pinter, W. M. (1980b) “Civil officialdom and the nobility in the 1850s,” pp 227–249 in Pintner, W. M. and Rowney, D. K. (eds.) Russian Officialdom. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Pinter, W. M. (1975) “The Russian higher civil service on the eve of the ‘great reforms.’” J. of Social History 8 (Spring): 55–68.Google Scholar
Pinter, W. M. (1970) “The Social characteristics of the early nineteenth-century Russian bureaucracy.” Slavic Rev. 29: 429–443.Google Scholar
Polnoe Sobranie Zakonov Rossiiskoi Imperii (1834, 1856) St. Petersburg: Vtoroe Otdelenie Sobstvennoi E.I.V. Kantseliarii.Google Scholar
Raeff, M. (1979) “The bureaucratic phenomena of imperial Russia, 1700–1905.” Amer. Historical Rev. 84: 399–411.Google Scholar
Rowney, D. K. (1980a) “Organizational change, and social adaptation: the pre-revolutionary ministry of internal affairs,” pp. 283–315 in Pintner, W. M. and Rowney, D. K. (eds.) Russian Officialdom. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Rowney, D. K. (1980b) “Machine readable data file on 60 biographic and career characteristics of higher civil servants in the provincial Imperial Russian Administration, 1916.” (unpublished)Google Scholar
Rowney, D. K. (1972a) “Higher civil servants in the Russian ministry of internal affairs: some demographic and career characteristics, 1905–1916.” Slavic Rev. 31: 101–10.Google Scholar
Rowney, D. K. (1972b) “Machine readable data file on 35 biographic and career characteristics of higher civil servants of the central Imperial Russian Administration, 1905–1916.” (unpublished)Google Scholar
Sternheimer, S. (1980) “Administration for development: the emerging bureaucratic elite, 1920–1930,” pp. 316–354 in Pintner, W. M. and Rowney, D. K. (eds.) Russian Officialdom. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Torke, H-J. (1967) “Das russische Beamtentum in der ersten Haelfte des 19. Jahrhunderts.” Forschungen zur osteuropaischen Geschichte 13: 7–345.Google Scholar
Troitskii, S. M. (1974) Russkii absoliutizm i dvorianstvo v XVIII v. Formirovanie biurokratii. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Zaionchkovskii, P. A. (1978) Pravitel’stvennyi apparat samoderzhavnoi Rossii v XIX v. Moscow: Mysl’.Google Scholar
Zaionchkovskii, P. A. (1975) “Gubernskaia administratsiia nakanune Krymskoi viony.” Voprosy istorii 9: 33–51.Google Scholar
Zaionchkovskii, P. A. (1974) “Vysshaia biurokratiia nakanune krymskoi voiny.” Istoriia SSSR 4: 154–165.Google Scholar
Zaionchkovskii, P. A. (1964) Krizis samoderzhaviia na rubezhe 1870–1880-x godov. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar