Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-20T04:53:08.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Return to History and the New Institutionalism in American Political Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

David Brian Robertson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

When it emerged as a discipline a century ago, the historical and comparative description of political institutions dominated political science. The self-consciously rigorous analysis of behavior inspired by psychology and the physical sciences began to displace historical analysis in the 1920s. By the 1950s and 1960s the behavioral revolution came to dominate the discipline’s research agendas. Leading practitioners acknowledged that the discipline’s tone was predominantly ahistorical.

Type
History and ...
Information
Social Science History , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , Spring 1993 , pp. 1 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1993 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aberbach, Joel D., Putnam, Robert D., and Rockman, Bert A. (1981) Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A. (1988) “The return to the state.” American Political Science Review 82: 853-74.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A. (1990). A Discipline Divided: Schools and Sects in Political Science. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990.Google Scholar
Amenta, Edwin, and Skocpol, Theda (1989) “Taking exception: Explaining the distinctiveness of American public policies in the last century,” in Castles, Francis G. (ed.) The Comparative History of Public Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anton, Thomas J. (1989) American Federalism and Public Policy: How the System Works. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Armstrong, John A. (1973) The European Administrative Elite. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Asher, Herbert B. (1983) “Voting behavior in the 1980s: An examination of some old and new problem areas,” in Finifter, Ada (ed.), Political Science: The State of the Discipline. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Bachrach, Peter, and Baratz, Morton (1970) Power and Poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bensel, Richard Franklin (1984) Sectionalism and American Political Development: 1880-1980. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Brady, David W. (1988) Critical Elections and Congressional Policy Making. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Brand, Donald (1988) Corporatism and the Rule of Law: A Study of the National Recovery Administration. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bridges, Amy (1984) A City in the Republic: Antebellum New York and the Origins of Machine Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brintall, Michael (1991) “APSA organized sections—A status report.” PS 24: 559-63.Google Scholar
Bryce, James (1909) “The relations of political science to history and to practice.” American Political Science Review 3:1–19.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James and Wagner, Richard (1977) Democracy in Deficit. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean (1970) Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Carnoy, Martin (1984) The State and Political Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, Joseph, and Brady, David W. (1981a) “Institutional context and leadership style: The House from Cannon to Rayburn.” American Political Science Review 75: 411-25.Google Scholar
Cooper, Joseph, and Brady, David W. (1981b) “Toward a diachronic analysis of Congress.” American Political Science Review 75: 988–1006.Google Scholar
Critchlow, Donald T., and Hawley, Ellis W. (1988) Federal Social Policy: The Historical Dimension. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. (1961a) “The behavioral approach to political science: Epitaph for a monument to a successful protest.” American Political Science Review 55:763-72.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. (1961b) Who Governs?: Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Diamant, Alfred (1981) “Bureaucracy and public policy in neocorporatist settings: Some European lessons,” Comparative Politics 14: 101-24.Google Scholar
Dodd, Lawrence C. and Schott, Richard L. (1979) Congress and the Administrative State. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony (1967) Inside Bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Easton, David (1962) “The current meaning of ‘behavioralism’ in political science,” in Charlesworth, James (ed.) The Limits of Behavioralism in Political Science. Philadelphia: American Academy of Political and Social Sciences.Google Scholar
Easton, David (1969) “The new revolution in political science,” American Political Science Review 68: 1051-61.Google Scholar
Easton, David (1990) The Analysis of Political Structure. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Eulau, Heinz (1963) The Behavioral Persuasion. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Eulau, Heinz (1976) “Understanding political life in America: The contribution of political science,” in Bonjean, Charles M., Schneider, Louis, and Lineberry, Robert L. (eds.) Social Science in America: The First Two Hundred Years. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter, Skocpol, Theda, and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich (eds.) (1985) Bringing the State Back In. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Thomas (1984) “From normalcy to New Deal: Industrial structure, party competition, and American public policy in the Great Depression.” International Organization 38: 41–94.Google Scholar
Finegold, Kenneth (1982) “From agrarianism to adjustment: The political origins of New Deal agricultural policy.” Politics and Society 11: 1–28.Google Scholar
Finegold, Kenneth (1988) “Agriculture and the politics of U.S. social provision: Social in surance and food stamps,” in Weir, Margaret, Orloff, Ann Shola, and Skocpol, Theda (eds.) The Politics of Social Policy in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris (1989) Congress: Keystone of the Washington Establishment. 2d ed. New Haven, CT. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ginsberg, Benjamin, and Shefter, Martin (1990) Politics by Other Means: Institutional Conflict and the Declining Significance of Elections in America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Goldfield, Michael (1989) “Worker insurgency, radical organization, and New Deal labor legislation.” American Political Science Review 83: 1257-82.Google Scholar
Gourevich, Peter (1986) Politics in Hard Times: Comparative Responses to International Economic Crises. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hartz, Louis (1955) The Liberal Tradition in America. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
Hattam, Victoria (1990) “Economic visions and political strategies: American labor and the state, 1865-1896.” Studies in American Political Development 4: 82–129.Google Scholar
Hawley, Ellis W. (1969) The New Deal and the Problem of Monopoly. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Heclo, Hugh (1974) Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel (1968) Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Judd, Dennis R. (1979) The Politics of American Cities. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. (ed.) (1978) Between Power and Plenty: Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial States. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. (ed.) (1985) Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Katznelson, Ira (1981) City Trenches: Urban Politics and the Patterning of Class in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, Dennis (1991) “Why political science needs history.” Political Studies 39: 479-95.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. (1949) Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. (1955) “A theory of critical elections.” Journal of Politics 17: 3–18.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. (1966) The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting, 1936-1960. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Grofman, Bernard, and Campagna, Janet (1989) “The political science 400: Citations by Ph.d. cohort and by Ph.d.-granting institution.” PS 22: 258-70.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. (1978) Defending the National Interest: Raw Materials Investments and U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. (1984) “Approaches to the state: Alternative conceptions and historical dynamics.” Comparative Politics 16: 223-46.Google Scholar
Lane, Robert E. (1965) “The politics of consensus in an age of affluence.” American Political Science Review 59: 874-95.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Charles A. (1977) Politics and Markets: The World’s Political-Economic Systems. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Charles A. (1982) “Another state of mind.” American Political Science Review 76: 9–21.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. (1969) The End of Liberalism: The Second Republic of the United States. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. (1971) “The politics of higher education: Political science as a case study,” in Graham, George J. Jr., and Carey, George W. (eds.) The Post-Behavioral Era: Perspectives on Political Science. New York: McKay.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J., and Stone, Alan (eds.) (1978) Nationalizing Government. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J., and Tarrow, Sidney G. (1980) “The 1981 APSA annual meeting program: Some thoughts and suggestions.” PS 13: 339-40.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P. (1984) “The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life.” American Political Science Review 78: 734-49.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P. (1989) Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Marks, Gary (1989) Unions in Politics: Britain, Germany, and the United States in the Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McConnell, Grant (1966) Private Power and American Democracy. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Meehan, Eugene J. (1972) “What should political scientists be doing?” in Graham, George J. Jr., and Carey, George W. (ed.) The Post-Behavioral Era: Perspectives on Political Science. New York: McKay.Google Scholar
Merelman, Richard M. (1968) “On the neo-elitist critique of community power.” American Political Science Review 62: 451-60.Google Scholar
Migdal, Joel S. (1983) “Studying the politics of development and change: The state of the art,” in Finifter, Ada W. (ed.) Political Science: The State of the Discipline. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Miliband, Ralph (1969) The State in Capitalist Society. London: Winfield and Nicholson.Google Scholar
Miller, Warren E. (1989) “Research life as a collection of intersecting probability distributions,” in Eulau, Heinz (ed.) Crossroads of Social Science: The ICPSR 25th Anniversary Volume. New York: Agathon Press.Google Scholar
Mink, Gwendolyn (1986) Old Labor and New Immigrants in American Political Development: Union, Party, and State, 1875-1920. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Moe, Terry M. (1987) “Interests, institutions, and positive theory: The politics of the NLRB.” Studies in American Political Development 2: 236-99.Google Scholar
Moore, Barrington (1967) Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Neustadt, Richard E. (1960) Presidential Power. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Nordlinger, Eric (1981) On the Autonomy of the Democratic State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
O’Connor, James (1973) The Fiscal Crisis of the State. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur (1982) The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Orloff, Ann Shola (1991) “Gender in early U.S. social policy.” Journal of Policy History 3: 249-81.Google Scholar
Orloff, Ann Shola, and Skocpol, Theda (1984) “Why not equal protection? Explaining the politics of social spending in Britain, 1900-1911, and the United States, 1880S-1920.” American Sociological Review 49: 726-50.Google Scholar
Orren, Karen (1973) Corporate Power and Social Change. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Orren, Karen, and Skowronek, Stephen (1986) “Editor’s Preface,” in Studies in American Political Development I: vii–viii.Google Scholar
Piven, Francis Fox, and Cloward, Richard A. (1971) Regulating the Poor: The Functions of Public Welfare. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Polsby, Nelson W. (1968) “The institutionalization of the House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review 62: 144-68.Google Scholar
Ricci, David M. (1984) The Tragedy of Political Science: Politics, Scholarship, and Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Riker, William H. (1980) “Implications from the disequilibrium of majority rule for the study of institutions.” American Political Science Review 74: 432-47.Google Scholar
Robertson, David Brian (1988) “Policy entrepreneurs and policy divergence: John R. Commons and William Beveridge.” Social Service Review. 62: 504-31.Google Scholar
Robertson, David Brian (1989) “The bias of American federalism: The limits of welfare state development in the Progressive era.” Journal of Policy History 1: 261-91.Google Scholar
Robertson, David Brian, and Judd, Dennis R. (1989) The Development of American Public Policy: The Structure of Policy Restraint. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman/Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Salisbury, Robert H. (1979) “Why no corporatism in America?” in Schmitter, Philippe C. and Lehmbruch, Gerhard, Trends Toward Corporatist Intermediation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Sanders, Elizabeth (1981) The Regulation of Natural Gas: Policies and Politics, 1938-1978. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Sanders, Elizabeth (1986) “Industrial concentration, sectional competition, and antitrust politics in America, 1880-1914,” in Studies in American Political Development 1: 142–214.Google Scholar
Savage, James D. (1988) Balanced Budgets and American Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. (1960) The Semi-Sovereign People. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C., and Lehmbruch, Gerhard (1979) Trends Toward Corporatist Intermediation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Scott, W. Richard (1987) Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. 2d ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Shafer, Byron (ed.) (1991) The End of Realignment? Interpreting American Electoral Eras. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Shefter, Martin (1986) “Trade unions and political machines: The organization and disorganization of the American working class in the late nineteenth century,” in Katznelson, Ira and Zolberg, Aristide R.. Working-Class Formation: Nineteenth Century Patterns in Western Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A. (1989) “Studying institutions: Some lessons from the rational choice approach.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 1: 131-47.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda (1979) States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda (1980) “Political responses to capitalist crises: Neo-Marxist theories of the state and the case of the New Deal.” Politics and Society 10:155–201.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda (1985) “Bringing the state back in,” in Evans, Peter, Skocpol, Theda, and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich (eds.) Bringing the State Back In. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda (1992) Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Politics of Social Provision in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda, and Finegold, Kenneth (1982) “State capacity and economic intervention in the early New Deal.” Political Science Quarterly 97: 255-78.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda, Finegold, Kenneth, and Goldfield, Michael (1990) “Explaining New Deal labor policy.” American Political Science Review 84:1297–1315.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda, and Ikenberry, John (1983) “The political formation of the American welfare state in historical and comparative perspective.” Comparative Social Research 6: 87–148.Google Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen (1982) Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877-1920. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. (1988) “Political jurisprudence, the ‘New Institutionalism,’ and the future of public law.” American Political Science Review 82: 89–108.Google Scholar
Somit, Albert, and Tannenhaus, Joseph (1967) The Development of American Political Science. Boston: AUyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, Arthur L. (1965) “Social structure and organizations,” in March, James G. (ed.) Handbook of Organizations. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Swift, Elaine K., and Brady, David W. (1991) “Out of the past: Theoretical and methodological contributions of congressional history.” PS 24: 61–64.Google Scholar
Truman, David B. (1953) The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Tufte, Edward (1978) Political Control of the Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tulis, Jeffrey K. (1987) The Rhetorical Presidency. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tulis, Jeffrey K. (1990) “Section president’s report.” History and Politics Section News letter 1: 2.Google Scholar
Waldo, Dwight (1975) “Political science: Tradition, discipline, profession, science, enterprise,” in Greenstein, Fred I. and Polsby, Nelson W. (eds.) Handbook of Political Science, vol. 1 : Political Science: Scope and Theory. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel (1971) “The state and social transformation: Will and possibility. Politics and Society 1: 359-64.Google Scholar
Weir, Margaret (1989) “Ideas and politics: The acceptance of Keynesianism in Britain and the United States,” in Hall, Peter A. (ed.), The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism Across Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Weir, Margaret, Orloff., Ann Shola and Skocpol, Theda (eds.) (1988) The Politics of Social Policy in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Whicker, Marcia, and Moore, Raymond (1988) When Presidents Are Great. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Willoughby, W. W. (1896) An Examination of the Nature of the State. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wilson, Woodrow (1898) The State: Elements of Historical and Practical Politics. Boston: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
Woolley, John (1984) The Federal Reserve Bank and the Politics of Monetary Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zysman, John (1983) Governments, Markets, and Growth: Financial Systems and the Politics of Industrial Change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1983.Google Scholar