No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Kinship Networks and Migration
A Nineteenth-Century Swedish Example
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 January 2016
Extract
Migration research has long recognized and effectively documented the significance of demographic and economic variables in affecting the propensity for individuals to migrate. The decision to move is often seen as a function of age, family status, length of residence, and economic circumstance. In addition, there is the assumption that relative location in kinship networks is significant in that the idea to migrate is implanted or resisted as a function of personal and associative links within the community. This latter process, however, is more difficult to document. As a consequence, most studies can only infer its operation and its relationship to other variables.
A major problem in demonstrating the influence of kinship networks is that the pattern of associations between households in any sizable population is exceedingly difficult to unravel and define. This is especially true of historical studies. While detailed information frequently exists for some households in a given population, it rarely exists for all.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Social Science History Association 1982
References
Åkerman, S. Kronberg, B., and Nilsson, T. (1977) “Emigration, family and kinship.” Amer. Studies in Scandinavia 9: 105–122.Google Scholar
Anderson, M. (1971) Family Structure in Nineteenth Century Lancashire. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Beider, R. E. (1973) “Kinship as a factor in migration.” J. of Marriage and the Family 35: 429–439.Google Scholar
Brown, J. S., Schwarzweller, H. K., and Mangalam, J. J. (1963) “Kentucky mountain migration and the stem-family: an American variation on a theme by Le Play.” Rural Sociology 28: 48–69.Google Scholar
Choldin, H. M. (1973) “Kinship networks in the migration process.” Demography 10: 163–175.Google Scholar
Erickson, C. (1980) “Explanatory models in immigration and migration research,” pp. 7–26 in Semmingsen, I. and Seyerstad, P. (eds.) Scando-Americana Papers on Emigration to the United States. Oslo: American Institute, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Erickson, C. (1972) Invisible Immigrants: the Adaptation of English and Scottish Immigrants in 19th Century America. Leicester: Leicester Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Hecht, I.W.D. (1977) “Kinship and migration: the making of an Oregon isolate community.” J. of Interdisciplinary History 28: 45–67.Google Scholar
Hägerstrand, T. (1947) “En landsbygdsbefolknings flyttningsrorelser.” Svensk Geografisk Arsbok 23: 114–142.Google Scholar
Johnston, R. J. (1971) “Resistance to migration and the mover/stayer dichotomy: aspects of kinship and population stability in an English rural area.” Geografiska Annaler 53B: 16–27.Google Scholar
Omner, R. E. (1977) “Highland Scots migration to southwestern Newfoundland: a study of kinship,” pp. 212–233 in Mannion, J. J. (ed.) The Peopling of Newfoundland: Essays in Historical Geography. St.John's: Institute of Social and Economic Research, Memorial University of Newfoundland.Google Scholar
Ostergren, R. C. (1981) “Land and family in rural immigrant communities” Annals of the Association of Amer. Geographers 71: 400–412.Google Scholar
Ostergren, R. C. (1980) “Prairie bound: migration patterns to a Swedish settlement on the Dakota frontier,” pp. 73–91 in Luebke, F. C. (ed.) Ethnicity on the Great Plains. Lincoln: Univ. of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Ostergren, R. C. (1979) “A community transplanted: the formative experience of a Swedish immigrant community in the Upper Middle West.” J. of Historical Geography 5: 189–212.Google Scholar
Ostergren, R. C. (1976) “Rättvik to Isanti: a community transplanted.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Rice, J. G. and Ostergren, R. C. (1978) “The decision to emigrate: a study in diffusion.” Geografiska Annaler 60B: 1–15.Google Scholar