No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
From Pluralism to Diversity
Reassessing the Political Uses of The Uses of the University
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 January 2016
Abstract
This article traces the pluralist politics at the heart of Clark Kerr's book The Uses of the University to the present-day politics of diversity. Pluralism was the dominant theory of American politics at midcentury, and Kerr was among its most admired spokespersons. First as a labor economist and strike negotiator, then as chancellor of the University of California, Berkeley, and later as president of the University of California system, Kerr relied on “pluralistic decision-making” to harmonize relations among the multiversity's mix of vested interests. Shortly after The Uses of the University was published in 1963, however, student protesters at Berkeley and at other multiversities like it let Kerr know that they had grown tired of the pluralist politics that he championed. Ironically, in their effort to upend the pluralist status quo and to make politics more participatory, campus insurgents sowed the seeds for the growth of a new brand of pluralist politics known as diversity. By uncovering the relationship between pluralism and diversity, this article reveals the enduring—and surprising—political legacy of Kerr's multiversity model 50 years after he unveiled it.
- Type
- Special Section: The Uses of the University: After Fifty Years
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Social Science History Association 2012
References
Anderson, Terry H. (2004) The Pursuit of Fairness: A History of Affirmative Action. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ball, Howard (2000) The Bakke Case: Race, Education, and Affirmative Action. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Balogh, Brian (2005) “Making pluralism ‘great’: Beyond a recycled history of the Great Society,” in Milkis, Sidney M.Milieur, Jerome M. (eds.) The Great Society and the High Tide of Liberalism. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press: 145–79.Google Scholar
Bentley, Arthur F. (1908) The Process of Government: A Study of Social Pressures. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bok, Derek (2003) Universities in the Marketplace: The Commercialization of Higher Education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Borders, William (1967) “Ivy League shifts admission goals.” New York Times, April 17.Google Scholar
Brick, Howard (1998) Age of Contradiction: American Thought and Culture in the 1960s. New York: Twayne.Google Scholar
Ching, Frank (1973) “Expansion of Asian-American studies on U.S. campuses reflects growth of ethnic consciousness.” New York Times, July 16.Google Scholar
Cohen, RobertZelnik, Reginald E., eds. (2002) The Free Speech Movement: Reflections on Berkeley in the 1960s. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Robert M. (2000) More: The Politics of Economic Growth in Postwar America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Delbanco, Andrew (2005) “The endangered university.” New York Review of Books, March 24.Google Scholar
Douglass, John A. (2000) The California Idea and American Higher Education: 1850 to the 1960 Master Plan. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.10.1515/9781503617100Google Scholar
Duderstadt, James J. (1990) The Michigan Mandate: A Strategic Linking of Academic Excellence and Social Diversity (Draft 6.0). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Duderstadt, James J. (2007) The View from the Helm: Leading the American University during an Era of Change. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Duderstadt, James J.Womack, Farris W. (2003) The Future of the Public University in America: Beyond the Crossroads. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Engelhardt, Tom (2007 [1994]) The End of Victory Culture: Cold War America and the Disillusioning of a Generation. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Geiger, Roger L. (1993) Research and Relevant Knowledge: American Research Universities since World War II. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Geiger, Roger L. (2004) Knowledge and Money: Research Universities and the Paradox of the Marketplace. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, John MasonRosenthal, Albert J.Meyers, Charles J.Sacks, Albert MartinSovern, Michael I. (1977) Amicus brief for Columbia University, Harvard University, Stanford University, and the University of Pennsylvania. Submitted for Regents of California v. Bakke. 98 U.S. S.Ct. 2733 (1978).Google Scholar
Hayden, TomHaber, Robert Alan (1962) Port Huron Statement of the Students for a Democratic Society, 1962, coursesa.matrix.msu.edu/~hst306/documents/huron.html (accessed January 15, 2009).Google Scholar
Hess, Frederick M.Schneider, MarkCarey, KevinKelly, Andrew P. (2009) Diplomas and Dropouts: Which Colleges Actually Graduate Their Students (and Which Don’t). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute, June, www.aei.org/files/2009/06/03/Diplomas%20and%20Dropouts%20final.pdf.Google Scholar
Isenberg, Barbara (1971) “Boosting ‘liberation’: Women’s studies rise in college popularity.” Wall Street Journal, June 9.Google Scholar
Johnston, William B.Packer, Arnold E. (1987) Workforce 2000: Work and Workers for the Twenty-First Century. Indianapolis, IN: Hudson Institute.Google Scholar
Kelly, ErinDobbin, Frank (2001) “How affirmative action became diversity management: Employer response to antidiscrimination law, 1961–1996,” in Skrentny, John D. (ed.) Color Lines: Affirmative Action, Immigration, and Civil Rights Options for America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 87–117.Google Scholar
Kerr, Clark (1993) Higher Education: Doing So Well, Feeling So Bad. Atlanta: Southern Regional Education Board.Google Scholar
Kerr, Clark (2001a) The Gold and the Blue: A Personal Memoir of the University of California, 1949–1967. Vol. 1, Academic Triumphs. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kerr, Clark (2001b [1963]) The Uses of the University. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kerr, Clark (2002) “Fall of 1964 at Berkeley: Confrontation yields to reconciliation,” in Cohen, RobertZelnik, Reginald E. (eds.) The Free Speech Movement: Reflections on Berkeley in the 1960s. Berkeley: University of California Press: 362–98.Google Scholar
Kerr, Clark (2003) The Gold and the Blue: A Personal Memoir of the University of California, 1949–1967. Vol. 2, Political Turmoil. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kerr, ClarkDunlop, John T.Harbison, Frederick H.Myers, Charles A. (1960) Industrialism and Industrial Man: The Problem of Labor and Management in Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lemann, Nicholas (2000 [1999]) The Big Test: The Secret History of the American Meritocracy. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Levine, ArthurCureton, Jeanette (1992) “The quiet revolution: Eleven facts about multiculturalism and the curriculum.” Change, January–February.Google Scholar
Levine, ArthurCureton, Jeanette (1998) When Hope and Fear Collide: A Portrait of Today’s College Student. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Loss, Christopher P. (2012) Between Citizens and the State: The Politics of American Higher Education in the Twentieth Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, Frederick R. (1997) The Diversity Machine: The Drive to Change the “White Male Workplace.” New York: Transaction.Google Scholar
McGirr, Lisa (2001) Suburban Warriors: The Origins of the New American Right. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne (2005) Soldiers to Citizens: The G.I. Bill and the Making of the Greatest Generation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Michalak, Joseph (1980) “Middle class gets more aid from U.S.” New York Times, November 16.Google Scholar
Novick, Peter (1988) That Noble Dream: The “Objectivity Question” and the American Historical Profession. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Perry, Barbara A. (2007). The Michigan Affirmative Action Cases. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Potter, Paul (2007 [1965]) “Paul Potter, ‘Name the system!’ (April 17, 1965),” in Flamm, Michael W.Steigerwald, David (eds.) Debating the 1960s: Liberal, Conservative, and Radical Perspectives. New York: Rowman and Littlefield: 92–95.Google Scholar
Powell, Lewis F. (1978) “What the court said in two 5-to-4 rulings on the Bakke case.” Chronicle of Higher Education, July 3.Google Scholar
Project on Student Debt (2011) Student Debt and the Class of 2010, November, projectonstudentdebt.org/files/pub/classof2010.pdf.Google Scholar
Pusser, Brian (2004) Burning Down the House: Politics, Governance, and Affirmative Action at the University of California. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Reisman, David (1950) The Lonely Crowd: A Study of the Changing American Character. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rhoads, Robert A. (1998) Freedom’s Web: Student Activism in an Age of Cultural Diversity. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Riley, Paddy (2006) “Clark Kerr: From the industrial to the knowledge economy,” in Lichtenstein, Nelson (ed.) American Capitalism: Social Thought and Political Economy in the American Twentieth Century. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press: 71–87.Google Scholar
Robinson, Armstead L.Nunn, Raymond S.deChabert, Glenn E.Thompson, Larry E. (1971 [1969]) “On being black at Yale,” in Wallerstein, ImmanuelStarr, Paul (eds.) University Crisis Reader. Vol. 2, The Liberal University under Attack. New York: Vintage: 378–91.Google Scholar
Rorabaugh, William J. (1989) Berkeley at War: The 1960s. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Dorothy (1991) The Origins of American Social Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Savio, Mario (1964) Mario Savio: Sproul Hall Steps, December 2, 1964, Media Resources Center, Moffitt Library, University of California, Berkeley, www.lib.berkeley.edu/MRC/saviotranscript.html (accessed January 17, 2009).Google Scholar
Schattschneider, Elmer E. (1960) The Semi-sovereign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Arthur Jr. (1988 [1949]) Vital Center: The Politics of Freedom. New York: Da Capo.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Peggy (1988) “Women and minorities: Is industry ready?” New York Times, October 15.Google Scholar
Schulman, Bruce J.Zelizer, Julian E., eds. (2008) Rightward Bound: Making America Conservative in the 1970s. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Skrentny, John D. (1996) The Ironies of Affirmative Action: Politics, Culture, and Justice in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Slaughter, SheilaLeslie, Larry L. (1997) Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. Roosevelt (1990) “From affirmative action to affirming diversity.” Harvard Business Review, March–April.Google Scholar
Truman, David B. (1951) The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Walker, Jack L. (1994 [1991]) Mobilizing Interest Groups in America: Patrons, Professions, and Social Movements. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Yamane, David (2001) Student Movements for Multiculturalism: Challenging the Curricular Color Line in Higher Education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar