Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T08:49:04.233Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Dialogue of Struggle: The Contest over Ideological Boundaries in the Case of London Silk Weavers in the Early Nineteenth Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Marc W. Steinberg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The early decades of the nineteenth century are widely recognized as formative years for the English working class. During the first two decades a wide variety of trade groups struggled at both the regional and national levels to protect artisanal rights and unmuzzle the legally muted voice of labor (Prothero 1979; Randall 1991; Rule 1986; E. P. Thompson 1966). Success was at best uneven. Revocation of the Statute of Apprentices in 1813–14 was an alarming defeat for artisans who sought to protect their trade privileges from growing capitalist incursions. The successful repeal of the Combination Laws that had barred trade unions in 1824 encouraged a clamoring among many of London’s trades to resuscitate wage rates, precipitating strikes in many industries. Also emerging from the lean years was a new understanding of the relations between capital and labor. “The interests of the masters and men,” London’s Trades’ Newspaper pronounced, “are as much opposed to each other as light is to darkness” (Hollis 1973: 45).

Type
Special Section: Making History from Above and Below: Elite and Popular Perspectives on Politics
Information
Social Science History , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , Winter 1994 , pp. 505 - 542
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1994 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abercrombie, Nicholas (1980) Class, Structure, and Knowledge: Problems in the Sociology of Knowledge. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
An Account of the Proceedings of the Committees of the Journeymen Silk Weavers of Spitalfields; in the Legal Defence of the Acts of Parliament, Granted to their Trade, in the 13th, 32nd, and 51st Years of the Reign of his late Majesty, King George the Third (1823) London: E. Justins.Google Scholar
Alexander, Sally (1976) “Women’s work in nineteenth-century London: A study of the years 1820–50,” in Mitchell, Juliet and Oakley, Ann (eds.) The Rights and Wrongs of Women. Harmondsworth: Penguin: 59–111.Google Scholar
Althusser, Louis (1971) Lenin and Philosophy. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981) The Dialogic Imagination. Edited by Holquist, Michael. Translated by Emerson, Caryl and Holquist, Michael. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986) Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Edited by Emerson, Caryl and Holquist, Michael. Translated by McGee, Vern W.. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
B.P.P., H. of C. (1818a) British Parliamentary Papers. House of Commons. Report of the Committee on Silk Weavers’ Petitions. Vol. 9, sec. 134.Google Scholar
B.P.P., H. of C. (1818b) British Parliamentary Papers. House of Commons. Second Report of the Committee on Silk Weavers’ Petitions. Vol. 9, sec. 211.Google Scholar
B.P.P., H. of C. (1832) British Parliamentary Papers. House of Commons. Report of the Select Committee on the Silk Trade. Vol. 19, sec. 678.Google Scholar
B.P.P., H. of C. (1834a) British Parliamentary Papers. House of Commons. Report from the Select Committee on Handloom Weavers’ Petitions. Vol. 10, sec. 556.Google Scholar
B.P.P., H. of C. (1834b) British Parliamentary Papers. House of Commons. Report from the Assistant Poor Law Commissioners, pt. 3. Vol. 29, sec. 44.Google Scholar
B.P.P., H. of C. (1835) British Parliamentary Papers. House of Commons. Report from the Select Committee on the State of Education in England and Wales. Vol. 7, sec. 572.Google Scholar
B.P.P., L.S.P. (1823) British Parliamentary Papers. Lords’ Sessional Papers. Minutes of Evidence Taken Before the Lords Committee on The Bill, intitled, “An Act to repeal certain Acts of His late Majesty relating to the Wage of Persons employed in the Manufacture of Silk, and of Silk mixed with Other Materials, House of Lords Sessional Papers.” Vol. 156, sec. 57.Google Scholar
Barrett, Michelle (1991) The Politics of Truth: From Marx to Foucault. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Behagg, Clive (1990) Politics and Production in the Early Nineteenth Century. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Belchem, John C. (1985) “Orator Hunt”: Henry Hunt and English Working-Class Radicalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Belchem, John C. (1990) Industrialization and the Working Class: The English Experience, 1750–1900. Portland, OR: Areopagitica.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. Lance (1975) “Political scenarios and the nature of politics.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 6: 23–42.Google Scholar
Belchem, John C. (1979) “Imitation, ambiguity, and drama in political life: Civil religion and the demands of public morality.” Journal of Politics 41: 106–33.Google Scholar
Belchem, John C. (1980a) “Myth, ritual, and political control.” Journal of Communication 30:166–79.Google Scholar
Belchem, John C. (1980b) “The paradox of public discourse: A framework for the analysis of political accounts.” Journal of Politics 42: 792–817.Google Scholar
Berg, Maxine (1980) The Machinery Question and the Making of Political Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bland, A. E., Brown, P. A., and Tawney, R. H., eds. (1919) English Economic History: Select Documents. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Blewett, Mary (1993) “Deference and defiance: Labor politics and the meanings of masculinity in the mid-nineteenth-century New England textile industry.” Gender and History 5: 398–415.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1977) “The economics of linguistic exchange.” Social Science Information 16: 645–68.Google Scholar
Bowles, Samuel, and Gintis, Herbert (1986) Democracy and Capitalism: Property, Community, and the Contradictions of Modern Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
British Library. Add. MSS 27799, 27803, 27804, 27805 (Place Papers).Google Scholar
British Library. Francis Place Collection of Newspaper Clippings and Pamphlets.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Craig (1982) The Question of Class Struggle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Callinicos, Alex (1990) Against Postmodernism. New York: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
Claeys, Gregory (1985) “The reaction to political radicalism and the popularisation of political economy in early nineteenth-century Britain,” in Shinn, Terry and Whitley, Richard (eds.) Expository Science: Forms and Functions of Popularisation. Dordrecht: D. Reidel: 119–36.Google Scholar
Claeys, Gregory (1987) Machinery, Money, and the Millennium: From Moral Economy to Socialism, 1815–1850. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Claeys, Gregory (1989) Citizens and Saints: Politics and Anti-Politics in Early British Socialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clapham, J. H. (1916) “The Spitalfields Acts, 1773–1824.” Economic Journal 26: 459–71.Google Scholar
Clark, Anna (1990) “Queen Caroline and the sexual politics of popular culture in London, 1820.” Representations 31: 46–68.Google Scholar
Clark, Anna (1992) “The rhetoric of Chartist domesticity: Gender, language, and class in the 1830s and 1840s.” Journal of British Studies 31: 62–88.Google Scholar
Colley, Linda (1992) Britons: Forging the Nation, 1707–1837. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
“Coventry Freeman” (1824) Animadversions on the Repeal of the Act for Regulating the Wages of Labour among the Spitalfield Weavers; and in the Combination Law. London: R. Brown.Google Scholar
Dean, Mitchell (1991) The Constitution of Poverty: Toward a Genealogy of Liberal Governance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Derry, T. K. (1931) “The repeal of the apprenticeship clauses of the statute of apprentices.” Economic History Review, 2d ser., 3: 67–87.Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry (1991) Ideology: An Introduction. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Edelman, Murray (1964) The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Edelman, Murray (1977) Political Language: Words That Succeed and Policies That Fail. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Femia, Joseph V. (1981) Gramsci’s Political Thought: Hegemony, Consciousness, and the Revolutionary Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, Barbara (1985) “The politics of deconstruction,” in Davis, Robert C. and Schleifer, Ronald (eds.) Rhetoric and Form: Deconstruction at Yale. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press: 113–34.Google Scholar
Foster, John (1974) Class Struggle and the Industrial Revolution. New York: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
Fowler, Roger, and Kress, Gunther (1979) “Critical linguistics,” in Fowler, Roger, Hodge, Bob, Kress, Gunther, and Trew, Tony, Language and Control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul: 185–213.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy (1989) Unruly Practices: Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Gardiner, Michael (1992) The Dialogics of Critique: M. M. Bakhtin and the Theory of Ideology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
George, M. Dorothy (1925) London Life in the Eighteenth Century. London: K. Paul, Trench and Trubner.Google Scholar
Geras, Norman (1987) “Post-Marxism?” New Left Review, no. 163: 40–82.Google Scholar
Geras, Norman (1988) “Ex-Marxism without substance: Being a reply to Laclau and Mouffe.” New Left Review, no. 169: 34–61.Google Scholar
Goldstone, Jack (1991) “Ideology, cultural frameworks, and the process of revolution.” Theory and Society 20: 405–53.Google Scholar
Goldstrom, Max (1985) “Popular political economy for the British working class in the nineteenth century,” in Shinn, Terry and Whitley, Richard (eds.) Expositoryy Science: Forms and Functions of Popularisation. Dordrecht: D. Reidel: 259–73.Google Scholar
Gordon, Barry (1976) Political Economy in Parliament, 1819–1823. New York: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
Gordon, Barry (1979) Economic Doctrine and Tory Liberalism, 1824–1830. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gramsci, Antonio (1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Edited and translated by Quintín Hoare and Geoffrey N. Smith. New York: International.Google Scholar
Gray, Robert (1988) “The language of factory reform in Britain, c. 1830–1860,” in Joyce, Patrick (ed.) The Historical Meanings of Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 73–93.Google Scholar
Gray, Robert (1993) “Factory legislation and the gendering of jobs in the north of England, 1830–1860.” Gender and History 5: 56–80.Google Scholar
Great Britain Public Record Office (Kew Gardens), Home Office Papers, 40/23-27. Correspondence, Civil Disturbances.Google Scholar
Great Britain Public Record Office (Kew Gardens), Home Office Papers, 44/18. Correspondence, George IV.Google Scholar
Grossberg, Lawrence (1979) “Language and theorizing in the human sciences.” Studies in Symbolic Interaction 2: 189–231.Google Scholar
Grossberg, Lawrence (1986) “History, politics, and postmodernism: Stuart Hall and cultural studies.” Journal of Communication Inquiry 10: 61–77.Google Scholar
Grossberg, Lawrence (1992) We Gotta Get out of This Place: Popular Conservatism and Postmodern Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hale, William (1822) An Appeal to the Public, in Defence of the Spitalfields Act: with Remarks on the Causes Which Have Led to the Miseries and Moral Deterioration of the Poor. London: E. Justins.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart (1981) “Notes on deconstructing the ‘popular,’” in Samuel, Raphael (ed.) People’s History and Socialist Theory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul: 227–40.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart (1982) “The rediscovery of ‘ideology’: Return of the repressed in media studies,” in Gurevitch, Michael et al. (eds.) Culture, Society, and the Media. London: Methuen: 56–90.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart (1986) “On postmodernism and articulation: An interview with Stuart Hall.” Edited by Grossberg, Lawrence. Journal of Communication Inquiry 10: 45–60.Google Scholar
Hammond, John, and Hammond, Barbara (1967 [1919]) The Skilled Labourer, 1760–1832. New York: August M. Kelley.Google Scholar
Hammond, John, and Hammond, Barbara (1975 [1917]) The Town Labourer, 1780–1832: The New Civilization. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.Google Scholar
Hansard’s Parliamentary Debates, new series.Google Scholar
Hennessy, Rosemary (1992) Materialist Feminism and the Politics of Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hilton, Boyd (1977) Corn, Cash, Commerce: The Economic Policies of the Tory Governments, 1815–1830. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hilton, Boyd (1988) The Age of Atonement: The Influence of Evangelism on Social and Economic Thought, 1795–1865. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Hirschkop, Ken (1986) “Bakhtin, discourse, and democracy.” New Left Review, no. 160: 91–111.Google Scholar
Hirst, Paul (1979) On Law and Ideology. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hollis, Patricia, ed. (1973) Class and Class Conflict in Nineteenth-Century England, 1815–1850. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Holquist, Michael (1990) Dialogism: Bakhtin and His World. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hone, J. Ann (1982) For the Cause of Truth: Radicalism in London, 1796–1821. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Home, Thomas A. (1990) Property Rights and Poverty: Political Argument in Britain, 1605–1834. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Hunt, Alan (1990) “Rights and social movements: Counter-hegemonic strategies.” Journal of Law and Society 17: 309–28.Google Scholar
Jordan, W. M. (1931) “The silk industry in London, 1760–1830, with special reference to the conditions of the wage-earners and the policy of the Spitalfields Acts.” M.A. thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto (1977) Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, and Mouffe, Chantal (1982) “Recasting Marxism: Hegemony and new political movements.” By David Plotke. Socialist Review, no. 66: 91–113.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, and Mouffe, Chantal (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Toward a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, and Mouffe, Chantal (1987) “Post-Marxism without apologies.” New Left Review, no. 166: 79–106.Google Scholar
Larrain, Jorge (1991) “Stuart Hall and the Marxist concept of ideology.” Theory, Culture, and Society 8:1–28.Google Scholar
Letters, Taken from Various Newspapers, Tending to Injure the Journeymen Silk Weavers of Spitalfields, with an Attack against the Acts of Parliament, Regulating the Prices of Their Work … Also, the Answers, by the Journeymen and Their Friends (1818) London: E. Justins.Google Scholar
Lown, Judy (1990) Women and Industrialization: Gender at Work in Nineteenth-Century England. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
McCalman, Iain (1980) “Females, feminism, and freelove in an early nineteenth century radical movement.” Labour History 38:1–25.Google Scholar
McCalman, Iain (1984) “Unrespectable radicalism: Infidels and pornography in early nineteenth- century London.” Past and Present 104: 74–110.Google Scholar
McCalman, Iain (1989) Radical Underworld: Prophets, Revolutionaries, and Pornographers in London, 1795–1840. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McClelland, Keith (1989) “Some thoughts on masculinity and the ‘representative artisan’ in Britain, 1850–1915.” Gender and History 1:164–77.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Eleanor (1990) “Derrida and the politics of interpretation,” in Miliband, Ralph, Panitch, Leo, and Saville, John (eds.) Socialist Register, 1990. London: Merlin: 228–43.Google Scholar
Manchester Times.Google Scholar
Markovic, Mikhail (1984) Dialectical Theory of Meaning. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Martineau, Harriet (1833) Illustrations of Political Economy. No. 17, The Loom Lugger, pt. 1. London: Charles Fox.Google Scholar
Meiksins Wood, Ellen (1986) The Retreat from Class: A New True Socialism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Mészáros, Istvan (1989) The Power of Ideology. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
More, Hannah (1819) Cheap Repository Tracts. London: F. C. and J. Rivington.Google Scholar
Morris, Aldon, and Herring, Cedric (1987) “Theory and research in social movements: A critical review,” in Long, Samuel (ed.) Annual Review of Political Science. Norwood, NJ: Ablex: 137–98.Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal (1979) “Hegemony and ideology in Gramsci,” in Mouffe, Chantal (ed.) Gramsci and Marxist Theory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul: 168–204.Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal (1988) “Hegemony and new political subjects: Towards a new concept of democracy,” in Nelson, Cary and Grossberg, Lawrence (eds.) Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Urbana: University of Illinois Press: 89–104.Google Scholar
Observations on the Ruinous Effects of the Spitalfields Acts to the Silk Manufacture of London: to Which is Added a Reply to Mr. Hale’s Appeal to the Public in Defence of the Act (1822) London: John and Arthur Arch.Google Scholar
Palmer, Bryan D. (1990) Descent into Discourse: The Reification of Language and the Writing of Social History. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Parsinnen, T. M. (1973) “Association, convention, and anti-Parliament in British radical politics, 1771–1848.” English Historical Review 88: 504–33.Google Scholar
Pinchbeck, Ivy (1969) Women Workers and the Industrial Revolution, 1780–1850. London: Verago.Google Scholar
Plummer, Alfred (1972) The London Weavers’ Company, 1600–1970. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Powell, John (1824) A Letter Addressed to Weavers, Shopkeepers, and Publicans, on the Great Value of the Principle of the Spitalfields Acts: In Opposition to the Absurd and Mischievous Doctrines of the Advocates for their Repeal. London: E. Justins.Google Scholar
Prothero, Iowerth (1979) Artisans and Politics in Early Nineteenth-Century London: John Gast and His Times. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Prout, John (1829) Practical View of the Silk Trade … Macclesfield: J. Swinnerton.Google Scholar
Randall, Adrian (1990) “New languages or old? Labour, capital, and discourse in the Industrial Revolution.” Social History 14: 195–216.Google Scholar
Randall, Adrian (1991) Before the Luddites: Custom, Community, and Machinery in the English Woollen Industry, 1776–1809. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Report Adopted at a General Meeting of the Journeymen Broad Silk Weavers, held in Saint John Street Chapel, Brick-lane, Spitalfields, On Wednesday, the 20th of February, 1828, to take into their Consideration the Necessity of Petitioning the Legislature for a Wage Protection Bill and such other purposes as may arise out of the same. To which is Appended, The Petition (1828) London: W. C. Mantz.Google Scholar
Rose, Sonya O. (1992) Limited Livelihoods: Gender and Class in Nineteenth-Century England. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rose, Sonya O. (1993) “Respectable men, disorderly others: The language of gender and the Lancashire weavers’ strike of 1878 in Britain.” Gender and Society 5: 382–97.Google Scholar
Rossi-Landi, Ferruccio (1990) Marxism and Ideology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, W D. (1987) Elites and Wealth in Modern British History. Brighton: Harvester: 265–303.Google Scholar
Rude, George (1962) Wilkes and Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rule, John (1986) The Labouring Classes in Early Industrial England, 1750–1820. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rule, John (1988) “The property of skill in the period of manufacture,” in Joyce, Patrick (ed.) The Historical Meanings of Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 99–118.Google Scholar
Scott, James (1985) Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James (1990) Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shelton, Walter J. (1972) English Hunger and Industrial Disorders. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Smail, John (1987) “New languages for labour and capital: The transformation of discourse in the early years of the Industrial Revolution.” Social History 12: 49–72.Google Scholar
Smail, John (1991) “New languages? Yes indeed: A reply to Adrian Randall.” Social History 16: 217–22.Google Scholar
Somers, Margaret R. (1992) “Narrativity, narrative identity, and social action: Rethinking English working-class formation.” Social Science History 16: 591–630.Google Scholar
Soper, Kate (1991) “Postmodernism and its discontents.” Feminist Review 39: 97–108.Google Scholar
Stedman Jones, Gareth (1983) The Languages of Class: Studies in English Working-Class History, 1832–1982. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strumingher, Laura S. (1979) Women and the Making of the Working Class: Lyon, 1830–1970. St. Alban’s, VT: Eden.Google Scholar
Taylor, Barbara (1983) Eve and the New Jerusalem: Socialism and Feminism in the Nineteenth Century. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Terdiman, Richard (1986) Discourse/Counter-Discourse: The Theory and Practice of Symbolic Resistance in Nineteenth-Century France. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Therborn, Goran (1980) The Power of Ideology and the Ideology of Power. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. (1966) The Making of the English Working Class. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. (1971) “The moral economy of the English crowd in the eighteenth century.” Past and Present 50: 76–136.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. (1991) Customs in Common: Studies in Traditional Popular Culture. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, John B. (1990) Ideology and Modern Culture: Critical Social Theory in the Era of Mass Communication. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Noel W. (1984) The People’s Science: The Popular Political Economy of Exploitation and Crisis, 1816–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles (1991) “Revolution, war, and other struggles in Great Britain, 1789–1815.” Working Paper Series, no. 127. Center for Studies of Social Change, New School for Social Research, New York.Google Scholar
Trades’ Free Press.Google Scholar
Trades’ Newspaper and Weekly Free Press.Google Scholar
Valenze, Deborah (1985) Prophetic Sons and Daughters: Female Preaching and Popular Religion in the Industrial Revolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
“Verax” (1822) Review of the Statements in Hale’s Appeal to the Public on the Spitalfields Acts. London: J. Hudson.Google Scholar
Volosinov, V. N. (1983) “Literary stylistics,” in Shukman, Ann (ed.) Bakhtin School Poetics. Oxford: RPT: 93–152.Google Scholar
Volosinov, V. N. (1986 [1929]) Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Warner, Frank (1922) The Silk Industry of the United Kingdom: Its Origins and Development. London: Drane’s.Google Scholar
Whatley, Richard (1975 [1827]) Elements of Logic. 2d ed. Delmar, NY: Scholars’.Google Scholar